FA Šiauliai vs Banga: match statistics
FA Šiauliai vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FA Šiauliai play Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
FA Šiauliai: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Banga: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FA Šiauliai scores 0.95 and concedes 1.91 goals per match. Banga scores 1.41 and concedes 0.68. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FA Šiauliai 55%, Banga 32%. Over 2.5: FA Šiauliai 55%, Banga 36%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Banga has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.35. FA Šiauliai: 11.1 shots per match, Banga: 11.9.
Match halves
FA Šiauliai: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.64. Banga: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
FA Šiauliai: 76-90+ (6 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 60%.
Match description
FA Šiauliai at home are unable to score — on average 0 goals per match and 100% of home games without a goal, while conceding as many as 3.5 goals per game. Banga’s defense on the road is markedly better — only 0.67 conceded goals per away match and 33% clean sheets, with an average of 0.67 goals scored away. The difference in chance quality also favors the visitors: hosts average 5.5 shots per match with 1.0 on target, while Banga average 11.67 shots with 3.67 on target; xG is 0.91 for Šiauliai versus 1.32 for Banga. Although Šiauliai have better recent results overall (1.4 points per match in the last 5 and form 'lldww'), their home record is -7 with no goals scored, which severely limits their prospects of holding a favorable result. On this basis I favor the away win — I predict a Banga victory, with estimated probabilities: home 15%, draw 20%, away 65%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FA Šiauliai | Banga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banga is 48% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - FA Šiauliai · 1.41 goals / match - Banga
Banga is 181% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.91 goals / match - FA Šiauliai · 0.68 goals / match - Banga
FA Šiauliai scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).
Banga scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while FA Šiauliai keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — FA Šiauliai
Over / Under — Banga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Banga is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.68 pts / match - FA Šiauliai · 1.32 pts / match - Banga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FA Šiauliai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Banga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FA Šiauliai
Banga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| FA Šiauliai | Liga | Banga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 49% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 55% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 32% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 69% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): FA Šiauliai 2 - 1 - 2 Banga. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
The A Lyga match finished FA Šiauliai 0:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FA Šiauliai and Banga?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches FA Šiauliai won 2, Banga won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
FA Šiauliai score 0.95 goals per game on average and Banga 1.41. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FA Šiauliai's matches and 32% of Banga's.
What form are FA Šiauliai and Banga in?
Over the last 5 games FA Šiauliai have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Banga 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FA Šiauliai vs Banga?
The statistical background for FA Šiauliai vs Banga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.