Cyprus - Second DivisionStadio Antonis PapadopoulosData current as of 03 November 2026

Ermis vs PAEEK: match statistics

Ermis crest
Ermis
1 : 2half-time 1:1
PAEEK crest
PAEEK

Ermis vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ermis played PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Antonis Papadopoulos. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Ermis: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. PAEEK: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ermis scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. PAEEK scores 2.00 and concedes 4.00. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ermis 0%, PAEEK 100%. Over 2.5: Ermis 0%, PAEEK 100%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Ermis has higher xG: 1.43 vs 0.00. Ermis: 10.0 shots per match, PAEEK: -1.0.

Match halves

Ermis: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. PAEEK: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Ermis: 0-15 (1 goals). PAEEK: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ermis come into this match with three wins, one draw and one defeat in their last five games, scoring 6 goals and conceding just 2 during that spell. The hosts won their only home match so far 2:0, while their average xG stands at 1.43 compared with just 0.92 xG conceded to opponents, indicating control over the quality of chances at both ends of the pitch. PAEEK have failed to win any of their last five matches, recording three draws and two defeats, with a goal tally of 8 scored and as many as 13 conceded over that period. The visitors are capable of finding the net, but following a 2:4 defeat in their season opener and a vulnerable defensive display in recent matches, they should struggle to contain an effective Ermis side that has averaged 8 shots on target from 10 attempts at home. A home win is the most likely outcome, although a draw remains a realistic possibility given PAEEK’s three draws in their last five appearances.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams score in only 38% of league matches, while clean sheets occur in as many as 75% of games. Ermis have conceded just 0.4 goals on average across their last 5 appearances and allowed opponents only 0.13 xG, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those matches. PAEEK have indeed averaged 1.6 goals recently, but their average xG is only 0.58, suggesting limited quality in the chances created against such a well-organized home defense. The visitors, however, have conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match in their last 5 fixtures, making an Ermis goal without one of the teams scoring the most likely scenario. Seasonal indicators are highly divergent, so greater weight should be given to current form and the exceptionally low number of chances allowed by Ermis.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ermis have averaged 1.2 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded over their last five matches, clearly limiting the opponent’s scoring potential. PAEEK have scored 1.6 goals per game during this period, but have also allowed 2.6, giving the hosts a stronger basis to score around 1.5 goals. Despite PAEEK’s defensive weaknesses, none of Ermis’ last five matches featured at least three goals, while this occurred in 60% of PAEEK’s matches. In addition, the average xG over the last five matches stands at 1.10 for Ermis and just 0.58 for PAEEK, indicating moderate overall attacking potential. The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals, as the 2.25-goal projection provides a clear margin before the four-goal threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Ermis victory at the final whistle. In their last five matches, Ermis were level at the break in 60% of games, while PAEEK recorded a half-time draw in as many as 80%, clearly strengthening the X at half-time variant. However, the hosts are significantly more effective over the full 90 minutes: they won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.0 points, whereas PAEEK failed to win any match and averaged just 0.6 points. Ermis’s advantage after the break is further supported by an average of 1.0 goals scored and only 0.2 conceded in second halves, compared with PAEEK’s averages of 0.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded. The visitors conceded an average of 2.6 goals per match in their latest run, compared with just 0.4 for Ermis; therefore, after an even start, a turnaround in favour of the hosts is more likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
ErmisPAEEK
8Shots8
ErmisPAEEK
5Shots on target5
ErmisPAEEK
1.4xG1.21
ErmisPAEEK
2Corners2
ErmisPAEEK
74Dangerous attacks49
ErmisPAEEK
12Fouls19
ErmisPAEEK
0Cards0
ErmisPAEEK

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match2
ErmisPAEEK
0Goals conceded / match4
ErmisPAEEK
50%Average possession-1%
ErmisPAEEK
8Shots on target / match-1
ErmisPAEEK

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match-1
ErmisPAEEK
8Shots on target-1
ErmisPAEEK
20%Shot conversion-200%
ErmisPAEEK
50%Possession-1%
ErmisPAEEK
1.43xG for0
ErmisPAEEK
0.92xG against0
ErmisPAEEK

Shooting quality

Ermis: Efficient finishingPAEEK: Balanced
ErmisPAEEK
Accuracy (shots on target)80%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ermis
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
PAEEK
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ermis scoring profile: very strong

Ermis scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

PAEEK scoring profile: mixed

PAEEK scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Ermis keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
ErmisPAEEK
0Goals conceded (season)4
ErmisPAEEK
2Average goals in match6
ErmisPAEEK
2Goals scored (last 5)2
ErmisPAEEK
0Goals conceded (last 5)4
ErmisPAEEK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
ErmisPAEEK
100%2 goals100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%3 goals0%
ErmisPAEEK
0%4 goals0%
ErmisPAEEK

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%2 goals100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%3 goals100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%4 goals100%
ErmisPAEEK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%BTTS in both halves100%
ErmisPAEEK
100%Scored in both halves100%
ErmisPAEEK

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ErmisPAEEK
0%BTTS - last 5100%
ErmisPAEEK

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ErmisPAEEK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
ErmisPAEEK

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ermis is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - Ermis · 1 pts / match - PAEEK

Ermis - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
PAEEK - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1
ErmisPAEEK
1Goals scored (1st half)1
ErmisPAEEK
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
ErmisPAEEK
1Average goals (1st half)2
ErmisPAEEK
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
ErmisPAEEK
0%No goal before half-time0%
ErmisPAEEK

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0
ErmisPAEEK
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
ErmisPAEEK
0Goals conceded (2nd half)3
ErmisPAEEK
1Average goals (2nd half)4
ErmisPAEEK
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
ErmisPAEEK
0%No goal after half-time0%
ErmisPAEEK

Ermis - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PAEEK - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+2.0

Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ermis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.03.0
Average goals in match2.04.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ermis
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
3.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
150%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ermis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-4.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
301%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ErmisLigaPAEEK
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.67▲ 6.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%47%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%47%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 100%33%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%60%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%80%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Konstantinos Michailidis⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Giorgos Pavlides⚽ 2

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PAEEKGoalGiorgos Pavlides
  2. ErmisGoalKonstantinos Michailidis
  3. PAEEKGoalGiorgos Pavlides

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ermis vs PAEEK?

The Second Division match finished Ermis 1:2 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ermis vs PAEEK?

Ermis score 2.00 goals per game on average and PAEEK 2.00. The Second Division average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Ermis's matches and 100% of PAEEK's.

What form are Ermis and PAEEK in?

Over the last 5 games Ermis have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and PAEEK 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ermis vs PAEEK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.