FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi: match statistics
FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAR Rabat played Olympic Safi in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
FAR Rabat: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Olympic Safi: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAR Rabat scores 1.50 and concedes 0.44 goals per match. Olympic Safi scores 0.83 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAR Rabat 33%, Olympic Safi 67%. Over 2.5: FAR Rabat 44%, Olympic Safi 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.23. FAR Rabat: 11.8 shots per match, Olympic Safi: 9.8.
Match halves
FAR Rabat: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.00. Olympic Safi: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
FAR Rabat: 46-60 (7 goals). Olympic Safi: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAR Rabat is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table versus Olympic Safi's 16th. The hosts have scored 27 goals this season compared to the visitors' 15, and conceded only 8 goals versus 29 for their opponents. At home FAR averages 1.67 goals scored and only 0.44 conceded per match, with clean sheets in 67% of games, while Olympic have recorded zero clean sheets away and concede on average 1.67 goals per away match. The hosts create better chances — home xG for FAR is 1.52 versus 1.12 xG for Olympic on the road, more shots (11.56 vs 9.11) and more on-target efforts (4.56 vs 2.78) with a conversion rate of 14% vs 10%. In the last 5 matches FAR have scored 4 and conceded 4 (record 1-3-1, 1.2 points per game), while Olympic have scored 5 and conceded 9 (0 wins, 0.4 points per game), which further favors the hosts. Based on this I predict a home win and propose the probability distribution: 75% FAR Rabat, 15% draw, 10% Olympic Safi.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a season-long BTTS rate of 67% each, well above the league average of 49%, indicating a tendency for matches where both sides score. In the last 5 matches Olympic Safi has BTTS 100%, while FAR Rabat is at 40%, and Olympic have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in that period (9 conceded), significantly increasing the likelihood of a goal for the hosts. Season figures show FAR have scored 27 and conceded 8 (0.78 scored and 1.56 conceded per match), and Olympic 15 scored and 29 conceded (0.89 scored and 1.67 conceded), meaning both teams have the potential to score and to concede. xG supports this picture: FAR generate 1.34 xG on average versus Olympic's 1.12 xG, but xG against Olympic is 1.51 compared to 1.21 for FAR, and Olympic have 0% clean sheets seasonally versus 22% for FAR. Considering the 67% BTTS for both teams, Olympic's 100% BTTS in the last 5, Olympic's 29 goals conceded and lack of clean sheets, a BTTS - Yes pick appears the stronger and more probable signal (70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a strong probability for Over 1.5: FAR Rabat has a season over-1.5 rate of 78% and Olympic Safi 89%. An xG-based model gives expected goals of 1.43 for the home side (xG for 1.34 and xG against 1.51 -> average) and 1.17 for the away side (xG for 1.12 and xG against 1.21), totaling ~2.60 goals, which exceeds the league average of 2.13. Additionally, both teams have BTTS in 67% of matches; the home side averages 3.56 shots on target versus 2.78 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches Olympic Safi conceded 9 goals (1.8 per game) while FAR Rabat conceded 4 (0.8 per game), supporting a higher goal count. Season over-2.5 rates are 56% for the home team and 44% for the away team, whereas over-3.5 occurs in only 11%/22% of matches, so the signal for Over 2.5 is moderate and Over 3.5 has low probability. Consequently I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (line 1.5), supported by season rates 78% vs 89% and projected xG 1.43:1.17 (sum 2.60).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X) as the strongest signal because the home team are level at the break in 44% of matches and the overall full-time draw rate is 33%. Both teams score little in the first half – FAR Rabat average 0.22 goals by half-time, Olympic Safi 0.56 (6 home first‑half goals vs 10 away first‑half goals this season) – which favors a low, tied score after 45 minutes. Although the season figures show the home side lose 56% of matches (corresponding to 56% away wins), the last five rounds favor the hosts: FAR have 20% wins and 60% draws in the last five, while Olympic have 0% wins and 40% draws, indicating weak form for the visitors. Additionally, both teams have a season BTTS rate of 67%, so a drawn score with goals (for example 1–1) is realistic, strengthening X/X as the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAR Rabat | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAR Rabat is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 0.8 pts / match - Olympic Safi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 81% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 0.83 goals / match - Olympic Safi
FAR Rabat is 266% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.44 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.61 goals / match - Olympic Safi
FAR Rabat scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
Olympic Safi scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 67% (12 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAR Rabat
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAR Rabat is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 1.06 pts / match - Olympic Safi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAR Rabat
Olympic Safi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FAR Rabat | Liga | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.94 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 49% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 32% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FAR Rabat 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Safi. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi?
The Botola Pro match finished FAR Rabat 1:1 Olympic Safi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi?
FAR Rabat score 1.50 goals per game on average and Olympic Safi 0.83. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of FAR Rabat's matches and 67% of Olympic Safi's.
What form are FAR Rabat and Olympic Safi in?
Over the last 5 games FAR Rabat have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Olympic Safi 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi?
The statistical background for FAR Rabat vs Olympic Safi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.