FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen: match statistics
FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FA Šiauliai played Hegelmann Litauen in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Šiaulių m. savivaldybes stadionas. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
FA Šiauliai: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Hegelmann Litauen: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FA Šiauliai scores 0.93 and concedes 1.97 goals per match. Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.07 and concedes 1.68. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FA Šiauliai 52%, Hegelmann Litauen 68%. Over 2.5: FA Šiauliai 55%, Hegelmann Litauen 46%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
FA Šiauliai has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.13. FA Šiauliai: 11.0 shots per match, Hegelmann Litauen: 9.2.
Match halves
FA Šiauliai: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.59. Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
FA Šiauliai: 46-60 (6 goals). Hegelmann Litauen: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-5. Average goals 2.57, BTTS 43%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FA Šiauliai have a clearly better home record, winning 29% of their matches, while Hegelmann Litauen win just 15% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 10.5 shots and 3.5 shots on target per match, compared with 8.08 shots and 2.15 on target for the visitors. Šiauliai’s edge in chance quality is moderate but tangible: their average home xG stands at 1.31, while Hegelmann generate 0.98 xG away from home. Both defences are prone to mistakes, with the hosts conceding an average of 2.14 goals and the visitors 2.00. However, Šiauliai’s current run is the weaker of the two, with just 1 win in their last 5 matches, while Hegelmann have failed to win any. Hegelmann’s high 31% share of away draws increases the risk of a points split, but home advantage and greater attacking activity provide a slight edge to the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No pick is slightly stronger, primarily due to FA Šiauliai’s very poor current scoring form: the hosts have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game. During the same period, BTTS landed in only 20% of Šiauliai’s matches, despite their season-long rate standing at as high as 80%, which points to a clear decline in attacking form. Hegelmann regularly allows opponents to create chances, conceding an average of 2.0 goals, but they score just 0.92 goals per match on average and fail to find the net in as many as 38% of their season fixtures. The hosts have recorded a low 1.17 xG across their last five appearances, while the visitors average 1.02 xG, creating a genuine risk that one side will fail to convert its chances. The season-long defensive data for both teams and Šiauliai’s 80% BTTS rate increase the chances of the BTTS - Yes outcome, but the hosts’ current attacking struggles shift the forecast toward a scenario in which at least one team remains scoreless.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The 2.51-goal projection is based on moderate xG figures: 1.25 for Šiauliai and 0.98 for Hegelmann, alongside elevated xG conceded figures of 1.54 and 1.48, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.20 goals, but have found the net only 2 times in their last five matches, averaging just 0.4 goals per game. Hegelmann concede an average of 2.00 goals, yet as many as 69% of their matches finished with no more than three goals; the same trend is supported by 67% of Šiauliai's matches. Over 2.5 goals landed in 40% of the hosts' matches and 54% of the visitors' matches, indicating a realistic chance of three goals, but not of regular four-goal games. The strongest option is Under 3.5, as both teams have stayed below this line in approximately two-thirds of their matches, while Šiauliai's poor recent finishing further limits the goal ceiling.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Šiauliai have a clearly stronger first-half profile: they were leading at the break in 27% of matches, compared with 15% for Hegelmann, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in as many as 54% of games. The hosts average 0.60 goals scored and 0.53 conceded before the break, whereas Hegelmann score just 0.31 goals and allow opponents 1.15. The recent run further reinforces this signal, as the visitors have failed to score before half-time in any of their last five matches and went into the interval trailing in all five. After the restart, Šiauliai may maintain their advantage, as they create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.25 compared with 0.98, while shots on target amount to 3.73 versus 2.15. The scenario of the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match is therefore the strongest HT/FT angle, although Šiauliai’s high 60% draw rate this season leaves a significant risk of a turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FA Šiauliai | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FA Šiauliai is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - FA Šiauliai · 0.4 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hegelmann Litauen is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - FA Šiauliai · 1.07 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen
Hegelmann Litauen is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.97 goals / match - FA Šiauliai · 1.68 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen
FA Šiauliai scores in 59% of matches (17 of 29 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).
Hegelmann Litauen scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while FA Šiauliai keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FA Šiauliai
Over / Under - Hegelmann Litauen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hegelmann Litauen is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.66 pts / match - FA Šiauliai · 1.07 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FA Šiauliai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FA Šiauliai
Hegelmann Litauen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| FA Šiauliai | Liga | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.90 | 2.67 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 48% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (7): FA Šiauliai 0 - 2 - 5 Hegelmann Litauen. Average goals 2.57, both teams scored in 43% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen?
The A Lyga match finished FA Šiauliai 0:0 Hegelmann Litauen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FA Šiauliai and Hegelmann Litauen?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches FA Šiauliai won 0, Hegelmann Litauen won 5 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.57 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen?
FA Šiauliai score 0.93 goals per game on average and Hegelmann Litauen 1.07. The A Lyga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FA Šiauliai's matches and 68% of Hegelmann Litauen's.
What form are FA Šiauliai and Hegelmann Litauen in?
Over the last 5 games FA Šiauliai have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Hegelmann Litauen 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FA Šiauliai vs Hegelmann Litauen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


