Iran - Azadegan LeagueEnghelab StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Fard Alborz vs Saipa: match statistics

Fard Alborz crest
Fard Alborz
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Saipa crest
Saipa

Fard Alborz vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fard Alborz played Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Enghelab Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Fard Alborz: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Saipa: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fard Alborz scores 0.67 and concedes 0.43 goals per match. Saipa scores 0.83 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fard Alborz 17%, Saipa 27%. Over 2.5: Fard Alborz 10%, Saipa 27%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Saipa has higher xG: 1.17 vs 0.85. Fard Alborz: 2.9 shots per match, Saipa: 4.3.

Match halves

Fard Alborz: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.33. Saipa: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Fard Alborz: 16-30 (5 goals). Saipa: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.53 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Saipa is the favorite: they sit 4th in the table versus Fard Alborz in 9th and have 13 wins this season compared to the home side’s 8. The visitors create significantly more chances — averaging 9.4 shots and 4.4 on target per away match versus 5.33 and 2.5 for the hosts, and their xG per game is 1.30 versus Fard’s 0.88, indicating higher-quality chances. Saipa’s form is clearly superior: 3 wins and 2 draws in the last 5 give them 2.2 points per game, while Fard have 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per game). Still, the hosts have a solid home defense — conceding only 0.53 goals per game, keeping 60% clean sheets and with as many as 47% of home matches ending in a draw, and their shot conversion at home is 13% translating to 0.67 goals per match, so a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project a higher probability for "No" (BTTS - No) — given low seasonal BTTS rates: Fard Alborz 27% and Saipa 27%, versus a league average of 30%. Clean sheet metrics strongly signal a no-goal-for-both outcome: Fard has a 73% clean sheet rate at home, Saipa 60% away, and the league shows 94% of matches with at least one clean sheet. Seasonal goals averages are low — Fard scores 0.93 and concedes 0.40 per match, Saipa scores 0.73 and concedes 0.67 — despite xG of 1.12 (Fard) and 1.30 (Saipa), poor finishing (conversion 11% vs 6%) limits actual goals. The last 5 matches don’t change the picture: BTTS in the last five is only 20% for both teams, and Saipa concedes an average of 0.2 goals in the last 5, further reducing their chance of scoring. Considering the league goals average of 1.52 and the above indicators, I estimate BTTS probability at 22% vs 78% for no BTTS, therefore I recommend backing "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams are low-scoring: Fard Alborz averages 0.93 goals per match and has 73% clean sheets, Saipa 0.73 goals and 60% clean sheets. xG is 1.12 for the home side and 1.30 for the visitors, xG against is 0.79 (home) and 1.04 (away); averaging yields expected goals of 1.08 for the home team and 1.05 for the away team (total 2.13). A Poisson model with λ=2.13 indicates ~63% probability for >1.5 goals, ~36% for >2.5 and ~17% for >3.5, while historical Over shares this season are only 33% (1.5), 27% (2.5) and 7% (3.5). Combining the model and season data I suggest over1.5 ≈51%, over2.5 ≈32% and over3.5 ≈13%, therefore the strongest signal is under 2.5 (under ~68%, based on a seasonal 73% under2.5 and the Poisson model).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A strong signal for a half-time draw is that the home side are level at the break in 73% of their matches (11 of 15), while the visitors are level at half-time in 53% (8 of 15), which raises the probability of a draw before the break. After the interval, however, Fard Alborz has the edge: the home team scores on average 0.67 goals in the second half and have collected 23 points in second halves (an average of 1.53 points), whereas Saipa have 0.93 goals after the break and 21 points (an average of 1.4). Additionally, the hosts are more efficient at converting chances (shot conversion 11% versus Saipa’s 6%) and concede fewer goals per match on average (0.4 vs 0.67), increasing their chances of turning the game around after half-time. Considering the high proportion of half-time draws and Fard Alborz’s second-half advantage, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home victory (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Fard AlborzSaipa
7Shots12
Fard AlborzSaipa
4Shots on target1
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.94xG1.2
Fard AlborzSaipa
2Corners5
Fard AlborzSaipa
31Dangerous attacks54
Fard AlborzSaipa
-1Fouls-1
Fard AlborzSaipa
-1Cards-1
Fard AlborzSaipa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match0.83
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.43Goals conceded / match0.53
Fard AlborzSaipa
31%Average possession28%
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.97Shots on target / match1.37
Fard AlborzSaipa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.93Shots per match4.3
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.97Shots on target1.37
Fard AlborzSaipa
22.7%Shot conversion19.4%
Fard AlborzSaipa
31%Possession28%
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.85xG for1.17
Fard AlborzSaipa
1.05xG against0.87
Fard AlborzSaipa

