FC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys: match statistics
FC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Cajamarca played Sport Boys in Primera División (Peru). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
FC Cajamarca: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sport Boys: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Cajamarca scores 1.08 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Sport Boys scores 0.92 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Cajamarca 50%, Sport Boys 42%. Over 2.5: FC Cajamarca 50%, Sport Boys 42%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Sport Boys has higher xG: 1.25 vs 0.98. FC Cajamarca: 8.8 shots per match, Sport Boys: 12.3.
Match halves
FC Cajamarca: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Sport Boys: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
FC Cajamarca: 76-90+ (6 goals). Sport Boys: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Cajamarca has the advantage in chance quality and finishing: at home they average 1.8 goals with 3.8 shots on target and a conversion rate of 18%, while Sport Boys on the road average 0.67 goals with 3.0 shots on target and roughly 7% conversion. However, recent form favors the visitors — FC Cajamarca has scored only 3 goals and averaged 0.2 points per match in the last 5 fixtures, conceding 9 goals, whereas Sport Boys scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per match over the same period. Defensively both teams are very similar: the hosts concede 1.8 goals on average at home, and Sport Boys concede 1.83 goals away, which together with the higher overall goals average in the hosts’ matches (3.6 vs 2.5) points to a game with more goals. FC Cajamarca’s key edge is superior chance construction efficiency (1.8 vs 0.67 goals per match and 3.8 vs 3.0 shots on target), while Sport Boys’ main strength is a better return over the last five matches (8 goals and 1.4 points per match). Taking all this into account, I give a slight edge to the home side — 55% for an FC Cajamarca win, 25% for a draw and 20% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I give the edge to the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario (65% vs 35%) because recent form and goal threat metrics favor both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Cajamarca conceded on average 1.8 goals (9 conceded), while Sport Boys scored 8 goals in those 5 fixtures (1.6 per game), increasing the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome. Seasonally the hosts score 1.17 goals at home and have 50% clean sheets, whereas the visitors score 0.67 away and have only 17% clean sheets; seasonal BTTS is 50% (Cajamarca) vs 33% (Sport Boys). xG also supports the both-teams-to-score version — Cajamarca has xG_for 1.47 and xG_against 1.11, and Sport Boys xG_for 1.03 and xG_against 1.57, while in the last 5 rounds opponents generated on average around 2.1 xG per game against Cajamarca. Considering the league BTTS rate of 56% and the recent vulnerability of the hosts, the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario looks strongest.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects about 2.59 goals in the match: FC Cajamarca ~1.52 (average of xG_for_home 1.47 and xG_against_away 1.57) vs Sport Boys ~1.07 (average of xG_for_away 1.03 and xG_against_home 1.11). Season-long metrics support Over 1.5 — home team has 67% of home matches over 1.5, away team 50%, and specifically 83% of Cajamarca’s matches and 100% of Sport Boys’ away games have ended with at least one goal. The 2.5 line is balanced: the sum of both teams’ xG_for is 1.47+1.03=2.50, but incorporating opposing xG yields a 2.59 forecast, and in the last 5 matches both teams recorded 60% of games over 2.5, hence I rate Over 2.5 at slightly above 50%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (approx. 18%), as season shares of Over 3.5 are only 17% for Cajamarca and 33% for Sport Boys, and the predicted xG is well below 3.5. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5, since the projected 2.59 goals along with season and last-5 Over1.5 rates (67% home, 50% away) give a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics show FC Cajamarca's advantage in attack: home xG is 1.47 versus 1.03 for the visitors, average shots on target 4.17 vs 3.0 and average goals 1.17 vs 0.67, which translates into greater scoring potential for the hosts. At Half-Time the hosts lead in 17% of matches, draw in 50% and trail in 33%, with average goals scored by half 0.33 vs 0.17 for the visitors, so the most likely state at 45 minutes is a draw. After the break FC Cajamarca clearly accelerates — they scored 4 goals in minutes 46–60 and average 0.83 goals in the second half while conceding 0.17 on average; additionally their average points in second halves is 2.33 versus 0.83 for the away side, which increases the chance of a turnaround. The visitors are relatively weak defensively — xG against them is 1.57, they concede on average 1.83 goals per match season-wide and collect only 0.5 points away versus 1.5 points at home, so they are vulnerable to conceding goals after the break. As a result the most likely and strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win Full-Time (X/1), to which I assign the highest probability (28%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Cajamarca | Sport Boys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sport Boys is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - FC Cajamarca · 1.4 pts / match - Sport Boys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cajamarca is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - FC Cajamarca · 0.92 goals / match - Sport Boys
Sport Boys is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.83 goals / match - FC Cajamarca · 1.33 goals / match - Sport Boys
FC Cajamarca scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Sport Boys keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
Sport Boys scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while FC Cajamarca keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Cajamarca
Over / Under - Sport Boys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Cajamarca is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - FC Cajamarca · 0.67 pts / match - Sport Boys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Cajamarca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sport Boys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Cajamarca
Sport Boys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| FC Cajamarca | Liga | Sport Boys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FC CajamarcaSubstitutionOn: Pablo Damián Lavandeira HernándezOff: Brandon Roberto Palacios Bustamante
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
The Primera División match finished FC Cajamarca 3:2 Sport Boys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
FC Cajamarca score 1.08 goals per game on average and Sport Boys 0.92. The Primera División average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FC Cajamarca's matches and 42% of Sport Boys's.
What form are FC Cajamarca and Sport Boys in?
Over the last 5 games FC Cajamarca have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sport Boys 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


