Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion IvailoData current as of 17 October 2026

Etar vs Rilski Sportist: match statistics

Etar crest
Etar
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Rilski Sportist crest
Rilski Sportist

Etar vs Rilski Sportist: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Etar played Rilski Sportist in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Ivailo. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Etar: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Rilski Sportist: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Etar scores 2.67 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Rilski Sportist scores 0.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Etar 67%, Rilski Sportist 33%. Over 2.5: Etar 67%, Rilski Sportist 33%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Etar has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.76. Etar: 13.7 shots per match, Rilski Sportist: 14.7.

Match halves

Etar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.67. Rilski Sportist: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Etar: 31-45+ (2 goals). Rilski Sportist: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Etar are top of the home table and have won all 3 of their matches so far this season, while also recording 4 wins in their last five games. At home, the hosts average 1.5 goals, create chances worth 1.77 xG and maintain 64% possession, whereas Rilski Sportist have yet to score away from home. The visitors lost their only away match so far, failed to score and allowed their opponents 1.99 xG per game. Etar concede just 0.5 goals per home match and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, which, combined with the visitors’ poor finishing, significantly strengthens the case for a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The “No” selection is more likely primarily due to Rilski Sportist’s very poor finishing: the visitors have not scored a single goal on average this season, and they have failed to find the net in 100% of their matches so far. Etar are in good defensive form, conceding an average of only 0.6 goals over their last 5 matches, with 3 goals conceded in total. The hosts should create chances, as they generate an average xG of 2.02 and record 5 shots on target per match, while the visitors’ defence allows opponents an xG of 1.99. Although Rilski recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches and generated an xG of 1.75, their average of 1.0 goals scored and clear season-long lack of efficiency limit their chances of finding the net. The most realistic scenario is an Etar win to nil, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Etar have scored an average of 1.8 goals and created chances worth 2.00 xG over their last five matches, while Rilski Sportist conceded 1.4 goals per game during this period. The hosts also hold a clear advantage in attacking activity, averaging 16.5 shots and 5.0 shots on target, compared with 11.0 and 3.0 for the visitors. Rilski Sportist have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match this season, with an average xG against of 1.99, which supports the expectation of at least two Etar goals. The visitors have so far scored just 0.0 goals per game, limiting their offensive contribution and the potential of higher goal lines, despite their xG rising to 1.75 across their last five appearances. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.60 goals combines the hosts' strong scoring form with the visitors' very poor defensive record this season.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Etar win at full-time (X/1), as the hosts were level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, while Rilski Sportist recorded this outcome in 67% of such games. The opening stages should be cautious: Etar averaged 0.6 goals before half-time, while the visitors averaged just 0.33, with the two teams recording only 1.2 and 1.0 goals on average in their first halves, respectively. After the break, Etar’s advantage grows significantly, having scored an average of 1.2 goals and conceded none in their last five matches, compared with Rilski’s 0.33 goals scored and 0.67 conceded. The hosts’ recent form also supports a full-time win: Etar won 4 of their last 5 matches and have an average xG of 2.02, compared with the opponents’ average xG conceded of 1.99, while the visitors lost 3 of their last 5 games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
EtarRilski Sportist
22Shots18
EtarRilski Sportist
7Shots on target7
EtarRilski Sportist
2.67xG2.23
EtarRilski Sportist
6Corners5
EtarRilski Sportist
110Dangerous attacks84
EtarRilski Sportist
15Fouls15
EtarRilski Sportist
0Cards0
EtarRilski Sportist

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.67Goals scored / match0.67
EtarRilski Sportist
0.67Goals conceded / match1.33
EtarRilski Sportist
65%Average possession59%
EtarRilski Sportist
5.33Shots on target / match4.33
EtarRilski Sportist

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.67Shots per match14.67
EtarRilski Sportist
5.33Shots on target4.33
EtarRilski Sportist
19.5%Shot conversion4.5%
EtarRilski Sportist
65%Possession59%
EtarRilski Sportist
2.03xG for1.76
EtarRilski Sportist
1.12xG against1.28
EtarRilski Sportist

Shooting quality

Etar: Efficient finishingRilski Sportist: Dominant
EtarRilski Sportist
Accuracy (shots on target)39%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.15

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Etar is 809% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Etar · 0.33 pts / match - Rilski Sportist

Etar
WWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Rilski Sportist
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Etar is 299% better for: goals scored per match.

2.67 goals / match - Etar · 0.67 goals / match - Rilski Sportist

Etar is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Etar · 1.33 goals / match - Rilski Sportist

Etar scoring profile: very strong

Etar scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Rilski Sportist keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Rilski Sportist scoring profile: mixed

Rilski Sportist scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Etar keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

8Goals scored (season)2
EtarRilski Sportist
2Goals conceded (season)4
EtarRilski Sportist
3.33Average goals in match2
EtarRilski Sportist
8Goals scored (last 5)2
EtarRilski Sportist
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
EtarRilski Sportist

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal33%
EtarRilski Sportist
67%2 goals33%
EtarRilski Sportist
33%3 goals0%
EtarRilski Sportist
33%4 goals0%
EtarRilski Sportist

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%2 goals33%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%3 goals0%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%4 goals0%
EtarRilski Sportist

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%BTTS in both halves33%
EtarRilski Sportist
33%Scored in both halves33%
EtarRilski Sportist

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
EtarRilski Sportist
67%BTTS - last 533%
EtarRilski Sportist

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
EtarRilski Sportist
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
EtarRilski Sportist
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
EtarRilski Sportist

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
EtarRilski Sportist
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
EtarRilski Sportist

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Etar is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Etar · 0.67 pts / match - Rilski Sportist

Etar - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Rilski Sportist - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)0.67
EtarRilski Sportist
1Goals scored (1st half)0.33
EtarRilski Sportist
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
EtarRilski Sportist
1.67Average goals (1st half)1
EtarRilski Sportist
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
EtarRilski Sportist
67%No goal before half-time67%
EtarRilski Sportist

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0.67
EtarRilski Sportist
1.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
EtarRilski Sportist
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
EtarRilski Sportist
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1
EtarRilski Sportist
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
EtarRilski Sportist
0%No goal after half-time67%
EtarRilski Sportist

Etar - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding303%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rilski Sportist - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Etar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.333.00
Goals scored / match1.01.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.0
Average goals in match1.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%100%
No goal67%0%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3
Rilski Sportist - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.670.67
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal67%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Etar
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Rilski Sportist
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Etar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.91
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
173%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Rilski Sportist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

EtarLigaRilski Sportist
Average goals in match▲ 3.332.79▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 67%54%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%46%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 33%25%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%61%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%75%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Anastas Pemperski⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Iliya Dimitrov⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EtarGoalAnastas Pemperski
  2. Rilski SportistGoalIliya Dimitrov

FAQ

What was the result of Etar vs Rilski Sportist?

The Second League match finished Etar 1:1 Rilski Sportist. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Etar vs Rilski Sportist?

Etar score 2.67 goals per game on average and Rilski Sportist 0.67. The Second League average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Etar's matches and 33% of Rilski Sportist's.

What form are Etar and Rilski Sportist in?

Over the last 5 games Etar have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Rilski Sportist 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Etar vs Rilski Sportist?

The statistical background for Etar vs Rilski Sportist — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.