Romania - Liga IIStadionul AreniData current as of 13 September 2026

FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: match statistics

FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cetatea Suceava played CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Stadionul Areni. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

FC Cetatea Suceava: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cetatea Suceava scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores 1.17 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cetatea Suceava 67%, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 67%. Over 2.5: FC Cetatea Suceava 50%, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cetatea Suceava has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.27. FC Cetatea Suceava: 14.8 shots per match, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 9.7.

Match halves

FC Cetatea Suceava: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

FC Cetatea Suceava: 46-60 (5 goals). CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea have an excellent away record: they have won both of their matches on the road so far, averaging 1.50 goals scored and conceding just 0.50 per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away fixtures, while FC Cetatea Suceava concede an average of 1.33 goals at home. The hosts create more chances, as reflected by their xG of 1.59 compared with the visitors’ 0.99, as well as 12.67 shots per match. However, their conversion rate is only 11%, compared with 23% for the Râmnicu Vâlcea side. Cetatea’s form is weaker, having collected 4 points and lost 3 times in their last five matches, while their opponents have earned 5 points. The visitors’ defensive edge, perfect away record to date and greater efficiency in front of goal point towards a narrow win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS scenario is slightly more likely, as the hosts have recorded both teams scoring in 75% of their matches, while both sides have reached 60% over their last five games. Cetatea have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.5 goals per match, which supports a goal for the visitors, who score an average of 1.5 goals per game this season. The hosts should also create chances, averaging 4.5 shots on target compared with just 2.5 for Râmnicu Vâlcea, while their average xG stands at 1.41. The main risk to the pick is the visitors’ defence, which keeps a clean sheet in 50% of matches and concedes an average of just 0.5 goals; however, their last five games have produced 1.2 goals conceded per match. Overall, both teams’ metrics are close to the league BTTS rate of 62%, which is why the selection is BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 2.50-goal projection is based on the home side creating an average of 1.41 xG, with the visitors’ defence allowing 1.36 xG, while Râmnicu Vâlcea’s attack produces 0.99 xG against the home team’s 1.27 xG. In their last five matches, both teams went over 2.5 goals in only 40% of cases, although their matches averaged 2.8 and 2.2 goals respectively. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches and was never involved in a game with at least 4 goals, while this occurred in just 25% of Cetatea’s matches. Additionally, neither team averages more than 0.5 goals after half-time, limiting the risk of a late high-scoring outcome. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the data points to a realistic chance of two or three goals, but a significantly lower probability of four.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea have a significantly stronger season record: they have won 100% of their matches and average 3.0 points per game, while Cetatea Suceava have yet to win and average only 0.5 points. The visitors concede just 0.5 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, whereas the hosts concede an average of 1.5 goals and have not yet kept a clean sheet. Before the break, Vâlcea score an average of 1.0 goals and have conceded none, while Suceava concede 0.75 goals in this period, reinforcing the scenario of the visitors taking the lead at the break. After half-time, the hosts score only 0.25 goals while conceding 0.75, whereas the visitors have averages of 0.5 scored and 0.5 conceded. Therefore, the most likely outcome is for Vâlcea to maintain their lead until full-time, making the HT/FT pick 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
17Shots11
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
8Shots on target3
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
2.07xG1.37
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
4Corners3
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
59Dangerous attacks63
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
-1Fouls-1
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
-1Cards-1
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Goals scored / match1.17
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Goals conceded / match1.17
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
51%Average possession49%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
5Shots on target / match3.83
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.83Shots per match9.67
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
5Shots on target3.83
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10.1%Shot conversion12.1%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
51%Possession49%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.7xG for1.27
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.22xG against1.29
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Shooting quality

FC Cetatea Suceava: AttackingCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: Balanced
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cetatea Suceava is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.4 pts / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

FC Cetatea Suceava
WWLDD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
WLDWL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cetatea Suceava is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.17 goals / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.17 goals / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

FC Cetatea Suceava scoring profile: very strong

FC Cetatea Suceava scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scoring profile: very strong

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while FC Cetatea Suceava keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

9Goals scored (season)7
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
9Goals conceded (season)7
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
3Average goals in match2.33
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
8Goals scored (last 5)6
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%2 goals33%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%3 goals0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%2 goals33%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
33%3 goals0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
FC Cetatea Suceava - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 6 matches
67%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 6 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
33%Scored in both halves0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
60%BTTS - last 560%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FC Cetatea Suceava · 1.83 pts / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

FC Cetatea Suceava - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.83
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.83
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.33
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%No goal before half-time50%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

After half-time (2nd half)

2.17Points per match (2nd half)1
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%Clean sheet after half-time33%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
17%No goal after half-time67%
FC Cetatea SuceavaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

FC Cetatea Suceava - second-half results

67% W17% D17% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cetatea Suceava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cetatea Suceava
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
5
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cetatea Suceava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

FC Cetatea SuceavaLigaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Average goals in match 3.002.89 2.33
Both teams scored 67%62% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%58% 50%
Clean sheets 33%21% 17%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC Cetatea SuceavaGoalAlexandru Aftanache
  2. FC Cetatea SuceavaGoalVadim Kyrycsenko

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

The Liga II match finished FC Cetatea Suceava 4:0 CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

FC Cetatea Suceava score 1.50 goals per game on average and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1.17. The Liga II average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FC Cetatea Suceava's matches and 67% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's.

What form are FC Cetatea Suceava and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cetatea Suceava have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cetatea Suceava vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.