FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics
FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAR Rabat played CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
FAR Rabat: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAR Rabat scores 1.55 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 1.00 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAR Rabat 52%, CR Khemis Zemamra 55%. Over 2.5: FAR Rabat 48%, CR Khemis Zemamra 45%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.32. FAR Rabat: 12.1 shots per match, CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.8.
Match halves
FAR Rabat: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.93. CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
FAR Rabat: 46-60 (10 goals). CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAR Rabat is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table with 13 wins and 45 goals this season, while CR Khemis are 11th with 9 wins and 29 goals. At home FAR average 1.71 goals per match with an average xG of 1.53 and concede only 0.64 goals, keep clean sheets in 50% of home games and have 0% home defeats; visitors on the road score 1.07 goals, have xG 1.36 and concede 1.57 goals with only 7% clean sheets. FAR convert chances better (on average 4.21 shots on target and 15% conversion at home vs 4.0 shots on target and 9% conversion for the away side) and have a much lower share of goalless matches (14% vs 36%). In the last 5 fixtures the home side have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 defeat (9-8 goals, 1.2 pts/match), while the visitors have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 defeats (6-8, 0.6 pts/match). Considering the defensive edge (0.64 vs 1.57), superior finishing efficiency (15% vs 9%) and FAR’s unbeaten home record, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS comes from both teams' form: in the last 5 matches FAR Rabat and CR Khemis Zemamra have each recorded 80% of games with both teams scoring. Season-long BTTS rates are 53% for FAR and 57% for CR versus the league level of 52%, indicating these teams’ matches finish with goals from both sides more often than average. Visitors have only 7% clean sheets while hosts have 40%, yet in the last 5 fixtures FAR averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, and CR averaged 1.2 scored and 1.6 conceded — both sides are offensive and prone to conceding. This is supported by last-5 xG: FAR 1.36 and CR 1.59 with xG against of ~1.0 and 0.96, suggesting real chances at both ends; combined with 4.0 SOT for the away side and 3.13 for the home side this points to an advantage in attacking situations. Given the 80% BTTS form and the very low away clean sheet rate of 7%, I recommend BTTS - Yes, estimating probability at 75% for "yes" and 25% for "no".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-form based model indicates a moderately high goal potential: home xG 1.28 vs away xG 1.36, yielding expected goals ~1.30 for FAR Rabat and ~1.30 for CR Khemis Zemamra (total 2.60). The Poisson distribution for λ=2.60 gives probability of ≥2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈73%, ≥3 goals (Over 2.5) ≈48% and ≥4 goals (Over 3.5) ≈26%, consistent with seasonal rates (Over 1.5: home 53% vs away 79%, average 66%; Over 2.5: 33% vs 57%, average 45%). Additionally, hosts concede on average 0.93 goals and keep 40% clean sheets, while guests score 1.07 and concede 1.57 with only 7% clean sheets for away sides, which increases goal likelihood. In the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 1.8 goals and the guests 1.2, and both teams have 80% BTTS rates in their last 5 outings; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: FAR Rabat were level at the break in 73% of matches, with the home side leading at the interval in only 7% of games and CR Khemis Zemamra leading in 21% — therefore HT = draw is the most likely. The first half should also be balanced in terms of chance quality: xG is 1.28 for the hosts versus 1.36 for the visitors, and average shots on target are 3.13 vs 4.00, so I do not expect clear dominance before the break. After the interval FAR Rabat show better recent figures — in the last 5 matches the hosts scored on average 1.0 second-half goals versus 0.6 for the visitors, and average points in the last 5 are 1.2 for the hosts compared to 0.6 for the guests — this supports a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the hosts have 60% clean sheets at the break versus 36% for the opponents, which together with better post-break form suggests the half-time draw may convert into a FAR Rabat victory. Therefore my strongest pick is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAR Rabat | CR Khemis Zemamra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAR Rabat is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 0.6 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
1.55 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra
FAR Rabat is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.24 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra
FAR Rabat scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAR Rabat
Over / Under - CR Khemis Zemamra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAR Rabat is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAR Rabat
CR Khemis Zemamra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FAR Rabat | Liga | CR Khemis Zemamra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.31 | 2.17 | • 2.24 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 52% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 38% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 30% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 62% | ▲ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | • 72% | 73% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FAR Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?
The Botola Pro match finished FAR Rabat 0:0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?
FAR Rabat score 1.55 goals per game on average and CR Khemis Zemamra 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FAR Rabat's matches and 55% of CR Khemis Zemamra's.
What form are FAR Rabat and CR Khemis Zemamra in?
Over the last 5 games FAR Rabat have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and CR Khemis Zemamra 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


