Fafe vs CD Trofense: match statistics
Fafe vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fafe played CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 14 December 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Fafe: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CD Trofense: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fafe scores 1.08 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 1.25 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fafe 50%, CD Trofense 58%. Over 2.5: Fafe 25%, CD Trofense 33%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Fafe has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.29. Fafe: 11.5 shots per match, CD Trofense: 8.7.
Match halves
Fafe: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. CD Trofense: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Fafe: 46-60 (4 goals). CD Trofense: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 3: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fafe | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fafe is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Fafe · 0.8 pts / match - CD Trofense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Trofense is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Fafe · 1.25 goals / match - CD Trofense
CD Trofense is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Fafe · 0.75 goals / match - CD Trofense
Fafe scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
CD Trofense scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fafe
Over / Under - CD Trofense
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Trofense is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Fafe · 1.25 pts / match - CD Trofense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fafe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fafe
CD Trofense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| Fafe | Liga | CD Trofense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.17 | 2.03 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 72% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fafe 0 - 0 - 1 CD Trofense. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fafe vs CD Trofense?
The Liga 3 match finished Fafe 1:2 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fafe vs CD Trofense?
Fafe score 1.08 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 1.25. The Liga 3 average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Fafe's matches and 58% of CD Trofense's.
What form are Fafe and CD Trofense in?
Over the last 5 games Fafe have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fafe vs CD Trofense?
The statistical background for Fafe vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.