El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

FAS vs Inter: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Inter crest
Inter
165%(1.75)
X22%(3.50)
213%(4.51)

FAS displays dominant form at home with a 75% win rate in home matches and an impressive goal difference of +21. The hosts score an average of 2.19 goals per game at home, with only 6% of matches failing to score, which highlights their offensive strength. Inter, however, performs significantly worse on the road – with only 23% wins, 46% losses, and a negative goal difference of -4. The visiting team also struggles to score away from home (38% of matches without a goal, averaging 1.31 goals). Both teams are in good form over their last five matches (2.2 points per game), however, FAS's home advantage and Inter's away weakness strongly favor a home win. The disparity between FAS's home quality and Inter's away form is so pronounced that a draw appears less likely than a solid home victory.

FAS vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS play Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 19 February 2026 at 02:30. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Inter: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 52%, Inter 51%. Over 2.5: FAS 52%, Inter 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.25. FAS: 11.0 shots per match, Inter: 7.8.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12. Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). Inter: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

FAS displays dominant form at home with a 75% win rate in home matches and an impressive goal difference of +21. The hosts score an average of 2.19 goals per game at home, with only 6% of matches failing to score, which highlights their offensive strength. Inter, however, performs significantly worse on the road – with only 23% wins, 46% losses, and a negative goal difference of -4. The visiting team also struggles to score away from home (38% of matches without a goal, averaging 1.31 goals). Both teams are in good form over their last five matches (2.2 points per game), however, FAS's home advantage and Inter's away weakness strongly favor a home win. The disparity between FAS's home quality and Inter's away form is so pronounced that a draw appears less likely than a solid home victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
FASInter
11Shots7
FASInter
8Shots on target4
FASInter
1.57xG1.07
FASInter
4Corners3
FASInter
43Dangerous attacks48
FASInter
18Fouls15
FASInter
0Cards0
FASInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.1Goals scored / match1.13
FASInter
0.92Goals conceded / match1.4
FASInter
53%Average possession53%
FASInter
5Shots on target / match3.56
FASInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match7.78
FASInter
5Shots on target3.56
FASInter
19.1%Shot conversion14.6%
FASInter
53%Possession53%
FASInter
1.53xG for1.25
FASInter
1.2xG against1.22
FASInter

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingInter: Efficient finishing
FASInter
Accuracy (shots on target)45%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FAS · 1.8 pts / match - Inter

FAS
DDLWW
Season result split
62% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
32-13-7
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +61
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
20-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Inter
WWLLW
Season result split
29% W33% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-17
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-11
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

2.1 goals / match - FAS · 1.13 goals / match - Inter

FAS is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - FAS · 1.4 goals / match - Inter

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 45 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (29 of 45 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).

109Goals scored (season)51
FASInter
48Goals conceded (season)63
FASInter
3.02Average goals in match2.53
FASInter
7Goals scored (last 5)5
FASInter
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
FASInter

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal64%
FASInter
62%2 goals40%
FASInter
37%3 goals9%
FASInter
12%4 goals0%
FASInter

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal73%
FASInter
23%2 goals47%
FASInter
8%3 goals16%
FASInter
0%4 goals2%
FASInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time20%
FASInter
6%BTTS in both halves4%
FASInter
46%Scored in both halves16%
FASInter

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
FASInter
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FASInter
40%BTTS - last 540%
FASInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
FASInter
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
FASInter
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
FASInter

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
FASInter
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
FASInter
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
FASInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - FAS · 1.18 pts / match - Inter

FAS - half-time state
44% leading40% draw15% trailing
Inter - half-time state
22% leading51% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.18
FASInter
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.49
FASInter
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
FASInter
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.11
FASInter
67%Clean sheet before half-time56%
FASInter
38%No goal before half-time64%
FASInter

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.27
FASInter
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
FASInter
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
FASInter
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.42
FASInter
60%Clean sheet after half-time44%
FASInter
29%No goal after half-time56%
FASInter

FAS - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
90
Half-time points
50
Half-time goals
+29
Goal difference (1st half)
95
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
53
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
18
4
0-15
17
5
16-30
16
13
31-45
11
10
46-60
17
6
61-75
30
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
14
16-30
13
9
31-45
11
8
46-60
6
10
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaInter
Average goals in match 3.022.67 2.53
Both teams scored 52%53% 51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%50% 53%
Clean sheets 38%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 60%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): FAS 2 - 1 - 0 Inter. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Inter
2 : 2
FAS
Inter
0 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 3:1 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Inter?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Inter won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Inter?

FAS score 2.10 goals per game on average and Inter 1.13. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FAS's matches and 51% of Inter's.

What form are FAS and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Inter 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Inter?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.