Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

ENPPI vs Zamalek: match statistics

ENPPI crest
ENPPI
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Zamalek crest
Zamalek
125%(4.40)
X25%(3.10)
250%(1.80)

As the league leader, Zamalek presents a significantly higher form and efficiency than ENPPI. The visitors boast an impressive record of 13 wins with just 2 defeats this season, and their form in the last 5 matches (4 wins) confirms their stability. ENPPI sits only in 8th place in the table and tends to draw (33% draws at home), which may complicate an easy victory for Zamalek. The visitors' key advantage is their attacking efficiency - averaging 1.89 goals per away match with 0% of matches without scoring, whereas ENPPI averages only 1 goal scored at home. The difference in team quality (+8 vs +2 goal difference) and Zamalek's 67% away win rate strongly support an away victory, although the hosts' solid defense (56% clean sheets) may make it a tightly contested match.

ENPPI vs Zamalek: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ENPPI play Zamalek in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 11 March 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Zamalek: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

ENPPI scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Zamalek scores 1.50 and concedes 0.65. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ENPPI 46%, Zamalek 38%. Over 2.5: ENPPI 35%, Zamalek 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Zamalek has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.14. ENPPI: 9.0 shots per match, Zamalek: 13.3.

Match halves

ENPPI: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.54. Zamalek: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

ENPPI: 76-90+ (7 goals). Zamalek: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

As the league leader, Zamalek presents a significantly higher form and efficiency than ENPPI. The visitors boast an impressive record of 13 wins with just 2 defeats this season, and their form in the last 5 matches (4 wins) confirms their stability. ENPPI sits only in 8th place in the table and tends to draw (33% draws at home), which may complicate an easy victory for Zamalek. The visitors' key advantage is their attacking efficiency - averaging 1.89 goals per away match with 0% of matches without scoring, whereas ENPPI averages only 1 goal scored at home. The difference in team quality (+8 vs +2 goal difference) and Zamalek's 67% away win rate strongly support an away victory, although the hosts' solid defense (56% clean sheets) may make it a tightly contested match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
ENPPIZamalek
13Shots11
ENPPIZamalek
3Shots on target1
ENPPIZamalek
1.36xG1.25
ENPPIZamalek
5Corners4
ENPPIZamalek
45Dangerous attacks67
ENPPIZamalek
10Fouls17
ENPPIZamalek
1Cards2
ENPPIZamalek

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.04Goals scored / match1.5
ENPPIZamalek
0.96Goals conceded / match0.65
ENPPIZamalek
50%Average possession53%
ENPPIZamalek
3.12Shots on target / match4.69
ENPPIZamalek

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match13.27
ENPPIZamalek
3.12Shots on target4.69
ENPPIZamalek
11.5%Shot conversion11.3%
ENPPIZamalek
50%Possession53%
ENPPIZamalek
1.14xG for1.47
ENPPIZamalek
1.31xG against1.1
ENPPIZamalek

Shooting quality

ENPPI: BalancedZamalek: Balanced
ENPPIZamalek
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zamalek is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - ENPPI · 2 pts / match - Zamalek

ENPPI
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Zamalek
WDLWW
Season result split
65% W19% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-4
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-1-3
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zamalek is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - ENPPI · 1.5 goals / match - Zamalek

Zamalek is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - ENPPI · 0.65 goals / match - Zamalek

ENPPI scoring profile: mixed

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).

Zamalek scoring profile: strong

Zamalek scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

27Goals scored (season)39
ENPPIZamalek
25Goals conceded (season)17
ENPPIZamalek
2Average goals in match2.15
ENPPIZamalek
5Goals scored (last 5)3
ENPPIZamalek
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
ENPPIZamalek

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal85%
ENPPIZamalek
27%2 goals38%
ENPPIZamalek
8%3 goals15%
ENPPIZamalek
0%4 goals8%
ENPPIZamalek

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal46%
ENPPIZamalek
31%2 goals15%
ENPPIZamalek
8%3 goals4%
ENPPIZamalek
0%4 goals0%
ENPPIZamalek

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time12%
ENPPIZamalek
0%BTTS in both halves4%
ENPPIZamalek
15%Scored in both halves27%
ENPPIZamalek

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
ENPPIZamalek
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ENPPIZamalek
60%BTTS - last 50%
ENPPIZamalek

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
ENPPIZamalek
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
ENPPIZamalek
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
ENPPIZamalek

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
ENPPIZamalek
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ENPPIZamalek
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
ENPPIZamalek

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zamalek is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - ENPPI · 2 pts / match - Zamalek

ENPPI - half-time state
27% leading42% draw31% trailing
Zamalek - half-time state
54% leading38% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)2
ENPPIZamalek
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.69
ENPPIZamalek
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
ENPPIZamalek
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.92
ENPPIZamalek
58%Clean sheet before half-time81%
ENPPIZamalek
58%No goal before half-time42%
ENPPIZamalek

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.73
ENPPIZamalek
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
ENPPIZamalek
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
ENPPIZamalek
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.23
ENPPIZamalek
69%Clean sheet after half-time65%
ENPPIZamalek
58%No goal after half-time46%
ENPPIZamalek

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zamalek - second-half results

46% W35% R19% P
52
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Zamalek - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Zamalek
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
5
6
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Zamalek

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ENPPILigaZamalek
Average goals in match 2.002.02 2.15
Both teams scored 46%47% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%34% 35%
Clean sheets 42%35% 54%
Goal before half-time 65%58% 65%
Goal after half-time 62%70% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: ENPPI 0 - 1 - 0 Zamalek. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of ENPPI vs Zamalek?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished ENPPI 1:0 Zamalek. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ENPPI vs Zamalek?

ENPPI score 1.04 goals per game on average and Zamalek 1.50. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 46% of ENPPI's matches and 38% of Zamalek's.

What form are ENPPI and Zamalek in?

Over the last 5 games ENPPI have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Zamalek 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ENPPI vs Zamalek?

The statistical background for ENPPI vs Zamalek — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.