Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 15 October 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni: match statistics

155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Fasil Ketema presents significantly better home form with 50% wins at home and an impressive 60% clean sheet rate, testifying to a solid defense. The hosts sit in 4th place, while Welwalo Adigrat Uni is in 19th position, reflecting the quality gap between the two teams. The visitors have very poor efficiency away with only 20% wins and 50% of matches without scoring, which constitutes their biggest weakness. Fasil Ketema's positive goal difference in home matches (+2) and slightly better xG statistics (1.09 vs 1.06 for the guests) suggest an advantage for the hosts. The recent form of both teams (1.6 PPG for Fasil Ketema vs 1.2 PPG for the guests) and a series of draws by Welwalo Adigrat indicate the visitors will play defensively, which may lead to a low score or a draw, but the hosts' advantage should be decisive.

Fasil Ketema vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema played Welwalo Adigrat Uni in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 27 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.75 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores 0.62 and concedes 1.14. League average: 1.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 25%, Welwalo Adigrat Uni 48%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 10%, Welwalo Adigrat Uni 29%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 26%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.18 vs 0.98. Fasil Ketema: 7.8 shots per match, Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 5.4.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.45. Welwalo Adigrat Uni: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (4 goals). Welwalo Adigrat Uni: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.73 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 26%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fasil Ketema presents significantly better home form with 50% wins at home and an impressive 60% clean sheet rate, testifying to a solid defense. The hosts sit in 4th place, while Welwalo Adigrat Uni is in 19th position, reflecting the quality gap between the two teams. The visitors have very poor efficiency away with only 20% wins and 50% of matches without scoring, which constitutes their biggest weakness. Fasil Ketema's positive goal difference in home matches (+2) and slightly better xG statistics (1.09 vs 1.06 for the guests) suggest an advantage for the hosts. The recent form of both teams (1.6 PPG for Fasil Ketema vs 1.2 PPG for the guests) and a series of draws by Welwalo Adigrat indicate the visitors will play defensively, which may lead to a low score or a draw, but the hosts' advantage should be decisive.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
7Shots4
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
1Shots on target2
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
1.05xG0.9
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
3Corners4
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
73Dangerous attacks69
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
-1Fouls-1
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
-1Cards-1
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.75Goals scored / match0.62
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.55Goals conceded / match1.14
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
44%Average possession45%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
2.8Shots on target / match2.24
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.8Shots per match5.38
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
2.8Shots on target2.24
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
9.6%Shot conversion11.5%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
44%Possession45%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
1.18xG for0.98
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
1.13xG against1.11
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedWelwalo Adigrat Uni: Balanced
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.2 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Fasil Ketema
WWDLL
Season result split
40% W45% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-3
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Welwalo Adigrat Uni
DWLDD
Season result split
14% W43% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-9
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.62 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Fasil Ketema is 107% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.55 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.14 goals / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Welwalo Adigrat Uni keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

Welwalo Adigrat Uni scoring profile: more difficult

Welwalo Adigrat Uni scores in 52% of matches (11 of 21 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 65% (13 of 20 matches).

15Goals scored (season)13
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
11Goals conceded (season)24
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
1.3Average goals in match1.76
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal52%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
10%2 goals10%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%3 goals0%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

How often they concede at least...

35%1 goal71%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
15%2 goals33%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0%4 goals5%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 21 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time19%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%Scored in both halves5%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

BTTS and goal count

10%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
40%BTTS - last 580%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time43%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.19 pts / match - Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
20% leading75% draw5% trailing
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - half-time state
19% leading62% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.19
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.15Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.81
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
85%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
75%No goal before half-time62%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)0.81
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
0.85Average goals (2nd half)0.86
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
70%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
60%No goal after half-time81%
Fasil KetemaWelwalo Adigrat Uni

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

25% W55% D20% L
27
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Welwalo Adigrat Uni - second-half results

5% W67% D29% L
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Welwalo Adigrat Uni - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Welwalo Adigrat Uni
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
8
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Welwalo Adigrat Uni

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaWelwalo Adigrat Uni
Average goals in match▼ 1.301.73• 1.76
Both teams scored▼ 25%40%▲ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 10%26%▲ 29%
Clean sheets▲ 65%41%▼ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 30%53%▲ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 55%57%▼ 43%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.73
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
0.88
Home goals / match
0.84
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Hafiz Wontah Konkoni⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Welwalo Adigrat UniGoalHafiz Wontah Konkoni

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 1 - 0 - 0 Welwalo Adigrat Uni. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Welwalo Adigrat Uni
0 : 2
Fasil Ketema

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 1:2 Welwalo Adigrat Uni. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?

Fasil Ketema score 0.75 goals per game on average and Welwalo Adigrat Uni 0.62. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 48% of Welwalo Adigrat Uni's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Welwalo Adigrat Uni in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Welwalo Adigrat Uni 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Welwalo Adigrat Uni?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.