Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen: match statistics
Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Energie Cottbus played Rot-Weiss Essen in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 5:3.
Current form
Energie Cottbus: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Rot-Weiss Essen: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Energie Cottbus scores 1.85 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Rot-Weiss Essen scores 2.09 and concedes 1.55. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Energie Cottbus 67%, Rot-Weiss Essen 82%. Over 2.5: Energie Cottbus 70%, Rot-Weiss Essen 67%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Rot-Weiss Essen has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.69. Energie Cottbus: 13.8 shots per match, Rot-Weiss Essen: 15.5.
Match halves
Energie Cottbus: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.03. Rot-Weiss Essen: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.21.
Goals by minute
Energie Cottbus: 61-75 (13 goals). Rot-Weiss Essen: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Energie Cottbus have strong home credentials: at home they score on average 2.12 goals and concede only 1.24, with a home goal difference of +15. Rot‑Weiss Essen are in excellent form—5 wins in their last 5 matches, 14 goals scored and an average of 3.0 points per match over that run—but they concede on average 1.94 goals away and have only a +1 away goal difference. Situational metrics are comparable: home xG for the hosts is 1.69 versus 1.76 for the visitors on the road, with average shots 13.88 vs 15.00 and shots on target 5.18 vs 5.56, suggesting a similar number of chances. The hosts’ decisive edge is efficiency and defense—home conversion 15% versus 13% for Essen and 24% clean sheets for Cottbus compared to only 6% clean sheets for the visitors away. Considering the superior home record (2.12 scored, 1.24 conceded) and higher efficiency, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high season BTTS rates: Energie Cottbus 76% and Rot-Weiss Essen 88%, versus a league average of 64%, strongly favoring the Both Teams To Score scenario. Goal metrics confirm an offensive profile: Cottbus scores 2.18 and concedes 1.18 per match, Essen scores 2.00 and concedes 1.94; xG for the home side is 1.85 and for the away side 1.76, with xG against the home team 1.63 and against the away team 1.46, totaling around 3.6 expected xG and supporting goal exchange. Clean sheets are rare for the visitors (6% vs 24% for the hosts), and in the last 5 matches Essen has 80% BTTS and 14 goals (2.8 avg) versus Cottbus 40% BTTS and 8 goals (1.6 avg), indicating the visitors regularly score while leaving themselves exposed. Additionally both teams record over 2.5 in 59% (Cottbus) and 75% (Essen) of matches with a league average of 3.13 goals per game; therefore I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 80% versus 20% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Energie Cottbus scores on average 2.18 goals per match, Rot‑Weiss Essen 2.00, and xG is 1.85 (Cottbus) versus 1.76 (Essen), indicating genuine attacking potential on both sides. This season Over 1.5 occurred in 82% of home games and 94% of away games, and BTTS is 76% and 88%, hence a high 88% rating for Over 1.5. Average expected goals calculated as the mean of xG-for and xG-against give 1.66 for Cottbus and 1.69 for Essen (sum 3.35); with that λ the Poisson distribution implies roughly a 65% chance of ≥3 goals, and season Over 2.5 figures are 59%/75%, so I assign Over 2.5 at 68%. The 3.5 line is less certain — season Over 3.5 is 47%/56% (avg ~51%), but expected 3.35 goals yields an estimated ~44% chance of ≥4, therefore Under 3.5 appears safer. In summary, the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5 (pick: Over 2.5), since total xG of 3.35, RWE’s current form (last 5: 14 goals, 2.8 avg) and season Over 2.5 metrics form a coherent, numerically justified argument.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I assess the most likely scenario as the home side leading at the break and winning at full-time (1/1). The home team have led at half-time in 59% of their home matches and score an average of 1.18 goals by the break versus 0.56 for the visitors, while their home win rate is 65% compared to the visitors’ 44%. However, form of Rot‑Weiss Essen must be considered — the visitors have won 100% of their last five matches and led at half-time in 80% of those, and they average 2.69 goals in the second half (vs. 1.65 for the hosts), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround. Both teams frequently score in matches (hosts 76% and visitors 88%), so I also assign moderate chances to scenarios with a post-break reversal (e.g. X/1 13% and 2/2 11%). This distribution reflects the hosts’ dominance in first halves (~53% projected lead at the break) while acknowledging the visitors’ potential for strong second halves.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Energie Cottbus | Rot-Weiss Essen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rot-Weiss Essen is 114% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 3 pts / match - Rot-Weiss Essen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rot-Weiss Essen is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.85 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 2.09 goals / match - Rot-Weiss Essen
Energie Cottbus is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 1.55 goals / match - Rot-Weiss Essen
Energie Cottbus scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Rot-Weiss Essen keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 matches).
Rot-Weiss Essen scores in 94% of matches (31 of 33 matches), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Energie Cottbus
Over / Under - Rot-Weiss Essen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Energie Cottbus is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 1.55 pts / match - Rot-Weiss Essen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Energie Cottbus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rot-Weiss Essen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Energie Cottbus
Rot-Weiss Essen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Energie Cottbus | Liga | Rot-Weiss Essen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 3.10 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 24% | 22% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 82% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Energie Cottbus 1 - 0 - 0 Rot-Weiss Essen. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen?
The 3. Liga match finished Energie Cottbus 5:3 Rot-Weiss Essen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen?
Energie Cottbus score 1.85 goals per game on average and Rot-Weiss Essen 2.09. The 3. Liga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Energie Cottbus's matches and 82% of Rot-Weiss Essen's.
What form are Energie Cottbus and Rot-Weiss Essen in?
Over the last 5 games Energie Cottbus have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Rot-Weiss Essen 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen?
The statistical background for Energie Cottbus vs Rot-Weiss Essen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


