United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders: match statistics

FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati played Seattle Sounders in MLS (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Seattle Sounders: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 and concedes 2.30 goals per match. Seattle Sounders scores 1.11 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 80%, Seattle Sounders 53%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 70%, Seattle Sounders 42%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.55. FC Cincinnati: 13.7 shots per match, Seattle Sounders: 13.1.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.30. Seattle Sounders: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (17 goals). Seattle Sounders: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati are significantly stronger at home, winning 67% of their matches and averaging 3.11 goals per game, while Seattle score just 0.70 goals away from home. The hosts average 15.78 shots, including 6.44 on target, compared with the visitors’ 11.4 attempts and 3.9 shots on target, while their conversion rate stands at an impressive 20%, compared with just 6% for Seattle. Cincinnati have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that span, whereas the Sounders have lost 4 of their last 5 games, scoring only 5 goals. The hosts concede an average of 2.11 goals at home, so Seattle may be able to exploit the spaces, but their 30% of away matches without scoring limits their chances of an upset. Cincinnati’s superiority in chance creation, supported by an xG of 1.72 compared with Seattle’s 1.38 away from home, points to a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

FC Cincinnati have strong foundations for scoring: they average 1.63 goals, rising to 2.20 across their last 5 matches, with an xG of 1.67. During this period, Seattle conceded an average of 1.80 goals, while their average xG conceded increased to a very high 2.51, so the hosts should create plenty of chances. The signal is less clear for the visitors, as they score only 0.70 goals per game this season and failed to score in 30% of their matches. However, Cincinnati have kept a clean sheet in just 13% of their games and concede an average of 1.75 goals, meaning Seattle should be able to exploit the hosts’ defensive gaps. BTTS - Yes occurred in 80% of Cincinnati’s last five matches, compared with the league average of 62%, so the scenario of both teams scoring holds a moderate edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Cincinnati have averaged 2.2 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Seattle have conceded 1.8 goals per game during this period, with an exceptionally high xG against them of 2.51. The hosts are also creating chances consistently: their average xG stands at 1.70, with 14.5 shots and 5.63 shots on target per match, while Seattle’s defence allows an average of 1.63 xG. Seattle score just 0.70 goals per game this season, but their poor finishing does not rule out a goal against a Cincinnati defence that concedes 1.75 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in just 13% of matches. The 1.5 line has the strongest coverage: at least 2 goals were scored in all of Cincinnati’s matches and in 40% of Seattle’s games, while the current form of both teams further raises the projection to 2.95 goals. Over 2.5 is also possible, but Seattle’s season profile—with 70% of matches finishing below this line—makes Over 1.5 clearly the safer choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FC Cincinnati are in clearly better form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.2 goals and conceding just 1.2, while Seattle have lost 4 of their last 5 games, conceding an average of 1.8 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 4 of their last 5 appearances, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before half-time and allowing their opponents just 0.4. Seattle score only 0.7 goals per away match on average, while their shot conversion rate stands at 6%, compared with 11% for Cincinnati. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG is 1.70, while Seattle’s opponents average 1.63 xG. The scenario of Cincinnati leading at half-time and maintaining their winning position is therefore the strongest-supported HT/FT outcome, backed by both their current form and their attacking superiority.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
17Shots10
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
9Shots on target3
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
2.04xG1
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
9Corners4
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
47Dangerous attacks23
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
7Fouls14
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1Cards2
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
2.4Goals scored / match1.11
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
2.3Goals conceded / match1.37
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
50%Average possession52%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
5.8Shots on target / match4.79
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.7Shots per match13.11
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
5.8Shots on target4.79
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
17.5%Shot conversion8.4%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
50%Possession52%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.56xG for1.55
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.82xG against1.57
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingSeattle Sounders: Balanced
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati
WLWDW
Season result split
40% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Seattle Sounders
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
37% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-9
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 116% better for: goals scored per match.

2.4 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.11 goals / match - Seattle Sounders

Seattle Sounders is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.3 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.37 goals / match - Seattle Sounders

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Seattle Sounders keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Seattle Sounders scoring profile: very strong

Seattle Sounders scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

48Goals scored (season)21
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
46Goals conceded (season)26
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
4.7Average goals in match2.47
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
12Goals scored (last 5)3
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal74%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
70%2 goals21%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
45%3 goals11%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
25%4 goals5%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal74%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
65%2 goals42%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
40%3 goals11%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
20%4 goals5%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
Seattle Sounders - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 19 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

65%BTTS at half-time26%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
45%BTTS in both halves5%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
55%Scored in both halves16%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
100%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.16 pts / match - Seattle Sounders

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Seattle Sounders - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.16
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.1Goals scored (1st half)0.53
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
2.15Average goals (1st half)1.05
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
35%Clean sheet before half-time47%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
20%No goal before half-time58%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.26
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
2.55Average goals (2nd half)1.42
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
25%Clean sheet after half-time47%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders
35%No goal after half-time53%
FC CincinnatiSeattle Sounders

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

40% W25% R35% P
25
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seattle Sounders - second-half results

32% W32% R37% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 7
Seattle Sounders - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
10
16-30
13
8
31-45
6
11
46-60
3
4
61-75
17
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Seattle Sounders
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
169%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Seattle Sounders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaSeattle Sounders
Average goals in match 4.703.19 2.47
Both teams scored 80%62% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%61% 42%
Clean sheets 10%21% 26%
Goal before half-time 80%76% 68%
Goal after half-time 90%81% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiGoalEvander da Silva Ferreira
  2. Seattle SoundersYellow cardRyan Sailor
  3. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Ahoueke DenkeyOff: Kenji Mboma Dem
  4. FC CincinnatiYellow cardBryan Josías Ramírez León
  5. Seattle SoundersYellow cardPeter Kingston
  6. Seattle SoundersGoalKalani Kossa-RienziAssist: Albert Rusnák
  7. Seattle SoundersSubstitutionOn: Ki-Hee KimOff: Sebastian Gomez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 1:1 Seattle Sounders. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?

FC Cincinnati score 2.40 goals per game on average and Seattle Sounders 1.11. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 80% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 53% of Seattle Sounders's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Seattle Sounders in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Seattle Sounders 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?

The statistical background for FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.