Shooting quality

Fard Alborz: Counter-attackingSaipa: Counter-attacking
Fard AlborzSaipa
Accuracy (shots on target)33%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.290.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.690.61

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Saipa is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Fard Alborz · 2.2 pts / match - Saipa

Fard Alborz
LLWLW
Season result split
27% W50% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-7
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-7-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Saipa
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W37% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.60Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Fard Alborz · 0.83 goals / match - Saipa

Fard Alborz is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.43 goals / match - Fard Alborz · 0.53 goals / match - Saipa

Fard Alborz scoring profile: more difficult

Fard Alborz scores in 40% of matches (12 of 30 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (20 of 30 matches).

Saipa scoring profile: mixed

Saipa scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 63% (19 of 30 matches).

20Goals scored (season)25
Fard AlborzSaipa
13Goals conceded (season)16
Fard AlborzSaipa
1.1Average goals in match1.37
Fard AlborzSaipa
9Goals scored (last 5)4
Fard AlborzSaipa
5Goals conceded (last 5)1
Fard AlborzSaipa

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal63%
Fard AlborzSaipa
13%2 goals17%
Fard AlborzSaipa
3%3 goals3%
Fard AlborzSaipa
3%4 goals0%
Fard AlborzSaipa

How often they concede at least...

37%1 goal33%
Fard AlborzSaipa
7%2 goals17%
Fard AlborzSaipa
0%3 goals3%
Fard AlborzSaipa
0%4 goals0%
Fard AlborzSaipa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time7%
Fard AlborzSaipa
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Fard AlborzSaipa
13%Scored in both halves13%
Fard AlborzSaipa

BTTS and goal count

7%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Fard AlborzSaipa
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Fard AlborzSaipa
20%BTTS - last 520%
Fard AlborzSaipa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
Fard AlborzSaipa
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Fard AlborzSaipa
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Fard AlborzSaipa

2nd half

37%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Fard AlborzSaipa
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Fard AlborzSaipa
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Fard AlborzSaipa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saipa is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Fard Alborz · 1.43 pts / match - Saipa

Fard Alborz - half-time state
23% leading63% draw13% trailing
Saipa - half-time state
27% leading63% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.43
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.57
Fard AlborzSaipa
83%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Fard AlborzSaipa
73%No goal before half-time67%
Fard AlborzSaipa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.47
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.37
Fard AlborzSaipa
0.6Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Fard AlborzSaipa
80%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Fard AlborzSaipa
73%No goal after half-time57%
Fard AlborzSaipa

Fard Alborz - second-half results

17% W70% R13% P
40
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Saipa - second-half results

30% W57% R13% P
43
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fard Alborz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Saipa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fard Alborz
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
4
1
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
22%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fard Alborz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-24.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Fard AlborzLigaSaipa
Average goals in match 1.101.53 1.37
Both teams scored 17%30% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 10%21% 27%
Clean sheets 63%47% 67%
Goal before half-time 40%45% 43%
Goal after half-time 37%56% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.53
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.65
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
14%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fard Alborz 0 - 1 - 0 Saipa. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fard Alborz vs Saipa?

The Azadegan League match finished Fard Alborz 2:1 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fard Alborz vs Saipa?

Fard Alborz score 0.67 goals per game on average and Saipa 0.83. The Azadegan League average is 1.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Fard Alborz's matches and 27% of Saipa's.

What form are Fard Alborz and Saipa in?

Over the last 5 games Fard Alborz have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Saipa 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fard Alborz vs Saipa?

The statistical background for Fard Alborz vs Saipa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.