Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance: match statistics
Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Enugu Rangers played Bendel Insurance in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Enugu Rangers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Bendel Insurance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Enugu Rangers scores 1.19 and concedes 0.69 goals per match. Bendel Insurance scores 1.17 and concedes 0.97. League average: 1.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Enugu Rangers 33%, Bendel Insurance 42%. Over 2.5: Enugu Rangers 31%, Bendel Insurance 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Bendel Insurance has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.33. Enugu Rangers: 5.2 shots per match, Bendel Insurance: 7.2.
Match halves
Enugu Rangers: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.50. Bendel Insurance: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Enugu Rangers: 16-30 (10 goals). Bendel Insurance: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Enugu Rangers are clear favorites: they sit 1st in the table, have 17 wins this season versus Bendel’s 14, and win 78% of home matches with no home defeats (home loss rate 0%). Their home defence is very solid — they concede only 0.33 goals per game on average and keep clean sheets in 72% of matches, whereas Bendel concede 1.28 goals per game away and record only 28% clean sheets. In attack Enugu score 1.72 goals per game at home with xG 1.67, averaging 12.13 shots and 5.25 on target (conversion 18%), while Bendel average only 0.78 goals away with xG 1.22, 10.5 shots and 3.7 on target (conversion 10%) and fail to score in 50% of away matches. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 5 goals, but Bendel have conceded 7 compared to Enugu’s 4, highlighting the visitors’ defensive issues. Therefore I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 70% Enugu, 20% draw and 10% Bendel win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Enugu Rangers average 1.56 goals per match while Bendel Insurance only 0.78 (1.56 vs 0.78), indicating a clear home advantage in chance creation. Enugu keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and concede less frequently than others, while Bendel fail to score in 50% of their games (Bendel clean sheets 28%, no goal 50%), which strongly reduces the probability of BTTS. Seasonal BTTS rates are 44% for home teams and 39% for away teams, with a league average BTTS of 38% and 40% in the last 5 matches for both sides — all these values are under half of matches. xG shows 1.77 xG_for for Enugu versus 1.22 for Bendel and xG_against 1.04 for Enugu and 1.66 for Bendel; despite an xG of 1.22 the visitors convert only 0.78 goals, indicating finishing issues. Considering 50% clean sheets for the hosts, 50% of matches without a goal from the visitors and seasonal BTTS ~38–44%, I give a clear edge to the "No" scenario (70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of around 2.30 goals: Enugu Rangers 1.48 and Bendel Insurance 0.82, which positions the match below the 2.5 line. Enugu at home averages 1.56 goals and has an xG of 1.77, but concedes only 0.67 and keeps 50% clean sheets, limiting the risk of a high-scoring game. Bendel away averages 0.78 goals, has xG_for 1.22 and xG_against 1.66, and both teams have only 33% of season matches over 2.5 goals. The league averages 1.99 goals per match, and in the last 5 meetings each side has averaged 1.0 goal per game, so I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at about 40% (Under ~60%). Based on this, I flag Under 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Enugu Rangers possess a clear home advantage: they average 1.56 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per home match, while Bendel Insurance record 0.78 scored and 1.28 conceded on the road; consequently the home side win 56% of matches versus 22% for the visitors. At Half-Time the most common state is a draw — the home team were level at the break in 67% of fixtures, the visitors in 61%, and a lead for the hosts at Half-Time occurs in only 28% of cases. After the break Enugu dominate: they average 1.11 goals in the second half, win the second half in 44% of matches and have accumulated 32 points in second halves versus 13 points for the visitors, while the away side win the second half in only 11% and have a -11 goal differential in second halves. Additionally, xG of 1.77 for the hosts versus 1.22 for the guests and 5.0 on-target shots vs 3.7 indicate Enugu create more chances, increasing the probability of turning a Half-Time draw into a home victory; therefore the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at Half-Time and home win at Full-Time (X/1) is assigned the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Enugu Rangers | Bendel Insurance | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.67 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bendel Insurance is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Enugu Rangers · 2 pts / match - Bendel Insurance
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Enugu Rangers is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.69 goals / match - Enugu Rangers · 0.97 goals / match - Bendel Insurance
Enugu Rangers scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while Bendel Insurance keeps a clean sheet in 39% (14 of 36 matches).
Bendel Insurance scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while Enugu Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 56% (20 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Enugu Rangers
Over / Under - Bendel Insurance
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Enugu Rangers is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Enugu Rangers · 1.39 pts / match - Bendel Insurance
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Enugu Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bendel Insurance - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Enugu Rangers
Bendel Insurance
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Enugu Rangers | Liga | Bendel Insurance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.89 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 33% | • 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 37% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 60% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Enugu Rangers 0 - 1 - 0 Bendel Insurance. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance?
The NPFL match finished Enugu Rangers 2:1 Bendel Insurance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance?
Enugu Rangers score 1.19 goals per game on average and Bendel Insurance 1.17. The NPFL average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Enugu Rangers's matches and 42% of Bendel Insurance's.
What form are Enugu Rangers and Bendel Insurance in?
Over the last 5 games Enugu Rangers have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Bendel Insurance 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance?
The statistical background for Enugu Rangers vs Bendel Insurance — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


