ES Sétif vs JS Kabylie: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ES Sétif played JS Kabylie in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 19 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

ES Sétif: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. JS Kabylie: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

ES Sétif scores 0.82 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. JS Kabylie scores 1.20 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ES Sétif 64%, JS Kabylie 50%. Over 2.5: ES Sétif 27%, JS Kabylie 40%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

JS Kabylie has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. ES Sétif: 10.1 shots per match, JS Kabylie: 11.4.

Match halves

ES Sétif: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.64. JS Kabylie: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

ES Sétif: 46-60 (4 goals). JS Kabylie: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 1: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
ES SétifJS Kabylie
9Shots7
ES SétifJS Kabylie
6Shots on target1
ES SétifJS Kabylie
1.28xG0.87
ES SétifJS Kabylie
4Corners6
ES SétifJS Kabylie
40Dangerous attacks49
ES SétifJS Kabylie
17Fouls18
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0Cards1
ES SétifJS Kabylie

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.82Goals scored / match1.2
ES SétifJS Kabylie
1.18Goals conceded / match1
ES SétifJS Kabylie
54%Average possession55%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
3.64Shots on target / match5.1
ES SétifJS Kabylie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.09Shots per match11.4
ES SétifJS Kabylie
3.64Shots on target5.1
ES SétifJS Kabylie
8.1%Shot conversion10.5%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
54%Possession55%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
1.34xG for1.49
ES SétifJS Kabylie
1.42xG against1.18
ES SétifJS Kabylie

Shooting quality

ES Sétif: BalancedJS Kabylie: Balanced
ES SétifJS Kabylie
Accuracy (shots on target)36%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JS Kabylie is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - ES Sétif · 1.4 pts / match - JS Kabylie

ES Sétif
DLWDD
Season result split
18% W55% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-3
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
JS Kabylie
WDWLL
Season result split
40% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JS Kabylie is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - ES Sétif · 1.2 goals / match - JS Kabylie

JS Kabylie is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - ES Sétif · 1 goals / match - JS Kabylie

ES Sétif scoring profile: strong

ES Sétif scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while JS Kabylie keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

JS Kabylie scoring profile: very strong

JS Kabylie scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while ES Sétif keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

9Goals scored (season)12
ES SétifJS Kabylie
13Goals conceded (season)10
ES SétifJS Kabylie
2Average goals in match2.2
ES SétifJS Kabylie
4Goals scored (last 5)8
ES SétifJS Kabylie
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
ES SétifJS Kabylie

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal70%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
9%2 goals30%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%3 goals10%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%4 goals10%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal70%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
18%2 goals30%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
18%3 goals0%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%4 goals0%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time20%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%Scored in both halves20%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
60%BTTS - last 560%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JS Kabylie is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / match - ES Sétif · 1.3 pts / match - JS Kabylie

ES Sétif - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing
JS Kabylie - half-time state
20% leading70% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per match (1st half)1.3
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.4
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.73Average goals (1st half)0.7
ES SétifJS Kabylie
55%Clean sheet before half-time70%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
82%No goal before half-time60%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.4
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
ES SétifJS Kabylie
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
ES SétifJS Kabylie
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.5
ES SétifJS Kabylie
45%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ES SétifJS Kabylie
45%No goal after half-time50%
ES SétifJS Kabylie

ES Sétif - second-half results

18% W64% D18% L
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JS Kabylie - second-half results

30% W50% D20% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ES Sétif - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
JS Kabylie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.42.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ES Sétif
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
5
16-30
2
0
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

JS Kabylie
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ES Sétif

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

JS Kabylie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

ES SétifLigaJS Kabylie
Average goals in match 2.002.02 2.20
Both teams scored 64%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%32% 40%
Clean sheets 18%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 55%64% 50%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
0.85
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JS KabylieSubstitutionOn: Aimen Abdelaziz LahmeriOff: Lahlou Akhrib

FAQ

What was the result of ES Sétif vs JS Kabylie?

The Ligue 1 match finished ES Sétif 1:0 JS Kabylie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ES Sétif vs JS Kabylie?

ES Sétif score 0.82 goals per game on average and JS Kabylie 1.20. The Ligue 1 average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 64% of ES Sétif's matches and 50% of JS Kabylie's.

What form are ES Sétif and JS Kabylie in?

Over the last 5 games ES Sétif have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and JS Kabylie 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ES Sétif vs JS Kabylie?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.