England - EFL League OneData current as of 12 September 2026

Exeter City vs Wycombe Wanderers: match statistics

155%(2.87)
X30%(3.30)
215%(2.33)

Exeter City presents significantly better home form with 50% of matches won at home and an impressive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals in home matches with 50% clean sheets, which testifies to a solid defense. Wycombe Wanderers has weak away statistics—just 13% wins on the road, a negative goal difference of -7, and an average of 1.27 goals conceded per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 33% of away matches, while Exeter has only 29% of such meetings at home. Possession is even (55% vs 56%), but Exeter's efficiency in home matches (11% shot conversion) combined with a higher average of shots on target (4.36 vs 3.33) gives the hosts a clear advantage. The recent form of both teams is average, but Exeter's home ground advantage should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

Exeter City vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Exeter City played Wycombe Wanderers in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 17 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Exeter City: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Wycombe Wanderers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Exeter City scores 1.10 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.35 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Exeter City 33%, Wycombe Wanderers 52%. Over 2.5: Exeter City 40%, Wycombe Wanderers 45%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Wycombe Wanderers has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.21. Exeter City: 10.3 shots per match, Wycombe Wanderers: 13.0.

Match halves

Exeter City: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.67. Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Exeter City: 76-90+ (8 goals). Wycombe Wanderers: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Exeter City presents significantly better home form with 50% of matches won at home and an impressive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.43 goals in home matches with 50% clean sheets, which testifies to a solid defense. Wycombe Wanderers has weak away statistics—just 13% wins on the road, a negative goal difference of -7, and an average of 1.27 goals conceded per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 33% of away matches, while Exeter has only 29% of such meetings at home. Possession is even (55% vs 56%), but Exeter's efficiency in home matches (11% shot conversion) combined with a higher average of shots on target (4.36 vs 3.33) gives the hosts a clear advantage. The recent form of both teams is average, but Exeter's home ground advantage should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
20Shots7
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
5Shots on target3
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1.99xG0.92
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
8Corners4
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
53Dangerous attacks35
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
8Fouls13
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
0Cards2
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1.1Goals scored / match1.35
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1Goals conceded / match1.1
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
52%Average possession54%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3.47Shots on target / match4.48
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.33Shots per match13.03
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3.47Shots on target4.48
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
10.6%Shot conversion10.4%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
52%Possession54%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1.21xG for1.5
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1.32xG against1.2
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Shooting quality

Exeter City: BalancedWycombe Wanderers: Balanced
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wycombe Wanderers is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Exeter City · 1.4 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers

Exeter City
WDLDD
Season result split
37% W20% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-13
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Wycombe Wanderers
LWDWL
Season result split
35% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-10
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wycombe Wanderers is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Exeter City · 1.35 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers

Exeter City is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Exeter City · 1.1 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers

Exeter City scoring profile: strong

Exeter City scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 matches).

Wycombe Wanderers scoring profile: strong

Wycombe Wanderers scores in 74% of matches (23 of 31 matches), while Exeter City keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

33Goals scored (season)42
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
30Goals conceded (season)34
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
2.1Average goals in match2.45
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal74%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
27%2 goals42%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
17%3 goals13%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3%4 goals6%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal68%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
30%2 goals32%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3%3 goals6%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3%4 goals3%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Wycombe Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 31 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time16%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
23%Scored in both halves32%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
40%BTTS - last 520%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wycombe Wanderers is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Exeter City · 1.42 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers

Exeter City - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing
Wycombe Wanderers - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.42
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1Average goals (1st half)1.29
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
53%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
60%No goal before half-time52%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.74
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.16
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
70%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers
53%No goal after half-time42%
Exeter CityWycombe Wanderers

Exeter City - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
36
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results

48% W29% D23% L
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Exeter City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Wycombe Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Exeter City
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
8
16-30
4
5
31-45
7
1
46-60
5
6
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Wycombe Wanderers
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
10
31-45
6
3
46-60
11
6
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Exeter City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Wycombe Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Exeter CityLigaWycombe Wanderers
Average goals in match 2.102.59 2.45
Both teams scored 33%51% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%50% 45%
Clean sheets 37%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 70%68% 81%
Goal after half-time 67%81% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wycombe WanderersGoalFred OnyedinmaAssist: Ewan Henderson
  2. Wycombe WanderersYellow cardEwan Henderson
  3. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Luke LeahyOff: Ewan Henderson
  4. Exeter CitySubstitutionOn: Akeel HigginsOff: Ryan Rydel
  5. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: André Filipe Cunha VidigalOff: Armando Quitirna
  6. Wycombe WanderersYellow cardLuke Harris
  7. Exeter CitySubstitutionOn: Timur TuterovOff: Josh Magennis
  8. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Taylor Ellis AllenOff: Cauley Woodrow
  9. Exeter CitySubstitutionOn: Sonny CoxOff: Jake Billy Doyle-Hayes
  10. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Bradley FinkOff: Luke Harris
  11. Exeter CityGoalJayden WarehamAssist: Akeel Higgins

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Exeter City 1 - 0 - 0 Wycombe Wanderers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Wycombe Wanderers FC
0 : 1
Exeter City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Exeter City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

The EFL League One match finished Exeter City 1:1 Wycombe Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Exeter City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

Exeter City score 1.10 goals per game on average and Wycombe Wanderers 1.35. The EFL League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Exeter City's matches and 52% of Wycombe Wanderers's.

What form are Exeter City and Wycombe Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Exeter City have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Wycombe Wanderers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Exeter City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.