El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 22 October 2026

FAS vs Firpo: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Firpo crest
Firpo
135%(2.44)
X30%(2.97)
235%(2.80)

The match promises to be an exceptionally tight encounter between two of the league's top teams. FAS shows impressive home form with a 76% win rate at their ground and an average of 2.24 goals per match. However, Firpo boasts an even better overall record (24 wins this season) and higher scoring efficiency on the road (averaging 2.6 goals). A key factor is FAS's advantage in possession (56% vs. 50%) and their superior home defense (conceding 0.88 goals on average), which balances the visitors' attacking strength. Both teams are in excellent form – FAS with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, Firpo also with 4 victories. Considering the statistical balance, the high efficiency of both sides, and the fact that Firpo rarely keeps a clean sheet away from home (7% CS%), I anticipate an exciting, open match with a draw as the most likely scenario.

FAS vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

FAS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Firpo: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.06 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.11 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 59%, Firpo 58%. Over 2.5: FAS 53%, Firpo 58%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.55. FAS: 11.1 shots per match, Firpo: 11.5.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.15. Firpo: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.39.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (22 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (23 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be an exceptionally tight encounter between two of the league's top teams. FAS shows impressive home form with a 76% win rate at their ground and an average of 2.24 goals per match. However, Firpo boasts an even better overall record (24 wins this season) and higher scoring efficiency on the road (averaging 2.6 goals). A key factor is FAS's advantage in possession (56% vs. 50%) and their superior home defense (conceding 0.88 goals on average), which balances the visitors' attacking strength. Both teams are in excellent form – FAS with 4 wins in their last 5 matches, Firpo also with 4 victories. Considering the statistical balance, the high efficiency of both sides, and the fact that Firpo rarely keeps a clean sheet away from home (7% CS%), I anticipate an exciting, open match with a draw as the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FASFirpo
8Shots11
FASFirpo
2Shots on target2
FASFirpo
1.16xG1.23
FASFirpo
4Corners1
FASFirpo
70Dangerous attacks54
FASFirpo
-1Fouls-1
FASFirpo
-1Cards-1
FASFirpo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.06Goals scored / match2.11
FASFirpo
1.03Goals conceded / match1.06
FASFirpo
53%Average possession52%
FASFirpo
5.09Shots on target / match5.5
FASFirpo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.09Shots per match11.5
FASFirpo
5.09Shots on target5.5
FASFirpo
18.6%Shot conversion18.4%
FASFirpo
53%Possession52%
FASFirpo
1.55xG for1.8
FASFirpo
1.2xG against1.2
FASFirpo

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingFirpo: Efficient finishing
FASFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)46%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 8% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - FAS · 2.4 pts / match - Firpo

FAS
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W26% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-5
2.03 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Firpo
WWWLW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
24-8-4
2.22 pts / match · goal difference +38
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-3-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (30 of 34 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (12 of 36 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 matches).

70Goals scored (season)76
FASFirpo
35Goals conceded (season)38
FASFirpo
3.09Average goals in match3.17
FASFirpo
9Goals scored (last 5)10
FASFirpo
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
FASFirpo

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal83%
FASFirpo
59%2 goals64%
FASFirpo
35%3 goals50%
FASFirpo
12%4 goals8%
FASFirpo

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal67%
FASFirpo
26%2 goals25%
FASFirpo
9%3 goals8%
FASFirpo
0%4 goals3%
FASFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time22%
FASFirpo
9%BTTS in both halves8%
FASFirpo
47%Scored in both halves47%
FASFirpo

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FASFirpo
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FASFirpo
60%BTTS - last 560%
FASFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
FASFirpo
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
FASFirpo
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
FASFirpo

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
FASFirpo
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
FASFirpo
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
FASFirpo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS - half-time state
38% leading44% draw18% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
36% leading44% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.53
FASFirpo
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.72
FASFirpo
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
FASFirpo
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.19
FASFirpo
65%Clean sheet before half-time67%
FASFirpo
44%No goal before half-time47%
FASFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.76Points per match (2nd half)2.33
FASFirpo
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)1.39
FASFirpo
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
FASFirpo
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.97
FASFirpo
53%Clean sheet after half-time56%
FASFirpo
24%No goal after half-time22%
FASFirpo

FAS - second-half results

47% W35% D18% L
54
Half-time points
30
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding155%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - second-half results

72% W17% D11% L
55
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
84
Second-half points
+29
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
12
3
16-30
11
9
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
2
61-75
22
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
10
5
0-15
7
4
16-30
9
8
31-45
11
9
46-60
23
6
61-75
16
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (23 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaFirpo
Average goals in match▲ 3.092.72▲ 3.17
Both teams scored▲ 59%56%▲ 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 53%53%▲ 58%
Clean sheets▲ 32%26%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%69%▼ 64%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%77%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1
—Nelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalNelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez
  2. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Elmer MartínezMatches officiated: 18
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 239%Home wins28%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): FAS 0 - 0 - 2 Firpo. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Firpo
3 : 1
FAS
FAS
2 : 3
Firpo

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 2:0 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Firpo?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FAS won 0, Firpo won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Firpo?

FAS score 2.06 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.11. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of FAS's matches and 58% of Firpo's.

What form are FAS and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Firpo 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Firpo?

The statistical background for FAS vs Firpo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.