United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
6 : 2half-time 2:1
Orlando City crest
Orlando City

FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 6:2.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Orlando City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.14 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Orlando City scores 1.50 and concedes 2.71. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 71%, Orlando City 64%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 64%, Orlando City 71%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.22. FC Cincinnati: 13.1 shots per match, Orlando City: 10.6.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.21. Orlando City: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (11 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is FC Cincinnati: at home they score an average of 2.33 goals per game and win 50% of home matches, while Orlando City averages 1.00 goal on the road and wins only 14% of away fixtures. Cincinnati’s attack generates more opportunities: on average 14.67 shots and 5 on target per game with a 16% conversion rate, versus 8.43 shots, 3.71 on target and 12% conversion for Orlando; the home side’s average xG in home matches is 1.55 compared to 1.04 xG for the visitors away. Orlando’s defense on the road is vulnerable to conceding — they concede an average of 3.57 goals away, have 0% clean sheets and an average xG against of 2.10, while Cincinnati concedes 2.00 goals at home and records 33% clean sheets. Both teams scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches, but Orlando has a better points return in that run (2.0 points per game with 3 wins) versus Cincinnati (1.6 points per game). Considering the home advantage in chance creation and conversion (14.67 vs 8.43 shots, 5 vs 3.71 on target, 16% vs 12%) and the visitors’ poor defensive form away (3.57 goals conceded, 57% matches without scoring, 71% away defeats), I assign higher probability to the hosts to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because FC Cincinnati has a season-long home BTTS rate of 86%, and although Orlando has 43% on the road, both teams have produced BTTS in 80% of their last 5 meetings. Cincinnati averages 2.0 goals per game (xG 1.4), averaging 12.71 shots with 5.0 on target, while Orlando concedes 3.57 goals per game with xG against of 2.1, indicating the hosts will create chances and the opponent routinely leaks them. In the last 5 matches both sides have scored 13 goals each (2.6 per game) and conceded on average 2.4 (Cincinnati) and 2.0 (Orlando), meaning both teams’ games have been highly goal-laden recently. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets this season and the league average BTTS is 61%, so the Both Teams To Score signal is stronger and I assign an 80% probability to Yes versus 20% to No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Cincinnati at home scores on average 2.0 goals per game (xG 1.40) and concedes 1.86, while Orlando City away averages 1.0 goals scored (xG 1.04) and concedes as many as 3.57. Combining attackers' xG and opponent defensive xG yields: home side (1.40+2.10)/2 = 1.75 xG, visitors (1.04+2.08)/2 = 1.56 xG, totaling 3.31 expected goals. Season-long indicators confirm a propensity for goals: Over 1.5 occurred in 86% of Cincinnati’s matches and 100% of Orlando’s, while Over 2.5 stands at 71% for both teams. In the last 5 matches each side scored 13 goals (2.6 per game on average), and Cincinnati has an 80% Over 2.5 rate in those five fixtures, which further supports a contest with at least 2–3 goals. Based on this, I recommend staking Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (high probability 95%) and maintain Over 2.5 as a likely direction (75%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back FC Cincinnati to lead at the break and win the match (1/1). Hosts led at half in 4 of 7 games (57%), showing first-half dominance. At half Cincinnati averages 1.14 goals while Orlando City averages only 0.29 and concedes on average 2.0 goals before the break, giving the hosts a clear first-half edge. Over 90 minutes the hosts score 2.0 goals on average with xG 1.4, 5.0 shots on target and a 16% conversion rate, whereas Orlando posts xG 1.04, 3.71 shots on target and a 12% conversion, and concede 3.57 goals per match; these metrics support a home victory. Additionally, Cincinnati’s home matches feature both teams scoring in 86% of cases, indicating offensive activity on both sides, but the hosts’ superior attacking quality and efficiency suggest they will retain the lead. Based on these figures I rate the 1/1 scenario as the strongest (34% probability), with alternatives 1/X (17%) and X/1 (12%) considered secondary.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
21Shots19
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
11Shots on target9
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
2.39xG2.24
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
6Corners9
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
41Dangerous attacks58
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
17Fouls13
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
2Cards3
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiOrlando City
2.14Goals scored / match1.5
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
2.5Goals conceded / match2.71
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
49%Average possession45%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
5.29Shots on target / match4.36
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.07Shots per match10.57
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
5.29Shots on target4.36
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
16.4%Shot conversion14.2%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
49%Possession45%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1.48xG for1.22
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1.82xG against2.09
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingOrlando City: Counter-attacking
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.4 pts / match - Orlando City

FC Cincinnati
WWDLD
Season result split
29% W36% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-5
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 2.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Orlando City
LWLWD
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 2.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

2.14 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.5 goals / match - Orlando City

FC Cincinnati is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 2.71 goals / match - Orlando City

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 14 matches).

Orlando City scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

30Goals scored (season)21
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
35Goals conceded (season)38
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
4.64Average goals in match4.21
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
13Goals scored (last 5)11
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
12Goals conceded (last 5)12
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal64%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
71%2 goals43%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
43%3 goals21%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
14%4 goals21%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal100%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
64%2 goals64%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
50%3 goals50%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
29%4 goals29%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

57%BTTS at half-time21%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
43%BTTS in both halves0%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
50%Scored in both halves21%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
80%BTTS - last 580%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
71%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time43%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Orlando City is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.29 pts / match - Orlando City

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
36% leading21% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.29
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.71
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.29
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1.93Average goals (1st half)2
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
43%Clean sheet before half-time43%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
29%No goal before half-time50%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.79
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.43
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
2.71Average goals (2nd half)2.21
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
21%Clean sheet after half-time29%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City
36%No goal after half-time64%
FC CincinnatiOrlando City

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
14
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Orlando City - second-half results

21% W14% R64% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match2.42.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 8
Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.63.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
9
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
3
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
7
7
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
136%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
187%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaOrlando City
Average goals in match 4.643.25 4.21
Both teams scored 71%60% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%62% 71%
Clean sheets 14%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 71%77% 86%
Goal after half-time 93%81% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityYellow cardAdrián Marín Gómez
  2. Orlando CityGoalMartín Exequiel Ojeda
  3. FC CincinnatiYellow cardGerardo Valenzuela
  4. Orlando CityYellow cardTiago Souza de Jesus Carvalho
  5. FC CincinnatiGoalEvander da Silva FerreiraAssist: Pavel Bucha
  6. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Tyrese SpicerOff: Tiago Souza de Jesus Carvalho
  7. FC CincinnatiYellow cardMatt Miazga
  8. Orlando CityGoalMartín Exequiel Ojeda
  9. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Marco PasalicOff: Justin Ellis
  10. FC CincinnatiGoalEvander da Silva FerreiraAssist: Matt Miazga
  11. Orlando CityYellow cardDavid Brekalo
  12. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Brian AnungaOff: Obinna Nwobodo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Rubiel VazquezMatches officiated: 10
4.4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins20%Draws30%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 6:2 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City?

FC Cincinnati score 2.14 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.50. The MLS average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 71% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 64% of Orlando City's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Orlando City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FC Cincinnati vs Orlando City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.