Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz: match statistics
Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Elana Toruń played Unia Swarzędz in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski im. Grzegorza Duneckiego. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Elana Toruń: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Unia Swarzędz: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Elana Toruń scores 1.52 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Unia Swarzędz scores 1.19 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Elana Toruń 55%, Unia Swarzędz 39%. Over 2.5: Elana Toruń 58%, Unia Swarzędz 42%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Unia Swarzędz has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.53. Elana Toruń: 10.4 shots per match, Unia Swarzędz: 10.8.
Match halves
Elana Toruń: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.77. Unia Swarzędz: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Elana Toruń: 76-90+ (12 goals). Unia Swarzędz: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 2: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Unia Swarzędz holds a clear edge based on form — the visitors collected 11 points in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 2 draws) and scored 9 goals, while Elana has only 1 point in that period (0-1-4) and 4 goals, averaging 2.2 vs 0.2 points per game. Over the season Elana at home averages 1.5 goals and xG 1.7 with 5.15 shots on target, whereas Unia away scores 1.33 goals and has xG 1.47 with 3.91 shots on target — the hosts create more chances, but that hasn’t translated into recent results. Defensively Unia is more reliable: they concede 1.2 goals away and keep 33% clean sheets, while Elana at home concedes 1.43 goals and has 21% clean sheets. The gap is also evident over the last 5 matches in terms of defense and efficiency — Elana conceded 13 goals in five games, Unia only 4, which strongly favors the visitors. Considering these numbers and trends, I give Unia the greater chances, despite Elana’s better xG and shots figures at home.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 58% vs 42% because xG data and recent form favor both teams scoring. Averaged xG values — Elana xG_for 1.64 vs Unia xG_against 1.39 (avg ≈1.52) and Unia xG_for 1.47 vs Elana xG_against 1.15 (≈1.31) — translate to roughly a 78% chance that the home side will score and about a 73% chance the away side will score, which under independence yields ~57% for BTTS. In the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS in 60% of cases, and goal stats show Elana scored 4 and conceded 13 goals (avg 0.8 and 2.6), while Unia scored 9 and conceded 4 (1.8 and 0.8), which significantly increases Unia’s scoring probability. Counter signals are seasonal BTTS rates of only 38% and 40% and the fact Elana failed to score in 56% of season matches; however, higher xG and the large number of goals conceded by Elana in the last 5 fixtures push me toward the Yes option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match leans towards goals: the league average is 2.93 goals, and the percentage of matches with at least one goal is 81% for Elana and 93% for Unia. In the last 5 fixtures Elana averaged 0.8 scored and conceded 2.6 (total 4:13), while Unia averaged 1.8 scored and conceded 0.8 (9:4), indicating a weaker Elana defense and stronger Unia attack. xG in the last 5 matches is 1.04 for Elana and 1.40 for Unia; season offensive xG are 1.64 (Elana) and 1.47 (Unia), and opponent xG allowed are 1.15 and 1.39; combining these figures I estimate 0.95 goals for Elana and 1.65 for Unia (sum 2.60). Based on this I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (80%) and a moderate probability to Over 2.5 (58%), while Over 3.5 looks less likely (30%). The best pick is Over 1.5, because the expected total of 2.60 is well above 1.5, and seasonal and recent indicators (Over1.5: Elana 56%, Unia 67%; in last 5: Over2.5 Elana 80%, Unia 60%) support the minimum-two-goal scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Unia Swarzędz shows a clear advantage in the first half: the visitors led at the break in 46% of matches this season and in 60% of their last 5 appearances, while Elana did not lead at the break in their last 5 matches (0%), which strongly favors the visitors in the first 45 minutes. Average goals at half-time are 0.44 for Elana and 0.77 for Unia; accounting for average half-time concessions (0.62 and 0.50) the estimated expected half-time goals are about 1.16 (0.53 for the home side and 0.63 for the visitors), so typical HT scores are 0-1 or 1-1. Over the full match Unia is in better form: season-long points per game are 1.47 for the visitors versus 1.19 for Elana, and in the last 5 matches Unia won 60% of fixtures while Elana has 0% wins, increasing the probability of a final success for the visitors. Given Unia’s frequent leads at the break (46% season, 60% in last 5) and Unia’s low average half-time concessions (0.2 in the last 5), the most likely scenario is 2/2 (36%). The second and third scenarios are X/2 (16%) and X/X (12%) — X/2 because the home side has 50% draws at half-time this season, and additionally xG 1.64 (Elana) versus 1.47 (Unia) and shot conversion 9% versus 10% indicate that Elana creates chances, but current form favors Unia maintaining their lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Elana Toruń | Unia Swarzędz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Unia Swarzędz is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Elana Toruń · 2.2 pts / match - Unia Swarzędz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Elana Toruń is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.52 goals / match - Elana Toruń · 1.19 goals / match - Unia Swarzędz
Unia Swarzędz is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - Elana Toruń · 1.16 goals / match - Unia Swarzędz
Elana Toruń scores in 77% of matches (24 of 31 matches), while Unia Swarzędz keeps a clean sheet in 29% (9 of 31 matches).
Unia Swarzędz scores in 55% of matches (17 of 31 matches), while Elana Toruń keeps a clean sheet in 29% (9 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Elana Toruń
Over / Under - Unia Swarzędz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Elana Toruń is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Elana Toruń · 1.35 pts / match - Unia Swarzędz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Elana Toruń - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Unia Swarzędz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Elana Toruń
Unia Swarzędz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).
Teams vs league
| Elana Toruń | Liga | Unia Swarzędz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.90 | 2.94 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 52% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 58% | 57% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 28% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 69% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 74% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Elana Toruń 1 - 0 - 0 Unia Swarzędz. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz?
The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Elana Toruń 0:4 Unia Swarzędz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz?
Elana Toruń score 1.52 goals per game on average and Unia Swarzędz 1.19. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Elana Toruń's matches and 39% of Unia Swarzędz's.
What form are Elana Toruń and Unia Swarzędz in?
Over the last 5 games Elana Toruń have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Unia Swarzędz 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz?
The statistical background for Elana Toruń vs Unia Swarzędz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


