Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema: match statistics
Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ethiopia Nigd Bank played Mekelle Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mekelle Kenema: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ethiopia Nigd Bank scores 1.28 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Mekelle Kenema scores 0.76 and concedes 0.96. League average: 1.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 68%, Mekelle Kenema 44%. Over 2.5: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 48%, Mekelle Kenema 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Ethiopia Nigd Bank has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.16. Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 6.4 shots per match, Mekelle Kenema: 6.3.
Match halves
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.80. Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.32.
Goals by minute
Ethiopia Nigd Bank: 76-90+ (10 goals). Mekelle Kenema: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.77 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ethiopia Nigd Bank holds a clear offensive edge: 32 goals this season versus Mekelle Kenema’s 19, and 7 goals in the last 5 matches compared to only 1 for the visitors. At home the hosts average 1.5 goals with 3.09 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, while Mekelle away manage just 0.5 goals, 2.42 shots on target and an 8% conversion, indicating higher quality attacking chances for the hosts. The visitors’ defense is, however, compact on the road — Mekelle concede only 0.67 goals on average, keep 50% clean sheets and have 67% of away matches without scoring, whereas the hosts concede 1.25 goals and have 25% clean sheets. The last 5 matches also favor the hosts (1.4 points per game vs 0.4 for the visitors) and although xG is similar (1.28 vs 1.09), the hosts’ superior finishing suggests they are more likely to convert created chances. Based on this, I back a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Main argument for 'No' – Mekelle Kenema averages only 0.5 goals scored per season and have totaled 1 goal in the last 5 matches (0.2 per match), with a season BTTS rate of just 17%. Additionally, Mekelle have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season and have a low shot conversion rate of 8%, meaning that even with a moderate xG of 1.09 they rarely convert chances into goals. Ethiopia Nigd Bank generates more (xG 1.22, 3.31 shots on target per match) and averages 1.0 goal this season (1.4 in the last 5), so they are the primary candidate to score, but that does not guarantee an away goal. Comparing seasonal BTTS 69% (home) vs 17% (away) and last 5 matches 60% vs 20% shows a large asymmetry – usually only the home side scores. For these reasons I assess the probability of BTTS 'No' at around 70% versus 30% for 'Yes', mainly due to Mekelle's low conversion rate and 50% clean sheets.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect around 2.31 total goals (expected_goals_home 1.22, expected_goals_away 1.09), since the home xG is 1.22 versus the away defense xG 1.10, and the away xG is 1.09 versus the home defense xG 1.33. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 7 goals (avg 1.4 per game) and conceded 7 (1.4), while the away side scored 1 goal (0.2 per game) and conceded 4 (0.8), indicating notably stronger offensive activity from the home team. Seasonal metrics show Over 1.5 in 69% of home matches and only 25% for the away side, which combined with total xG ~2.31 provides a strong signal for Over 1.5; therefore I recommend the over at the 1.5 line. The 2.5 line is more balanced — homes had Over 2.5 in 46% of the season and 60% in the last 5, guests 17% seasonally and 20% in the last 5 — hence a moderate probability for Over 2.5 (~52%). Over 3.5 looks unlikely (seasonally 23% for homes and 8% for guests), so I take a conservative view on that line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X) — I assign it a 35% probability. The home side were level at the break in 54% of matches, and the overall draw percentages at full-time are 54% for homes and 42% for aways, indicating a tendency toward draws. At half-time the hosts average 0.54 goals versus 0.33 for the visitors, and in the last five fixtures the hosts scored 0.6 goals by the break while the visitors scored 0.0, suggesting a low goal count in the first half; additionally the visitors keep a clean sheet at half-time in 75% of matches. Although the hosts have higher xG (1.22 vs 1.09) and more shots on target (3.31 vs 2.42), the hosts’ conversion rate of 15% versus the visitors’ 8% does not guarantee a breakthrough, so I assign moderate weight to X/1 scenarios (18%) and 2/2 (14%) as alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ethiopia Nigd Bank | Mekelle Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ethiopia Nigd Bank is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 0.4 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ethiopia Nigd Bank is 68% better for: goals scored per match.
1.28 goals / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 0.76 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema
Mekelle Kenema is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 0.96 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema
Ethiopia Nigd Bank scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
Mekelle Kenema scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Ethiopia Nigd Bank keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ethiopia Nigd Bank
Over / Under - Mekelle Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mekelle Kenema is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - Ethiopia Nigd Bank · 1.2 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ethiopia Nigd Bank - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mekelle Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ethiopia Nigd Bank
Mekelle Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ethiopia Nigd Bank | Liga | Mekelle Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.56 | 1.77 | • 1.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 41% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 27% | ▲ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 40% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 54% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 72% | 58% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ethiopia Nigd Bank 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelle Kenema. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Ethiopia Nigd Bank 3:0 Mekelle Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema?
Ethiopia Nigd Bank score 1.28 goals per game on average and Mekelle Kenema 0.76. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Ethiopia Nigd Bank's matches and 44% of Mekelle Kenema's.
What form are Ethiopia Nigd Bank and Mekelle Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Ethiopia Nigd Bank have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mekelle Kenema 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema?
The statistical background for Ethiopia Nigd Bank vs Mekelle Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


