FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II: match statistics
FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Cincinnati II played Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Venue: Northern Kentucky University Stadium. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
FC Cincinnati II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Cincinnati II scores 0.86 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 1.00 and concedes 2.69. League average: 3.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Cincinnati II 36%, Inter Miami II 69%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati II 57%, Inter Miami II 69%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Inter Miami II has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.24. FC Cincinnati II: 9.8 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 10.8.
Match halves
FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.64. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
FC Cincinnati II: 46-60 (3 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I recommend a home win — FC Cincinnati II have a clear defensive edge at home: they concede an average of 1.29 goals per home match, while Inter Miami II concede 3.00 on the road. Both teams are in poor form: Cincinnati have scored only 1 goal and lost all 5 of their last matches, conceding 11, while the visitors have scored 4 and conceded 14 in the same period. Shooting efficiency favors the hosts — their conversion rate is 14% at home versus Inter’s 10% on the road — and they record 29% clean sheets at home compared to 0% for the visitors. xG comparison confirms the hosts’ advantage in chance quality: FC Cincinnati II generate an average home xG of 1.27 with xG against 1.76, while Inter have away xG 1.37 with xG against 2.00, suggesting the hosts create easier chances. Given the better home defensive profile and Inter’s very poor away results, I expect a narrow home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams display high season BTTS rates: FC Cincinnati II 67% and Inter Miami II 71%, versus a league average of 62%, indicating frequent Goal/Goal outcomes. Both sides concede heavily — averaging 2.33 (home) and 3.00 (away) goals per game — and Inter Miami II has 0% clean sheets this season, so a clean sheet expected is unlikely. Offensively they create similar chances: xG 1.31 for FC Cincinnati II vs xG 1.37 for Inter Miami II, while xG against is 1.82 and 2.00, suggesting both teams both generate and allow chances; shots on target 5.0 vs 4.57 further confirm attacking activity. Last 5 matches show divergence (last 5 BTTS: home 20% vs away 80%, recent goals home 1.0/11.0, away 4.0/14.0), but the dominant season-long BTTS trend and high goals conceded favor a bet on BTTS - Yes, hence recommendation YES (75%) vs NO (25%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.66 goals for FC Cincinnati II and 1.60 for Inter Miami II, total 3.26; I calculated these values as the average of home attack xG (1.31) and away conceded xG (2.00), and the average of away attack xG (1.37) and home conceded xG (1.82). Season data show Over 1.5 landed in 83% of FC Cincinnati II matches and 100% of Inter Miami II matches (approximately 92% combined), which provides the strongest signal for Over 1.5. The 2.5 line has moderate support: Over 2.5 occurred in 50% of home matches and 86% of away matches (average 68%), and the sum of expected goals 3.26 vs. the league average 3.24 leads me to raise the probability to 72% for Over 2.5. For the 3.5 line we have 33%/57% (home/away = average 45%), and because the expected total 3.26 is below 3.5 I assign 36% to Over and 64% to Under. Additionally, the high share of matches with both teams scoring (67% home, 71% away), plus average goals conceded 2.33 (home) and 3.00 (away), confirm that at least 2 goals in the match is more likely, hence the recommendation to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at Half-Time, because both teams score little in the first half: FC Cincinnati II average 0.33 first-half goals, Inter Miami II 0.71, and the probability of the home side leading is only 17% versus 29% for the visitors, which implies roughly a 54% chance of a draw at the break. In the second half I see an advantage for the visitors — Inter Miami II has an xG of 1.37 versus 1.31 for FC Cincinnati II, and seasonal average goals of 1.14 vs 0.83, giving the visitors a slight offensive edge. Additionally, most goals come after the break: second-half average goals are 1.83 for the hosts and 2.29 for the visitors, and the proportion of matches with a goal after half-time is 83% and 100%, so matches are often decided in the second half. The hosts have lower efficiency (shot conversion 8% versus 10% for the visitors) and only 17% clean sheets this season, so it is harder for them to hold a lead. Therefore my strongest signal is Half-Time draw and Full-Time victory for the visitors (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Cincinnati II | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Inter Miami II is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
0.86 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1 goals / match - Inter Miami II
FC Cincinnati II is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.93 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II · 2.69 goals / match - Inter Miami II
FC Cincinnati II scores in 50% of matches (7 of 14 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
Inter Miami II scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Cincinnati II
Over / Under - Inter Miami II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter Miami II is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.57 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II · 1 pts / match - Inter Miami II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Cincinnati II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Cincinnati II
Inter Miami II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| FC Cincinnati II | Liga | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.79 | 3.26 | ▲ 3.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 66% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati II 1 - 0 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished FC Cincinnati II 1:0 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II?
FC Cincinnati II score 0.86 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 1.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 36% of FC Cincinnati II's matches and 69% of Inter Miami II's.
What form are FC Cincinnati II and Inter Miami II in?
Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati II have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Inter Miami II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II?
The statistical background for FC Cincinnati II vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


