Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 12 September 2026

Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat: match statistics

Enyimba crest
Enyimba
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Kun Khalifat crest
Kun Khalifat
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Enyimba clearly dominates in home matches, achieving a 54% win rate and maintaining a +8 goal difference, with an average of 1.23 goals per game. The hosts boast significantly better offensive statistics at home (xG 1.53) and a solid defense (54% clean sheets). Kun Khalifat shows very poor away form with only an 8% away win rate, scoring on average just 0.54 goals with 54% of matches failing to score. The visitors concede an average of 1.38 goals away and have a negative -11 goal difference in away matches. Despite Kun Khalifat's recent good overall run (3 wins in the last 5 matches), their catastrophic away form (only 1 win in the last 13 away matches) speaks decisively in favor of the hosts.

Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Enyimba played Kun Khalifat in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Enyimba: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kun Khalifat: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Enyimba scores 1.00 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Kun Khalifat scores 0.85 and concedes 1.15. League average: 1.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Enyimba 41%, Kun Khalifat 44%. Over 2.5: Enyimba 37%, Kun Khalifat 30%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 25%.

xG, shots and style

Enyimba has higher xG: 1.20 vs 1.16. Enyimba: 6.8 shots per match, Kun Khalifat: 5.4.

Match halves

Enyimba: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.56. Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Enyimba: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kun Khalifat: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 1.82 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 25%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Enyimba clearly dominates in home matches, achieving a 54% win rate and maintaining a +8 goal difference, with an average of 1.23 goals per game. The hosts boast significantly better offensive statistics at home (xG 1.53) and a solid defense (54% clean sheets). Kun Khalifat shows very poor away form with only an 8% away win rate, scoring on average just 0.54 goals with 54% of matches failing to score. The visitors concede an average of 1.38 goals away and have a negative -11 goal difference in away matches. Despite Kun Khalifat's recent good overall run (3 wins in the last 5 matches), their catastrophic away form (only 1 win in the last 13 away matches) speaks decisively in favor of the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
-1Shots-1
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
-1Shots on target-1
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0xG0
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
-1Corners-1
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0Dangerous attacks0
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
-1Fouls-1
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1Cards0
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1Goals scored / match0.85
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1.07Goals conceded / match1.15
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
40%Average possession32%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
2.19Shots on target / match1.44
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.81Shots per match5.37
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
2.19Shots on target1.44
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
14.7%Shot conversion15.9%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
40%Possession32%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1.2xG for1.16
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1.35xG against1.34
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Shooting quality

Enyimba: Counter-attackingKun Khalifat: Counter-attacking
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
Accuracy (shots on target)32%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.59

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kun Khalifat is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Enyimba · 1.8 pts / match - Kun Khalifat

Enyimba
DWLLD
Season result split
30% W30% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-11
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Kun Khalifat
WLWLW
Season result split
26% W26% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-13
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Enyimba is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Enyimba · 0.85 goals / match - Kun Khalifat

Enyimba is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Enyimba · 1.15 goals / match - Kun Khalifat

Enyimba scoring profile: strong

Enyimba scores in 59% of matches (16 of 27 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).

Kun Khalifat scoring profile: strong

Kun Khalifat scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Enyimba keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).

27Goals scored (season)23
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
29Goals conceded (season)31
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
2.07Average goals in match2
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
3Goals scored (last 5)5
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal63%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
30%2 goals19%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
11%3 goals4%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0%4 goals0%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal74%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
33%2 goals33%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
11%3 goals7%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0%4 goals0%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time11%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
7%BTTS in both halves0%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
19%Scored in both halves7%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
40%BTTS - last 50%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Enyimba - half-time state
15% leading59% draw26% trailing
Kun Khalifat - half-time state
19% leading48% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.04
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.33
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0.96Average goals (1st half)0.78
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
59%No goal before half-time70%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.33
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.11
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
59%Clean sheet after half-time52%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat
63%No goal after half-time59%
EnyimbaKun Khalifat

Enyimba - second-half results

19% W59% D22% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kun Khalifat - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
28
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Enyimba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kun Khalifat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Enyimba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
7
31-45
1
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kun Khalifat
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Enyimba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
195%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Kun Khalifat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

EnyimbaLigaKun Khalifat
Average goals in match 2.071.82 2.00
Both teams scored 41%35% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%25% 30%
Clean sheets 37%39% 26%
Goal before half-time 59%60% 59%
Goal after half-time 56%59% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.82
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
0.55
Away goals / match
+131%
Home attack advantage
+57%
Home defence advantage
+46%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EnyimbaGoalEkene Awazie
  2. EnyimbaYellow cardSalman Abubakar

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Enyimba 0 - 0 - 1 Kun Khalifat. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kun Khalifat
1 : 0
Enyimba

FAQ

What was the result of Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat?

The NPFL match finished Enyimba 1:1 Kun Khalifat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat?

Enyimba score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kun Khalifat 0.85. The NPFL average is 1.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Enyimba's matches and 44% of Kun Khalifat's.

What form are Enyimba and Kun Khalifat in?

Over the last 5 games Enyimba have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kun Khalifat 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat?

The statistical background for Enyimba vs Kun Khalifat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.