Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mekelakeya crest
Mekelakeya
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Mekelakeya presents a significantly better offensive form, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per away match with a 20% conversion rate, whereas Fasil Ketema scores an average of only 0.73 goals in home matches. The visitors boast a much higher average ball possession (60% vs 44%) and record more shots on target (3.45 vs 3), which proves their offensive dominance. Fasil Ketema is going through a crisis of form, losing four of their last five matches and earning merely 0.2 points per game, which drastically weakens their chances. Mekelakeya has a positive away goal difference (+6) and a 45% win rate, making them the favorite in this clash. Additionally, the visitors score in 91% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' poor form, gives them a clear advantage to claim the victory.

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema play Mekelakeya in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 13 March 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Mekelakeya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Mekelakeya scores 1.15 and concedes 0.85. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Mekelakeya 41%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 18%, Mekelakeya 31%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelakeya has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.14. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Mekelakeya: 8.6.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42. Mekelakeya: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Mekelakeya: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mekelakeya presents a significantly better offensive form, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per away match with a 20% conversion rate, whereas Fasil Ketema scores an average of only 0.73 goals in home matches. The visitors boast a much higher average ball possession (60% vs 44%) and record more shots on target (3.45 vs 3), which proves their offensive dominance. Fasil Ketema is going through a crisis of form, losing four of their last five matches and earning merely 0.2 points per game, which drastically weakens their chances. Mekelakeya has a positive away goal difference (+6) and a 45% win rate, making them the favorite in this clash. Additionally, the visitors score in 91% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' poor form, gives them a clear advantage to claim the victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4Shots7
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1Shots on target1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.79xG1.03
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0Corners2
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
64Dangerous attacks70
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
-1Fouls-1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
-1Cards-1
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.74Goals scored / match1.15
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.74Goals conceded / match0.85
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
46%Average possession56%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
2.24Shots on target / match2.9
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.24Shots per match8.64
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
2.24Shots on target2.9
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
10.2%Shot conversion13.4%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
46%Possession56%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.14xG for1.32
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.1xG against0.98
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedMekelakeya: Efficient finishing
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.8 pts / match - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Mekelakeya
LLWLD
Season result split
36% W41% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-16-9
1.49 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-7-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.15 goals / match - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.85 goals / match - Mekelakeya

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 46% (18 of 39 matches).

Mekelakeya scoring profile: mixed

Mekelakeya scores in 67% of matches (26 of 39 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)45
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
28Goals conceded (season)33
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.47Average goals in match2
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal67%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
11%2 goals33%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
5%3 goals13%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%4 goals3%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal54%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
21%2 goals23%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
8%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%4 goals3%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time18%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
8%Scored in both halves15%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0%BTTS - last 520%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time54%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing
Mekelakeya - half-time state
31% leading51% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.44
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.45Average goals (1st half)1.05
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
87%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
71%No goal before half-time59%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.9
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
63%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya
63%No goal after half-time62%
Fasil KetemaMekelakeya

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelakeya - second-half results

23% W56% R21% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mekelakeya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
7
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaMekelakeya
Average goals in match 1.471.78 2.00
Both teams scored 26%40% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 31%
Clean sheets 55%40% 46%
Goal before half-time 34%56% 59%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 54%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelakeya. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Mekelakeya
0 : 0
Fasil Ketema

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:0 Mekelakeya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Mekelakeya 1.15. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 41% of Mekelakeya's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Mekelakeya in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Mekelakeya 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelakeya: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.