Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin: match statistics
Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fasil Ketema played Ethiopian Medhin in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 1 July 2026. Venue: Polisportivo Comunale di Tarvisio. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Fasil Ketema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Ethiopian Medhin: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fasil Ketema scores 0.73 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Ethiopian Medhin scores 0.81 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fasil Ketema 27%, Ethiopian Medhin 44%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 19%, Ethiopian Medhin 25%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Ethiopian Medhin has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.13. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Ethiopian Medhin: 7.4.
Match halves
Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.41. Ethiopian Medhin: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Ethiopian Medhin: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fasil Ketema (5th) holds the edge over Ethiopian Medhin (15th) primarily due to a solid home defence: the hosts concede on average 0.78 goals per home match and record a clean sheet in 50% of home games, while the visitors concede 0.89 goals on the road and keep a clean sheet in only 28% of away fixtures. Offensively Ethiopian Medhin look better on paper — the visitors score 0.94 goals per away match and have an xG of 1.24 versus 0.78 scored and home xG of 1.11 in home games; the visitors also register more shots on target (3.17 vs 2.5) and have a higher conversion rate (13% vs 11%). In the last five matches Fasil have scored 4 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game (2 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses), whereas Medhin have scored 2 goals and average 1.0 point (1-2-2), giving the hosts a slight form advantage. Additionally, the visitors record a high share of draws away — 44% of matches — while the hosts have only 22% draws at home and 44% wins, increasing the likelihood that Fasil will actively seek victory. Considering the better home defence and superior league position, I project a home win; estimated probabilities are 55% for Fasil Ketema, 25% draw and 20% for Ethiopian Medhin.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have low scoring averages: Fasil Ketema scores 0.67 goals per match and Ethiopian Medhin 0.94, with average goals conceded 0.78 and 0.89 respectively, indicating generally low-scoring affairs. Seasonal BTTS rates are divergent (home 33% vs away 56%, league average 40%), but in the last 5 matches both teams have only a 20% BTTS rate, so recently both sides rarely scored. xG shows both teams generate 1.24 xG per game, but finishing is poor (actual goal averages 0.67 and 0.94) and conversion rates are 9% vs 13%, which limits the probability of mutual scoring. Additionally, clean sheet rates are 33% for the home side and 28% for the away side, and in the last 5 matches the home team scored 4 and conceded 4, while the away team scored 2 and conceded 5, which further supports the scenario that one of the teams will remain goalless. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 36% (Yes) and 64% (No) and recommend the pick "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 2.48 (1.24 for Fasil and 1.24 for Ethiopian Medhin), but actual seasonal averages are 0.67 for Fasil and 0.94 for Medhin (total 1.61), indicating a large discrepancy between created chances and goals scored. Fasil averages 7.88 shots with 2.82 on target and a conversion rate of 9%, while Medhin averages 7.5 shots with 3.17 on target and a 13% conversion rate — finishing ability is limited despite decent xG. Seasonal over 2.5 percentages are 22% (Fasil) and 28% (Medhin), with under 2.5 occurring in 78% and 72% of matches — this is the strongest signal in favor of Under 2.5. I estimate a total of about 1.95 goals (Fasil ~0.85, Medhin ~1.10), therefore I recommend betting Under 2.5 as the best line; Over 1.5 is moderately likely (~66%), and Over 3.5 is practically impossible (~4%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to a Half-Time/Full-Time draw/draw: hosts were level at the break in 61% of matches, visitors in 72%, and the percentage of clean halves for both teams is 67% each, indicating many goalless or drawn breaks. The full-time result also has a high probability of a draw — both teams have 44% of matches ending level, and the xG for both sides is identical at 1.24 vs 1.24, meaning the offenses are evenly matched. Few goals are scored before half-time (AVGHT_home 0.78 vs AVGHT_away 0.89; hosts average 0.39 goals before the break, visitors 0.56) and hosts have a lower shot conversion (9% versus 13% for visitors), which increases the likelihood of the draw holding. Given a 67% chance of a draw at half-time and 44% at full-time, I assigned X/X the highest probability (27%), while 1/1 (17%) and 2/2 (12%) reflect the risk of leads at the break (hosts lead in 22% of matches, visitors in 17%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fasil Ketema | Ethiopian Medhin | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fasil Ketema is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1 pts / match - Ethiopian Medhin
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ethiopian Medhin is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.81 goals / match - Ethiopian Medhin
Fasil Ketema is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.83 goals / match - Ethiopian Medhin
Fasil Ketema scores in 57% of matches (21 of 37 matches), while Ethiopian Medhin keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
Ethiopian Medhin scores in 56% of matches (20 of 36 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 54% (20 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fasil Ketema
Over / Under - Ethiopian Medhin
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fasil Ketema is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.25 pts / match - Ethiopian Medhin
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fasil Ketema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ethiopian Medhin - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fasil Ketema
Ethiopian Medhin
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Fasil Ketema | Liga | Ethiopian Medhin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.49 | 1.78 | ▼ 1.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 40% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 28% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 40% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 35% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | • 59% | 59% | • 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Ethiopian Medhin. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 1:0 Ethiopian Medhin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin?
Fasil Ketema score 0.73 goals per game on average and Ethiopian Medhin 0.81. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 44% of Ethiopian Medhin's.
What form are Fasil Ketema and Ethiopian Medhin in?
Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ethiopian Medhin 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fasil Ketema vs Ethiopian Medhin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


