Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fard Alborz played Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 15 June 2026. Venue: Enghelab Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Fard Alborz: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Sanat Naft: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fard Alborz scores 0.61 and concedes 0.39 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 0.96 and concedes 0.64. League average: 1.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fard Alborz 14%, Sanat Naft 36%. Over 2.5: Fard Alborz 7%, Sanat Naft 25%. League level: BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.81. Fard Alborz: 2.7 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 4.0.
Match halves
Fard Alborz: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.29. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Fard Alborz: 16-30 (5 goals). Sanat Naft: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.51 goals per match, BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fard Alborz has a strong home defense — conceding only 0.43 goals per game on average and keeping a clean sheet in 64% of matches, while Sanat Naft concedes 0.69 on the road and records 46% clean sheets. Offensively recent form is skewed: Fard scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus Sanat’s 1, and Sanat has a very high share of away matches without scoring — 62%. Sanat, however, generates more chances (averaging 4.6 shots on target and xG 1.15 away), whereas Fard averages 2.45 shots on target and xG 0.87 at home, but the hosts are markedly more efficient in conversion (12% vs 5%). Historically Fard draws frequently at home (50% home draws), yet considering superior recent results (7 points in the last 5, averaging 1.4 points per game), defensive edge and conversion efficiency, the hosts possess a clear advantage. Based on these figures I predict a home win, with an estimated probability distribution: home 50%, draw 35%, away 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics indicate a moderate baseline chance for BTTS: Fard Alborz has BTTS in 47% of matches, Sanat Naft in 23%, and the league average is 28%, which by simple averaging yields approximately a 35% base probability. However, the key signals are negative for BTTS — in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 0%, and Sanat Naft averages only 0.2 goals in those five (Fard 1.4). Both sides frequently keep a clean sheet: Fard 47% and Sanat Naft 46%, and season goals conceded averages are 0.6 and 0.69, which increases the likelihood of a No Goal outcome. Despite similar xG (Fard 1.08 vs Sanat Naft 1.15), the visitors convert chances poorly (shot conversion 5% and season average goals 0.54), therefore I forecast 75% for 'no' and 25% for 'yes' (BTTS - No / BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.10 for Fard Alborz and 0.92 for Sanat Naft (total 2.02), calculated as the average of attacking xG and opponent’s defensive xG: home attack xG 1.08 vs away defense xG 1.12, and away attack xG 1.15 vs home defense xG 0.69. Fard Alborz averages 1.33 goals scored at home and concedes 0.60, registering 9.22 shots with 2.56 on target and a conversion rate of 13%, while Sanat Naft scores 0.54 goals away, concedes 0.69, has 7.4 shots with 4.6 on target and a 5% conversion. Seasonal metrics show home matches finish over 1.5 goals in 60% of games, whereas Sanat Naft away has 38% over 1.5; over 2.5 occurs in 33% of home matches and 15% of away matches, and over 3.5 only in 13% at home and 0% away. A Poisson model with λ=2.02 yields roughly a 60% chance for Over 1.5 goals, ~33% for Over 2.5 and ~15% for Over 3.5, aligning with seasonal proportions and indicating the strongest signal for Over 1.5. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (side: Over), because the combination of xG (1.08/1.15), higher home efficiency (conversion 13% vs 5%) and a seasonal 60% share of Over 1.5 provides the highest probability of success.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fard Alborz is the favorite on paper: they average 1.33 goals per match versus Sanat Naft’s 0.54 and have a 60% win rate this season compared to the visitors’ 23%, with average points of 2.13 vs 1.08. However, draws dominate at Half-Time — the home side are level at the break in 80% of matches, the away side in 69%, and Half-Time goals average 0.4 for Fard and 0.0 for Sanat; the hosts led at the break in only 13% of games, the visitors in 0%. In Second-Half performance Fard is more effective: they score an average of 0.93 goals after the break and win Second Halves in 53% of cases, whereas Sanat average 0.54 Second-Half goals and win 31% of Second Halves. Additionally the hosts convert 13% of shots versus 5% for the visitors, while xG is similar (1.08 vs 1.15), suggesting Sanat creates chances but Fard converts them more often; therefore I consider the most likely scenario to be a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fard Alborz | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.81 | 0.84 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fard Alborz is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Fard Alborz · 1 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 57% better for: goals scored per match.
0.61 goals / match - Fard Alborz · 0.96 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Fard Alborz is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.39 goals / match - Fard Alborz · 0.64 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Fard Alborz scores in 36% of matches (10 of 28 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 matches).
Sanat Naft scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 64% (18 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fard Alborz
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fard Alborz is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Fard Alborz · 0.96 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fard Alborz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fard Alborz
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Fard Alborz | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.00 | 1.51 | ▲ 1.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 14% | 29% | ▲ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 64% | 47% | • 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 39% | 46% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 32% | 54% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fard Alborz 0 - 0 - 1 Sanat Naft. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Fard Alborz 1:2 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?
Fard Alborz score 0.61 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.96. The Azadegan League average is 1.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Fard Alborz's matches and 36% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Fard Alborz and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Fard Alborz have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sanat Naft 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


