Hungary - NB IETO ParkData current as of 30 August 2026

ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE: match statistics

ETO crest
ETO
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Zalaegerszegi TE crest
Zalaegerszegi TE

ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ETO played Zalaegerszegi TE in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: ETO Park. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

ETO: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match. Zalaegerszegi TE: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

ETO scores 2.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.25 and concedes 2.75. League average: 3.38 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ETO 67%, Zalaegerszegi TE 25%. Over 2.5: ETO 67%, Zalaegerszegi TE 75%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

ETO has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.13. ETO: 9.7 shots per match, Zalaegerszegi TE: 8.5.

Match halves

ETO: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.67. Zalaegerszegi TE: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

ETO: 76-90+ (3 goals). Zalaegerszegi TE: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.38 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ETO sit 5th, while Zalaegerszegi TE are only 11th, and the gap is also reflected in their recent form: the hosts have picked up 6 points from five matches, compared with just 3 for the visitors. ETO have won 100% of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 4 goals and conceding none, whereas Zalaegerszegi have lost both away games, conceding 4 goals per match. The visitors have failed to score in any away fixture, average just 2 shots on target, and create chances worth 0.86 xG, compared with 1.33 xG for the hosts. Although ETO average only 36% possession, their 5 shots on target per match and highly efficient finishing should be enough against a defence that allows an average of 1.83 xG. Zalaegerszegi’s away goal difference stands at -8, making a convincing home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is Zalaegerszegi TE’s very poor scoring efficiency: the team has failed to score in the available away data, with average xG of just 0.86. The visitors also failed to score in 100% of those matches, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of their last five games. ETO have recorded 0% clean sheets, but they conceded an average of just 0.8 goals in their last five appearances, while Zalaegerszegi TE scored an average of 1.0 goal. The hosts create significantly more danger, averaging 7.0 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 2.0, while the visitors have conceded 2.8 goals per match in their last five league fixtures. The most likely scenario is therefore one in which ETO score, but Zalaegerszegi TE once again fail to convert their limited chances—supporting BTTS - No / No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

ETO has clear scoring potential, averaging 1.44 xG, while Zalaegerszeg allows opponents 1.83 xG and has conceded an average of 2.8 goals in its last 5 matches. The hosts record an average of 7 shots on target per game compared with just 2 for the visitors, reinforcing the scenario of ETO having the upper hand. Both teams have so far had 100% of their matches finish with at least 2 goals, while the Hungarian league boasts a high average of 3.68 goals per game. Caution around the 2.5 line is warranted because ETO has gone over 2.5 goals in only 20% of its last 5 matches, although Zalaegerszeg’s corresponding figure stands at 80%. The strongest selection therefore remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 2.63 goals provides a solid margin above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

ETO have a clear quality advantage: their average xG stands at 1.44 compared with Zalaegerszeg’s 0.86, while the hosts average 7 shots on target per match against just 2 for the visitors. Based on the available data, ETO have won 100% of their matches and were leading at the break in their only home game, whereas Zalaegerszeg have lost all of their away matches and were behind at half-time in 100% of them. The defensive form is equally compelling: over their last five matches, ETO conceded an average of 0.8 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 2.8. Zalaegerszeg have failed to score in any of their away matches to date, while they have conceded an average of 2.5 goals after half-time. The most likely scenario is therefore that ETO take the lead before the break and maintain it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
8Shots15
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
6Shots on target6
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1.22xG1.76
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
2Corners7
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
40Dangerous attacks55
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
13Fouls10
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3Cards4
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ETOZalaegerszegi TE
2.33Goals scored / match1.25
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1Goals conceded / match2.75
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
51%Average possession46%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3.67Shots on target / match4
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match8.5
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3.67Shots on target4
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
24.1%Shot conversion14.7%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
51%Possession46%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1.22xG for1.13
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1.79xG against1.61
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

Shooting quality

ETO: Efficient finishingZalaegerszegi TE: Counter-attacking
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
Accuracy (shots on target)38%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ETO is 123% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / match - ETO · 0.75 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

ETO
DWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Zalaegerszegi TE
LWLL
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ETO is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

2.33 goals / match - ETO · 1.25 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

ETO is 175% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - ETO · 2.75 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Zalaegerszegi TE scoring profile: more difficult

Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

7Goals scored (season)5
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3Goals conceded (season)11
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3.33Average goals in match4
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
7Goals scored (last 5)5
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
3Goals conceded (last 5)11
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
67%2 goals25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%3 goals25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%4 goals25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%2 goals75%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0%3 goals50%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0%4 goals25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%Scored in both halves25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
67%BTTS - last 525%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
67%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ETO is 211% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / match - ETO · 0.75 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE

ETO - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
Zalaegerszegi TE - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per match (1st half)0.75
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.75
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0Goals conceded (1st half)1.5
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
0.67Average goals (1st half)2.25
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%No goal before half-time75%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
2.67Average goals (2nd half)1.75
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE
33%No goal after half-time75%
ETOZalaegerszegi TE

ETO - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding49%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ETO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.331.33
Goals scored / match0.71.7
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.72.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%67%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Zalaegerszegi TE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.00
Goals scored / match0.80.5
Goals conceded / match1.51.3
Average goals in match2.31.8
1 goal100%75%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Zalaegerszegi TE
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Zalaegerszegi TE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

ETOLigaZalaegerszegi TE
Average goals in match 3.333.38 4.00
Both teams scored 67%62% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 75%
Clean sheets 33%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.38
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ETOYellow cardViktor Đukanović
  2. ETOYellow cardNorbert Urblík
  3. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardQueyrell Tchicamboud
  4. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardJoseth Peraza
  5. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Lucas AlfonsoOff: Bence Babos
  6. ETOSubstitutionOn: Peter AgbaOff: Márton Szép
  7. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardJosé Manuel Calderón Portillo
  8. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardJude Madaki
  9. ETOYellow cardMiljan Krpić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): ETO 0 - 1 - 2 Zalaegerszegi TE. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

The NB I match finished ETO 3:0 Zalaegerszegi TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ETO and Zalaegerszegi TE?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches ETO won 0, Zalaegerszegi TE won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

ETO score 2.33 goals per game on average and Zalaegerszegi TE 1.25. The NB I average is 3.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of ETO's matches and 25% of Zalaegerszegi TE's.

What form are ETO and Zalaegerszegi TE in?

Over the last 5 games ETO have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Zalaegerszegi TE 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ETO vs Zalaegerszegi TE?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.