Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: match statistics

Energie Cottbus crest
Energie Cottbus
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Ulm crest
Ulm
165%(1.71)
X22%(3.70)
213%(3.75)

Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.

Energie Cottbus vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Energie Cottbus played Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Energie Cottbus: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ulm: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Energie Cottbus scores 1.86 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Ulm scores 1.31 and concedes 2.10. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Energie Cottbus 72%, Ulm 72%. Over 2.5: Energie Cottbus 72%, Ulm 72%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Energie Cottbus has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.44. Energie Cottbus: 13.7 shots per match, Ulm: 12.0.

Match halves

Energie Cottbus: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.07. Ulm: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Energie Cottbus: 61-75 (12 goals). Ulm: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Energie Cottbus holds a high 2nd position in the table and displays impressive home form with 53% wins at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2.13 goals per match in home games, which, with a solid conversion rate of 16% and an average of 5.27 shots on target per match, makes them a dangerous offensive team. Ulm is in a difficult situation in 18th place, with disastrous away form (64% losses, only 21% wins) and a negative goal difference of -11 in away matches. The visitors have gained only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games, losing 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding as many as 11 goals. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency of both teams clearly points to a certain victory for Energie Cottbus.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
Energie CottbusUlm
14Shots6
Energie CottbusUlm
2Shots on target2
Energie CottbusUlm
1.52xG0.92
Energie CottbusUlm
9Corners7
Energie CottbusUlm
69Dangerous attacks55
Energie CottbusUlm
7Fouls12
Energie CottbusUlm
0Cards3
Energie CottbusUlm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Energie CottbusUlm
1.86Goals scored / match1.31
Energie CottbusUlm
1.48Goals conceded / match2.1
Energie CottbusUlm
51%Average possession51%
Energie CottbusUlm
5.62Shots on target / match3.83
Energie CottbusUlm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.69Shots per match11.97
Energie CottbusUlm
5.62Shots on target3.83
Energie CottbusUlm
13.6%Shot conversion11%
Energie CottbusUlm
51%Possession51%
Energie CottbusUlm
1.69xG for1.44
Energie CottbusUlm
1.5xG against1.62
Energie CottbusUlm

Shooting quality

Energie Cottbus: Efficient finishingUlm: Balanced
Energie CottbusUlm
Accuracy (shots on target)41%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Energie Cottbus is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 0.4 pts / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus
WDWDL
Season result split
52% W28% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-6
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-6-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulm
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W10% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-19
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Energie Cottbus is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.86 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 1.31 goals / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Energie Cottbus · 2.1 goals / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus scoring profile: very strong

Energie Cottbus scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

54Goals scored (season)38
Energie CottbusUlm
43Goals conceded (season)61
Energie CottbusUlm
3.34Average goals in match3.41
Energie CottbusUlm
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Energie CottbusUlm
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
Energie CottbusUlm

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal86%
Energie CottbusUlm
59%2 goals24%
Energie CottbusUlm
34%3 goals14%
Energie CottbusUlm
7%4 goals3%
Energie CottbusUlm

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal86%
Energie CottbusUlm
41%2 goals59%
Energie CottbusUlm
21%3 goals41%
Energie CottbusUlm
7%4 goals14%
Energie CottbusUlm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time31%
Energie CottbusUlm
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Energie CottbusUlm
38%Scored in both halves14%
Energie CottbusUlm

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Energie CottbusUlm
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Energie CottbusUlm
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Energie CottbusUlm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Energie CottbusUlm
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Energie CottbusUlm
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Energie CottbusUlm

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Energie CottbusUlm
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time66%
Energie CottbusUlm
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Energie CottbusUlm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Energie Cottbus is 110% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.66 pts / match - Energie Cottbus · 0.79 pts / match - Ulm

Energie Cottbus - half-time state
41% leading41% draw17% trailing
Ulm - half-time state
14% leading38% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.66Points per match (1st half)0.79
Energie CottbusUlm
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Energie CottbusUlm
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.97
Energie CottbusUlm
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.45
Energie CottbusUlm
59%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Energie CottbusUlm
45%No goal before half-time59%
Energie CottbusUlm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)0.9
Energie CottbusUlm
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Energie CottbusUlm
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)1.14
Energie CottbusUlm
2Average goals (2nd half)1.97
Energie CottbusUlm
41%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Energie CottbusUlm
34%No goal after half-time41%
Energie CottbusUlm

Energie Cottbus - second-half results

38% W28% R34% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulm - second-half results

17% W38% R45% P
23
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Energie Cottbus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ulm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Energie Cottbus
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
9
5
31-45
8
4
46-60
12
10
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
2
9
0-15
5
12
16-30
7
7
31-45
10
9
46-60
4
11
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Energie Cottbus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Energie CottbusLigaUlm
Average goals in match 3.343.13 3.41
Both teams scored 72%64% 72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%63% 72%
Clean sheets 21%22% 14%
Goal before half-time 69%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Can Yaha MoustfaOff: Moritz Hannemann
  2. UlmYellow cardLuca Bazzoli
  3. UlmYellow cardMarcel Seegert
  4. Energie CottbusGoalErik EngelhardtAssist: Merveille Biankadi
  5. Energie CottbusSubstitutionOn: Jannis boziarisOff: Lukas Michelbrink
  6. UlmYellow cardDennis Dressel
  7. UlmSubstitutionOn: Elias LöderOff: Leon Dajaku

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Daniel BartnitzkiMatches officiated: 12
5.08Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins33%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Energie Cottbus 1 - 0 - 0 Ulm. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

SSV Ulm 1846
1 : 2
FC Energie Cottbus

FAQ

What was the result of Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

The 3. Liga match finished Energie Cottbus 1:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

Energie Cottbus score 1.86 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.31. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Energie Cottbus's matches and 72% of Ulm's.

What form are Energie Cottbus and Ulm in?

Over the last 5 games Energie Cottbus have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ulm 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm?

The statistical background for Energie Cottbus vs Ulm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.