FAS vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAS played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 30 November 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
FAS: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAS scores 2.21 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.36 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAS 63%, Cacahuatique 59%. Over 2.5: FAS 58%, Cacahuatique 68%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
FAS has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.46. FAS: 11.0 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 9.1.
Match halves
FAS: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.21. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
FAS: 76-90+ (15 goals). Cacahuatique: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAS | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAS is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - FAS · 0.6 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 62% better for: goals scored per match.
2.21 goals / match - FAS · 1.36 goals / match - Cacahuatique
FAS is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - FAS · 1.45 goals / match - Cacahuatique
FAS scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Cacahuatique scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAS
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAS
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| FAS | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.38 | 2.74 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): FAS 2 - 1 - 0 Cacahuatique. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAS vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 0:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Cacahuatique?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Cacahuatique won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Cacahuatique?
FAS score 2.21 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.36. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of FAS's matches and 59% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are FAS and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Cacahuatique?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.