Fasil Ketema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 29 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.82 and concedes 0.27 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.73 and concedes 0.36. League average: 1.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 27%, Mebrat Hayl 18%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 0%, Mebrat Hayl 9%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.13. Fasil Ketema: 9.4 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.0.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.45. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 0-15 (2 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.84 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
7Shots9
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
4Shots on target2
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.91xG1.04
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0Corners8
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
25Dangerous attacks45
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
7Fouls7
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0Cards0
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.82Goals scored / match0.73
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.27Goals conceded / match0.36
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
46%Average possession52%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
3.36Shots on target / match1.91
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.36Shots per match7
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
3.36Shots on target1.91
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
8.7%Shot conversion10.4%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
46%Possession52%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
1.35xG for1.13
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
1.23xG against1.1
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)36%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W55% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-0
1.91 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Mebrat Hayl
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W45% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-1
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.73 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Fasil Ketema is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.27 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.36 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 73% (8 of 11 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: more difficult

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 73% (8 of 11 matches).

9Goals scored (season)8
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
3Goals conceded (season)4
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
1.09Average goals in match1.09
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal55%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
9%2 goals9%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%3 goals9%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

27%1 goal27%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%2 goals9%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%3 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%Scored in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
40%BTTS - last 520%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

36%Min. 1 goal before half-time18%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

45%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.82 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
27% leading73% draw0% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
0% leading82% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)0.82
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.18
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
91%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
64%No goal before half-time100%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)2
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.18
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
0.64Average goals (2nd half)0.91
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
82%Clean sheet after half-time91%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl
64%No goal after half-time45%
Fasil KetemaMebrat Hayl

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

27% W64% R9% P
17
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

55% W36% R9% P
9
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
5
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
59%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
23%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.96
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
30%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.091.84 1.09
Both teams scored 27%46% 18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%30% 9%
Clean sheets 73%35% 73%
Goal before half-time 36%59% 18%
Goal after half-time 45%61% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.84
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 1:0 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Fasil Ketema score 0.82 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.73. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 18% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mebrat Hayl?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fasil Ketema vs Mebrat Hayl: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.