Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 12 September 2026

Enyimba vs Barau: match statistics

Enyimba crest
Enyimba
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Barau crest
Barau
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Enyimba displays a significantly better home form with a 60% win rate and a goal difference of +8 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.7, giving them a solid offensive-defensive advantage. Barau, on the other hand, performs very poorly away – only a 10% win rate, 80% of matches without scoring a goal, and a catastrophic goal difference of -10 in away fixtures. Moreover, the visitors score only 0.4 goals on average away while conceding 1.4, which, combined with Enyimba's possession dominance (53% vs 47%) and higher xG (1.46 vs 0.98), points to a clear home victory. The recent form over the last five matches also favors Enyimba, who have earned 6 more points than Barau during this period.

Enyimba vs Barau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Enyimba played Barau in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Enyimba: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Barau: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Enyimba scores 1.20 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Barau scores 0.90 and concedes 1.10. League average: 1.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Enyimba 45%, Barau 35%. Over 2.5: Enyimba 50%, Barau 25%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Barau has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.11. Enyimba: 6.3 shots per match, Barau: 5.2.

Match halves

Enyimba: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.65. Barau: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Enyimba: 61-75 (6 goals). Barau: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 1.84 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Enyimba displays a significantly better home form with a 60% win rate and a goal difference of +8 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.7, giving them a solid offensive-defensive advantage. Barau, on the other hand, performs very poorly away – only a 10% win rate, 80% of matches without scoring a goal, and a catastrophic goal difference of -10 in away fixtures. Moreover, the visitors score only 0.4 goals on average away while conceding 1.4, which, combined with Enyimba's possession dominance (53% vs 47%) and higher xG (1.46 vs 0.98), points to a clear home victory. The recent form over the last five matches also favors Enyimba, who have earned 6 more points than Barau during this period.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
EnyimbaBarau
22Shots12
EnyimbaBarau
4Shots on target2
EnyimbaBarau
2.03xG1.07
EnyimbaBarau
8Corners3
EnyimbaBarau
51Dangerous attacks23
EnyimbaBarau
9Fouls13
EnyimbaBarau
0Cards2
EnyimbaBarau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match0.9
EnyimbaBarau
1.1Goals conceded / match1.1
EnyimbaBarau
42%Average possession26%
EnyimbaBarau
2.25Shots on target / match1.25
EnyimbaBarau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.25Shots per match5.15
EnyimbaBarau
2.25Shots on target1.25
EnyimbaBarau
19.2%Shot conversion17.5%
EnyimbaBarau
42%Possession26%
EnyimbaBarau
1.11xG for1.29
EnyimbaBarau
1.28xG against1.23
EnyimbaBarau

Shooting quality

Enyimba: Counter-attackingBarau: Counter-attacking
EnyimbaBarau
Accuracy (shots on target)36%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.25
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.530.72

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Barau is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Enyimba · 1.4 pts / match - Barau

Enyimba
LWLWL
Season result split
35% W25% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-8
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Barau
LWDLW
Season result split
30% W30% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-8
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Enyimba is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Enyimba · 0.9 goals / match - Barau

Enyimba scoring profile: strong

Enyimba scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Barau keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

Barau scoring profile: mixed

Barau scores in 40% of matches (8 of 20 matches), while Enyimba keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

24Goals scored (season)18
EnyimbaBarau
22Goals conceded (season)22
EnyimbaBarau
2.3Average goals in match2
EnyimbaBarau
9Goals scored (last 5)6
EnyimbaBarau
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
EnyimbaBarau

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal40%
EnyimbaBarau
40%2 goals30%
EnyimbaBarau
15%3 goals15%
EnyimbaBarau
0%4 goals5%
EnyimbaBarau

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal75%
EnyimbaBarau
35%2 goals35%
EnyimbaBarau
15%3 goals0%
EnyimbaBarau
0%4 goals0%
EnyimbaBarau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
EnyimbaBarau
10%BTTS in both halves5%
EnyimbaBarau
25%Scored in both halves25%
EnyimbaBarau

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
EnyimbaBarau
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
EnyimbaBarau
60%BTTS - last 540%
EnyimbaBarau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
EnyimbaBarau
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
EnyimbaBarau
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
EnyimbaBarau

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
EnyimbaBarau
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
EnyimbaBarau
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
EnyimbaBarau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Enyimba is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Enyimba · 1.05 pts / match - Barau

Enyimba - half-time state
20% leading55% draw25% trailing
Barau - half-time state
20% leading45% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.05
EnyimbaBarau
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.4
EnyimbaBarau
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
EnyimbaBarau
1.1Average goals (1st half)1
EnyimbaBarau
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
EnyimbaBarau
50%No goal before half-time70%
EnyimbaBarau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.25
EnyimbaBarau
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
EnyimbaBarau
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
EnyimbaBarau
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1
EnyimbaBarau
60%Clean sheet after half-time65%
EnyimbaBarau
60%No goal after half-time65%
EnyimbaBarau

Enyimba - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Barau - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Enyimba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Barau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Enyimba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Barau
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Enyimba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
190%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Barau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

EnyimbaLigaBarau
Average goals in match 2.301.84 2.00
Both teams scored 45%36% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%27% 25%
Clean sheets 40%38% 25%
Goal before half-time 65%62% 65%
Goal after half-time 55%58% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.84
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+116%
Home attack advantage
+54%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BarauYellow cardUche Moses
  2. EnyimbaSubstitutionOn: Augustine NwaorisaOff: Stanley Sopuruchi Dimgba
  3. BarauYellow cardUche Moses
  4. BarauSubstitutionOn: Hilary EkawuOff: Sunday Anthony
  5. EnyimbaSubstitutionOn: Emeka OnyemaOff: Salman Abubakar

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Enyimba 0 - 1 - 0 Barau. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Barau
0 : 0
Enyimba

FAQ

What was the result of Enyimba vs Barau?

The NPFL match finished Enyimba 0:0 Barau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Enyimba vs Barau?

Enyimba score 1.20 goals per game on average and Barau 0.90. The NPFL average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Enyimba's matches and 35% of Barau's.

What form are Enyimba and Barau in?

Over the last 5 games Enyimba have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Barau 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Enyimba vs Barau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.