FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca: match statistics
FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAR Rabat played Raja Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 30 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
FAR Rabat: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Raja Casablanca: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAR Rabat scores 1.56 and concedes 0.44 goals per match. Raja Casablanca scores 1.31 and concedes 0.31. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAR Rabat 31%, Raja Casablanca 25%. Over 2.5: FAR Rabat 44%, Raja Casablanca 13%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.42. FAR Rabat: 12.4 shots per match, Raja Casablanca: 11.0.
Match halves
FAR Rabat: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00. Raja Casablanca: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
FAR Rabat: 46-60 (6 goals). Raja Casablanca: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back 2 (Raja Casablanca to win): the visitors arrive in markedly better form — 4 wins in their last 5 matches, 10 goals scored and an average of 2.6 points per match in that period. FAR Rabat, however, are very solid at home: 0 defeats in home fixtures, 63% wins, 1.63 goals per game, only 0.38 conceded and 75% clean sheets. Still, the hosts’ recent results are weaker (just 1 win in the last 5 and 1.2 points per game), and xG helps to contextualize — FAR have home xG For 1.60 with xG Against 0.95, while Raja away have xG For 1.36 and xG Against 1.47. Raja also record higher possession (58% away) and average 10 shots with 4.29 on target, whereas FAR generate 12.25 shots and 4.75 on target at home; this shows the hosts create more chances, but the visitors are currently more efficient. Considering the visitors’ form advantage and better goal output over the last 5 matches, I assess probabilities as 40% for the visitors, 32% for a draw and 28% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics strongly favor No BTTS: FAR Rabat have only 22% of matches with both teams scoring and as many as 78% clean sheets, with an average goals conceded of 0.22 per game. Raja Casablanca average 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches (10 goals) and have 40% BTTS in those five games, but their season BTTS is only 29% with an average goals conceded of 0.43 per match. xG analysis shows a defensive advantage for the hosts — FAR concede 0.79 xG per game versus 1.47 xG conceded by Raja, with xG for being 1.47 and 1.36 respectively, suggesting the hosts limit the quality of opponent chances. Additionally FAR have scored 25 and conceded 7 this season, and the league records 65% of matches as clean sheets, so the competition context and the specific numbers favor a low likelihood of both teams scoring; therefore I assess No BTTS at 75% vs 25% for BTTS and tip “No” (No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate a total of about 2.50 goals: FAR Rabat ~1.30 goals, Raja Casablanca ~1.20 goals. This is based on xG and form — FAR has an average home xG of 1.47 but has scored 4 goals in the last 5 matches (0.8 per match), while Raja has xG_for 1.36 and scored 10 goals in the last 5 (2.0 per match), hence the adjustment to 1.30/1.20. Season-long figures support a low-scoring outcome: FAR concedes on average 0.22 goals at home and keeps clean sheets in 78% of matches, Raja concedes 0.43 goals away and has not recorded any match over 2.5 goals this season (0%). Additionally, both teams rarely finish matches with goals from both sides (22% for hosts, 29% for away teams), which reinforces the lower total signal. Under a Poisson model with λ≈2.50 the probabilities are P(over1.5)≈71%, P(over2.5)≈46%, P(over3.5)≈24%, therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Under 3.5 (≈76% probability).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonally FAR Rabat score an average of 1.56 goals at home and concede only 0.22 per match, with a 67% home win rate and 78% of home matches without conceding, indicating strong home control. However, in the last 5 matches FAR have managed only a 20% win rate and scored a total of 1 goal by half-time (0.2 on average), whereas Raja have an 80% win rate in their last 5 and have scored 6 first-half goals (1.2 on average), taking the lead at the break in 5 of 5 of those games. xG shows a slight advantage for the hosts (xG_for 1.47 versus Raja’s 1.36), but despite a higher xG_conceded for Raja (1.47 versus the hosts’ 0.79), Raja have been effective in the first half recently and score earlier. Given form (80% wins and 100% leads at the break in the visitors’ last 5), the most likely scenario is Raja leading at half-time and maintaining the win to full-time (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAR Rabat | Raja Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Raja Casablanca is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 2.6 pts / match - Raja Casablanca
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 1.31 goals / match - Raja Casablanca
Raja Casablanca is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.44 goals / match - FAR Rabat · 0.31 goals / match - Raja Casablanca
FAR Rabat scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 69% (11 of 16 matches).
Raja Casablanca scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 69% (11 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAR Rabat
Over / Under - Raja Casablanca
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Raja Casablanca is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - FAR Rabat · 2.13 pts / match - Raja Casablanca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Raja Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAR Rabat
Raja Casablanca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FAR Rabat | Liga | Raja Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 49% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 39% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 32% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FAR Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 Raja Casablanca. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca?
The Botola Pro match finished FAR Rabat 2:1 Raja Casablanca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca?
FAR Rabat score 1.56 goals per game on average and Raja Casablanca 1.31. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 31% of FAR Rabat's matches and 25% of Raja Casablanca's.
What form are FAR Rabat and Raja Casablanca in?
Over the last 5 games FAR Rabat have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Raja Casablanca 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca?
The statistical background for FAR Rabat vs Raja Casablanca — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


