El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 September 2026

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Isidro Metapán crest
Isidro Metapán
165%(2.00)
X20%(3.00)
215%(3.50)

FAS displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 75% of their home matches and scoring an average of 2.17 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive home goal difference of +15 and a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 16%). Isidro Metapán performs poorly on the road with only 42% wins and 25% of matches failing to score, while their recent form (0.8 PPG) is considerably worse than that of the hosts (1.8 PPG). The difference in average xG (1.52 vs 1.15) and ball possession (57% vs 47%) further favors FAS. Considering all parameters, especially the home side's dominance at their own stadium and the visitors' poor form, an FAS victory is the most probable scenario.

FAS vs Isidro Metapán: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS played Isidro Metapán in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

FAS: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Isidro Metapán: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.12 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Isidro Metapán scores 1.33 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 60%, Isidro Metapán 58%. Over 2.5: FAS 56%, Isidro Metapán 63%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.31. FAS: 11.1 shots per match, Isidro Metapán: 9.2.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.16. Isidro Metapán: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (15 goals). Isidro Metapán: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 75% of their home matches and scoring an average of 2.17 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive home goal difference of +15 and a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 16%). Isidro Metapán performs poorly on the road with only 42% wins and 25% of matches failing to score, while their recent form (0.8 PPG) is considerably worse than that of the hosts (1.8 PPG). The difference in average xG (1.52 vs 1.15) and ball possession (57% vs 47%) further favors FAS. Considering all parameters, especially the home side's dominance at their own stadium and the visitors' poor form, an FAS victory is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
FASIsidro Metapán
9Shots9
FASIsidro Metapán
5Shots on target6
FASIsidro Metapán
1.35xG1.28
FASIsidro Metapán
4Corners6
FASIsidro Metapán
59Dangerous attacks40
FASIsidro Metapán
18Fouls16
FASIsidro Metapán
0Cards0
FASIsidro Metapán

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.12Goals scored / match1.33
FASIsidro Metapán
1.16Goals conceded / match1.25
FASIsidro Metapán
53%Average possession49%
FASIsidro Metapán
5.12Shots on target / match4.46
FASIsidro Metapán

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.12Shots per match9.21
FASIsidro Metapán
5.12Shots on target4.46
FASIsidro Metapán
19.1%Shot conversion14.5%
FASIsidro Metapán
53%Possession49%
FASIsidro Metapán
1.61xG for1.31
FASIsidro Metapán
1.23xG against1.33
FASIsidro Metapán

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingIsidro Metapán: Efficient finishing
FASIsidro Metapán
Accuracy (shots on target)46%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - FAS · 0.8 pts / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS
WLWWL
Season result split
56% W24% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-6-5
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Isidro Metapán
DLWLL
Season result split
42% W25% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

2.12 goals / match - FAS · 1.33 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - FAS · 1.25 goals / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

Isidro Metapán scoring profile: strong

Isidro Metapán scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

53Goals scored (season)32
FASIsidro Metapán
29Goals conceded (season)30
FASIsidro Metapán
3.28Average goals in match2.58
FASIsidro Metapán
10Goals scored (last 5)4
FASIsidro Metapán
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal71%
FASIsidro Metapán
60%2 goals54%
FASIsidro Metapán
36%3 goals8%
FASIsidro Metapán
16%4 goals0%
FASIsidro Metapán

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal75%
FASIsidro Metapán
32%2 goals42%
FASIsidro Metapán
12%3 goals8%
FASIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals0%
FASIsidro Metapán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time17%
FASIsidro Metapán
8%BTTS in both halves0%
FASIsidro Metapán
48%Scored in both halves21%
FASIsidro Metapán

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
FASIsidro Metapán
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FASIsidro Metapán
80%BTTS - last 540%
FASIsidro Metapán

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FASIsidro Metapán
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FASIsidro Metapán
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
FASIsidro Metapán

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
FASIsidro Metapán
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
FASIsidro Metapán
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
FASIsidro Metapán

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Isidro Metapán is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - FAS · 1.71 pts / match - Isidro Metapán

FAS - half-time state
36% leading40% draw24% trailing
Isidro Metapán - half-time state
46% leading33% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.71
FASIsidro Metapán
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.83
FASIsidro Metapán
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
FASIsidro Metapán
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.21
FASIsidro Metapán
56%Clean sheet before half-time63%
FASIsidro Metapán
44%No goal before half-time46%
FASIsidro Metapán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per match (2nd half)0.79
FASIsidro Metapán
1.16Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
FASIsidro Metapán
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
FASIsidro Metapán
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.38
FASIsidro Metapán
56%Clean sheet after half-time42%
FASIsidro Metapán
28%No goal after half-time63%
FASIsidro Metapán

FAS - second-half results

44% W36% D20% L
37
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Isidro Metapán - second-half results

13% W42% D46% L
41
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 42%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Isidro Metapán - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
9
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
5
8
46-60
9
1
61-75
15
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Isidro Metapán
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
1
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Isidro Metapán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaIsidro Metapán
Average goals in match 3.282.75 2.58
Both teams scored 60%56% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%55% 63%
Clean sheets 28%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 80%69% 75%
Goal after half-time 84%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1
Kevin Oswaldo Santamaría Guzmán⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Kevin Stiven Reyes Ortiz⚽ 1
Steven Antonio Guerra Tejada⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Isidro MetapánGoalKevin Stiven Reyes Ortiz
  2. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  3. Isidro MetapánGoalSteven Antonio Guerra Tejada
  4. FASGoalKevin Oswaldo Santamaría Guzmán

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Germán MartínezMatches officiated: 22
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins23%Draws32%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): FAS 2 - 0 - 0 Isidro Metapán. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Isidro Metapán
2 : 3
FAS
FAS
1 : 0
Isidro Metapán

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 2:2 Isidro Metapán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Isidro Metapán?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Isidro Metapán won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

FAS score 2.12 goals per game on average and Isidro Metapán 1.33. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 60% of FAS's matches and 58% of Isidro Metapán's.

What form are FAS and Isidro Metapán in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Isidro Metapán 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Isidro Metapán?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.