Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 07 September 2026

FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics

FAR Rabat crest
FAR Rabat
0 : 0half-time 0:0
CR Khemis Zemamra crest
CR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAR Rabat played CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

FAR Rabat: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAR Rabat scores 1.55 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 1.00 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAR Rabat 52%, CR Khemis Zemamra 55%. Over 2.5: FAR Rabat 48%, CR Khemis Zemamra 45%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.32. FAR Rabat: 12.1 shots per match, CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.8.

Match halves

FAR Rabat: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.93. CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

FAR Rabat: 46-60 (10 goals). CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAR Rabat is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table with 13 wins and 45 goals this season, while CR Khemis are 11th with 9 wins and 29 goals. At home FAR average 1.71 goals per match with an average xG of 1.53 and concede only 0.64 goals, keep clean sheets in 50% of home games and have 0% home defeats; visitors on the road score 1.07 goals, have xG 1.36 and concede 1.57 goals with only 7% clean sheets. FAR convert chances better (on average 4.21 shots on target and 15% conversion at home vs 4.0 shots on target and 9% conversion for the away side) and have a much lower share of goalless matches (14% vs 36%). In the last 5 fixtures the home side have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 defeat (9-8 goals, 1.2 pts/match), while the visitors have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 defeats (6-8, 0.6 pts/match). Considering the defensive edge (0.64 vs 1.57), superior finishing efficiency (15% vs 9%) and FAR’s unbeaten home record, I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS comes from both teams' form: in the last 5 matches FAR Rabat and CR Khemis Zemamra have each recorded 80% of games with both teams scoring. Season-long BTTS rates are 53% for FAR and 57% for CR versus the league level of 52%, indicating these teams’ matches finish with goals from both sides more often than average. Visitors have only 7% clean sheets while hosts have 40%, yet in the last 5 fixtures FAR averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, and CR averaged 1.2 scored and 1.6 conceded — both sides are offensive and prone to conceding. This is supported by last-5 xG: FAR 1.36 and CR 1.59 with xG against of ~1.0 and 0.96, suggesting real chances at both ends; combined with 4.0 SOT for the away side and 3.13 for the home side this points to an advantage in attacking situations. Given the 80% BTTS form and the very low away clean sheet rate of 7%, I recommend BTTS - Yes, estimating probability at 75% for "yes" and 25% for "no".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-and-form based model indicates a moderately high goal potential: home xG 1.28 vs away xG 1.36, yielding expected goals ~1.30 for FAR Rabat and ~1.30 for CR Khemis Zemamra (total 2.60). The Poisson distribution for λ=2.60 gives probability of ≥2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈73%, ≥3 goals (Over 2.5) ≈48% and ≥4 goals (Over 3.5) ≈26%, consistent with seasonal rates (Over 1.5: home 53% vs away 79%, average 66%; Over 2.5: 33% vs 57%, average 45%). Additionally, hosts concede on average 0.93 goals and keep 40% clean sheets, while guests score 1.07 and concede 1.57 with only 7% clean sheets for away sides, which increases goal likelihood. In the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 1.8 goals and the guests 1.2, and both teams have 80% BTTS rates in their last 5 outings; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: FAR Rabat were level at the break in 73% of matches, with the home side leading at the interval in only 7% of games and CR Khemis Zemamra leading in 21% — therefore HT = draw is the most likely. The first half should also be balanced in terms of chance quality: xG is 1.28 for the hosts versus 1.36 for the visitors, and average shots on target are 3.13 vs 4.00, so I do not expect clear dominance before the break. After the interval FAR Rabat show better recent figures — in the last 5 matches the hosts scored on average 1.0 second-half goals versus 0.6 for the visitors, and average points in the last 5 are 1.2 for the hosts compared to 0.6 for the guests — this supports a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the hosts have 60% clean sheets at the break versus 36% for the opponents, which together with better post-break form suggests the half-time draw may convert into a FAR Rabat victory. Therefore my strongest pick is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
-1Shots-1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
-1Shots on target-1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0xG0
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
-1Corners-1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0Dangerous attacks0
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
-1Fouls-1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1Cards2
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1.55Goals scored / match1
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0.76Goals conceded / match1.24
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
57%Average possession49%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
4.34Shots on target / match3.55
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.1Shots per match10.79
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
4.34Shots on target3.55
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
12.8%Shot conversion9.3%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
57%Possession49%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1.62xG for1.32
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1xG against1.29
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

Shooting quality

FAR Rabat: BalancedCR Khemis Zemamra: Balanced
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAR Rabat is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 0.6 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat
DWDDL
Season result split
45% W52% R3% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-1
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
CR Khemis Zemamra
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W28% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-12
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAR Rabat is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.55 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.76 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.24 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat scoring profile: very strong

FAR Rabat scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: mixed

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

45Goals scored (season)29
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
22Goals conceded (season)36
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
2.31Average goals in match2.24
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
9Goals scored (last 5)6
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal66%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
55%2 goals28%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
21%3 goals7%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
3%4 goals0%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal76%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
21%2 goals31%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
3%3 goals14%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals3%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 29 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time14%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
7%BTTS in both halves3%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
45%Scored in both halves17%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
80%BTTS - last 580%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAR Rabat is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat - half-time state
28% leading62% draw10% trailing
CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
14% leading48% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)0.9
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.31
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1Average goals (1st half)0.9
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
72%Clean sheet before half-time48%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
48%No goal before half-time72%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.79Points per match (2nd half)1.34
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.34
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
69%Clean sheet after half-time48%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra
31%No goal after half-time45%
FAR RabatCR Khemis Zemamra

FAR Rabat - second-half results

45% W45% R10% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

31% W41% R28% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding221%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FAR Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAR Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
2
16-30
9
4
31-45
10
3
46-60
7
4
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
11
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAR Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

FAR RabatLigaCR Khemis Zemamra
Average goals in match 2.312.17 2.24
Both teams scored 52%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%38% 45%
Clean sheets 48%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 55%62% 66%
Goal after half-time 72%73% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.16
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardJames Ajako
  2. FAR RabatYellow cardNolan Mbemba
  3. FAR RabatSubstitutionOn: Khalid Ait OuarkhaneOff: Ahmed Hammoudan
  4. FAR RabatSubstitutionOn: Achraf MissouOff: Augusto Real Carneiro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FAR Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The Botola Pro match finished FAR Rabat 0:0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

FAR Rabat score 1.55 goals per game on average and CR Khemis Zemamra 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FAR Rabat's matches and 55% of CR Khemis Zemamra's.

What form are FAR Rabat and CR Khemis Zemamra in?

Over the last 5 games FAR Rabat have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and CR Khemis Zemamra 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAR Rabat vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.