FC Andorra vs Málaga CF: match statistics
FC Andorra vs Málaga CF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Andorra played Málaga CF in Segunda División (Spain). The match was played on 1 April 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
FC Andorra: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Málaga CF: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Andorra scores 1.28 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Málaga CF scores 1.63 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Andorra 66%, Málaga CF 56%. Over 2.5: FC Andorra 53%, Málaga CF 59%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Málaga CF has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.56. FC Andorra: 14.1 shots per match, Málaga CF: 13.6.
Match halves
FC Andorra: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Málaga CF: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
FC Andorra: 76-90+ (13 goals). Málaga CF: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Segunda División: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Málaga is the match favorite: they sit 4th in the table versus FC Andorra’s 13th and have 16 wins this season compared to Andorra’s 11, with 52 goals scored versus 41. Although Andorra dominates possession and creates more chances at home — averaging 63% possession, 15 shots per match and xG 1.66 — they convert less efficiently, scoring only 1.07 goals per match with a shot conversion rate of 7%. Málaga on the road averages 11.73 shots per match with a higher conversion rate of 10%, translating to 1.13 away goals on average and an overall tally of 52 goals this season; in their last 5 matches the visitors have 3 wins and 2 draws (averaging 2.2 points per match). Defensively Andorra conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches versus Málaga’s 6 in the same period, but across the season Málaga has fewer goals conceded (37 vs 42). Considering the higher league position, better finishing efficiency (10% vs 7%) and recent form stability, I tip an away win and assign them the higher probability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes at 64% versus 36% for No, because the data favors both teams scoring. FC Andorra posts a seasonal BTTS of 65%, averages 2.06 goals scored per match (xG 1.78) and records 6.71 SOT while conceding only 1.12 on average, which strongly supports goal exchanges. Málaga has a seasonal BTTS of 47% and fails to score in 27% of matches, averages 1.13 goals (xG 1.35) and only 3.87 SOT, so their scoring capability is weaker but not impossible. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 40% of cases, with Málaga averaging 2.4 goals in that period and Andorra conceding just 0.6, giving mixed signals. Considering the home attacking advantage (xG 1.78 and 6.71 SOT vs 1.35 and 3.87), Andorra’s high over 2.5 rate of 65% and a league BTTS of 55%, the balance points toward a Both Teams To Score scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast is based on xG and seasonal indicators: home xG 1.78 and Málaga’s defense conceding 1.53 xG suggest approximately 1.66 goals for FC Andorra, while Málaga’s xG 1.35 against Andorra’s defense conceding 1.35 yields 1.35 goals for the visitors (total ≈ 3.01). Seasonal percentages show Andorra has 76% of matches over 1.5 goals and Málaga 67%, with over 0.5 occurring in 94% and 100% of their games respectively — a strong signal for at least 2 goals. Additionally, Andorra averages 15.29 shots and 6.71 on target (conversion rate 13%), while Málaga averages 11.73 shots and 3.87 on target (conversion rate 10%), which increases the probability of home goals. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 10 and 12 goals respectively while conceding 3 and 6, supporting an over 2.5 scenario (~58% probability), though the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (~80%), therefore I recommend the over on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FC Andorra holds a clear statistical advantage: they average 2.06 goals per match versus Málaga’s 1.13, and collect 2.12 points per home match against the visitors’ 1.27 points per away match. Andorra led at the break in 10 fixtures (59% of their matches) and average 1.00 first-half goals while conceding 0.35, whereas Málaga average 0.47 scored and 0.47 conceded by half-time. The difference in chance creation is evident: the home side’s xG is 1.78 versus Málaga’s 1.35, and first-half shots on target average 6.71 for the hosts versus 3.87 for Málaga (the hosts have roughly 73% more shots on target). The hosts have scored 10 goals in minutes 31–45 versus 3 for the visitors and feature in 71% of matches with at least one first-half goal, while the share of matches where both teams score in the first half is only 24% for Andorra and 13% for Málaga; all of this indicates the home team often opens the scoring and maintains the lead. Consequently the most likely scenario is Andorra leading at the break and ultimately winning the match, so I select HT/FT 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Andorra | Málaga CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Málaga CF is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - FC Andorra · 2.2 pts / match - Málaga CF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Málaga CF is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.28 goals / match - FC Andorra · 1.63 goals / match - Málaga CF
Málaga CF is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - FC Andorra · 1.16 goals / match - Málaga CF
FC Andorra scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Málaga CF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).
Málaga CF scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while FC Andorra keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Andorra
Over / Under - Málaga CF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Málaga CF is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - FC Andorra · 1.66 pts / match - Málaga CF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Andorra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Málaga CF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Andorra
Málaga CF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| FC Andorra | Liga | Málaga CF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.59 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 66% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 49% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | • 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 68% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 74% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FC Andorra 0 - 0 - 1 Málaga CF. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Andorra vs Málaga CF?
The Segunda División match finished FC Andorra 3:3 Málaga CF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Andorra vs Málaga CF?
FC Andorra score 1.28 goals per game on average and Málaga CF 1.63. The Segunda División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 66% of FC Andorra's matches and 56% of Málaga CF's.
What form are FC Andorra and Málaga CF in?
Over the last 5 games FC Andorra have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Málaga CF 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Andorra vs Málaga CF?
The statistical background for FC Andorra vs Málaga CF — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


