El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Óscar Alberto QuiteñoData current as of 22 October 2026

FAS vs INCA-Aruba: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
1 : 1half-time 1:0
INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba

FAS vs INCA-Aruba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS played INCA-Aruba in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 5 October 2026. Venue: Estadio Óscar Alberto Quiteño. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FAS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. INCA-Aruba: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 1.91 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. INCA-Aruba scores 0.85 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 55%, INCA-Aruba 54%. Over 2.5: FAS 55%, INCA-Aruba 46%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.30. FAS: 12.6 shots per match, INCA-Aruba: 8.5.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.09. INCA-Aruba: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (9 goals). INCA-Aruba: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS are the favourites: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and remain unbeaten, scoring 11 goals in that run. They win 75% of their home games and average 2 goals, while INCA-Aruba lose 67% of their away matches and concede an average of 2 goals in them. The hosts also create more chances: their home xG is 1.82 compared with the visitors’ away xG of 1.11, and they average 6 shots on target against 2.83. FAS concede an average of 0.75 goals at home, while INCA-Aruba score just 0.67 goals per away game and fail to score in 33% of those matches. The visitors have improved recently, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, but FAS’s advantage at both ends of the pitch points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored in 50% of their matches this season, and that figure has risen to 60% for each side across their last five games, so BTTS - Yes cannot be ruled out. However, the stronger signal points towards BTTS - No, which means at least one team is expected not to score—not necessarily a 0-0 draw. The visitors average just 0.67 goals and 2.83 shots on target per match, while the hosts average 0.83 goals and 5 shots on target. INCA-Aruba have failed to score in 33% of their matches, and FAS have kept a clean sheet in 33%, increasing the risk of the visitors ending the game without a goal. FAS’s recent defensive form also lends cautious support to this outcome, with an average of 0.8 goals conceded across their last five matches, although the visitors’ average of 1.2 goals scored over that period limits confidence in the prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 67% of FAS matches and 83% of INCA-Aruba matches. The hosts have the edge in chance creation, averaging 1.51 xG compared with their opponents’ 1.11, while the visitors concede an average of 2.0 goals per match. FAS have averaged 2.2 goals across their last five matches, further supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Higher lines are less convincing: Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of the hosts’ matches and 33% of the visitors’ matches, while Over 3.5 goals has landed in 33% of matches for both sides.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a FAS win: across the 6 home matches considered, the hosts have not led at the break and have been level on 3 occasions. Their recent form, however, points to a win—they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while INCA-Aruba have lost 67% of the matches included in the season statistics. FAS average 5 shots on target per match compared with the visitors’ 2.83, and their xG stands at 1.51 versus their opponents’ 1.11, indicating greater attacking potential. A second-half decision is all the more likely given that FAS average 0.83 goals after the break, while INCA-Aruba concede 1.5. The case for a half-time draw is not clear-cut, as FAS led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, making a scenario in which the hosts lead from half-time a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
FASINCA-Aruba
7Shots7
FASINCA-Aruba
2Shots on target3
FASINCA-Aruba
1.23xG1.1
FASINCA-Aruba
5Corners4
FASINCA-Aruba
88Dangerous attacks62
FASINCA-Aruba
11Fouls16
FASINCA-Aruba
0Cards0
FASINCA-Aruba

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.91Goals scored / match0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
0.91Goals conceded / match1.69
FASINCA-Aruba
57%Average possession45%
FASINCA-Aruba
8.27Shots on target / match3.92
FASINCA-Aruba

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.55Shots per match8.54
FASINCA-Aruba
8.27Shots on target3.92
FASINCA-Aruba
15.2%Shot conversion9.9%
FASINCA-Aruba
57%Possession45%
FASINCA-Aruba
1.77xG for1.3
FASINCA-Aruba
1.49xG against1.8
FASINCA-Aruba

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingINCA-Aruba: Balanced
FASINCA-Aruba
Accuracy (shots on target)66%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - FAS · 2 pts / match - INCA-Aruba

FAS
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
64% W18% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-2
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
INCA-Aruba
WLWDW
Season result split
31% W23% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 125% better for: goals scored per match.

1.91 goals / match - FAS · 0.85 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

FAS is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - FAS · 1.69 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: strong

INCA-Aruba scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

21Goals scored (season)11
FASINCA-Aruba
10Goals conceded (season)22
FASINCA-Aruba
2.82Average goals in match2.54
FASINCA-Aruba
11Goals scored (last 5)7
FASINCA-Aruba
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
FASINCA-Aruba

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal69%
FASINCA-Aruba
55%2 goals15%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%3 goals0%
FASINCA-Aruba
9%4 goals0%
FASINCA-Aruba

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal77%
FASINCA-Aruba
27%2 goals46%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals31%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals15%
FASINCA-Aruba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time8%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FASINCA-Aruba
18%Scored in both halves0%
FASINCA-Aruba

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
FASINCA-Aruba
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FASINCA-Aruba
60%BTTS - last 580%
FASINCA-Aruba

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
FASINCA-Aruba
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
FASINCA-Aruba
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
FASINCA-Aruba

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
FASINCA-Aruba
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
FASINCA-Aruba

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - FAS · 0.85 pts / match - INCA-Aruba

FAS - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing
INCA-Aruba - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.23
FASINCA-Aruba
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
FASINCA-Aruba
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
64%Clean sheet before half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba
55%No goal before half-time85%
FASINCA-Aruba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per match (2nd half)1
FASINCA-Aruba
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
FASINCA-Aruba
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
FASINCA-Aruba
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.69
FASINCA-Aruba
64%Clean sheet after half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%No goal after half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba

FAS - second-half results

55% W18% D27% L
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

23% W31% D46% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
INCA-Aruba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaINCA-Aruba
Average goals in match▲ 2.822.59• 2.54
Both teams scored▲ 55%53%• 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%49%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▲ 36%30%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time• 64%65%▼ 62%
Goal after half-time▲ 82%75%▲ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Juan Alfredo Barahona Peña⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  2. INCA-ArubaGoalJuan Alfredo Barahona Peña

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FAS 1 - 0 - 0 INCA-Aruba. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 1:1 INCA-Aruba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

FAS score 1.91 goals per game on average and INCA-Aruba 0.85. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 54% of INCA-Aruba's.

What form are FAS and INCA-Aruba in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and INCA-Aruba 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs INCA-Aruba: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.