United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Toronto: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Toronto crest
Toronto
165%(1.79)
X20%(3.61)
215%(4.20)

FC Cincinnati displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 100% of their home matches this season with an average score of 2:0. The hosts boast excellent defensive efficiency, keeping a clean sheet in all home games, while Toronto has failed to win any away match and concedes an average of 3 goals per game. The visitors' form is alarming – a streak of two consecutive away defeats and only 0.8 points per match in their last five outings. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.23 vs 1.06), and the difference in possession (54% vs 48%) and shot accuracy (18% vs 12%) further confirms FC Cincinnati's dominance. All indicators point to a comfortable victory for the hosts in front of their home crowd.

FC Cincinnati vs Toronto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati play Toronto in MLS (United States). The match date is 9 March 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Toronto: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.50 and concedes 2.50 goals per match. Toronto scores 1.38 and concedes 1.81. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 75%, Toronto 75%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 69%, Toronto 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.34. FC Cincinnati: 13.4 shots per match, Toronto: 11.7.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.38. Toronto: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 1.06.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (13 goals). Toronto: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

FC Cincinnati displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 100% of their home matches this season with an average score of 2:0. The hosts boast excellent defensive efficiency, keeping a clean sheet in all home games, while Toronto has failed to win any away match and concedes an average of 3 goals per game. The visitors' form is alarming – a streak of two consecutive away defeats and only 0.8 points per match in their last five outings. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.23 vs 1.06), and the difference in possession (54% vs 48%) and shot accuracy (18% vs 12%) further confirms FC Cincinnati's dominance. All indicators point to a comfortable victory for the hosts in front of their home crowd.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FC CincinnatiToronto
14Shots11
FC CincinnatiToronto
2Shots on target5
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.17xG1.27
FC CincinnatiToronto
8Corners7
FC CincinnatiToronto
18Dangerous attacks30
FC CincinnatiToronto
14Fouls11
FC CincinnatiToronto
2Cards2
FC CincinnatiToronto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.5Goals scored / match1.38
FC CincinnatiToronto
2.5Goals conceded / match1.81
FC CincinnatiToronto
49%Average possession47%
FC CincinnatiToronto
5.69Shots on target / match4.13
FC CincinnatiToronto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match11.69
FC CincinnatiToronto
5.69Shots on target4.13
FC CincinnatiToronto
18.7%Shot conversion11.8%
FC CincinnatiToronto
49%Possession47%
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.52xG for1.34
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.86xG against1.37
FC CincinnatiToronto

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingToronto: Balanced
FC CincinnatiToronto
Accuracy (shots on target)43%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 0.4 pts / match - Toronto

FC Cincinnati
DLDWW
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-5
1.44 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Toronto
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W44% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 81% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.38 goals / match - Toronto

Toronto is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.5 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.81 goals / match - Toronto

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Toronto scoring profile: very strong

Toronto scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

40Goals scored (season)22
FC CincinnatiToronto
40Goals conceded (season)29
FC CincinnatiToronto
5Average goals in match3.19
FC CincinnatiToronto
18Goals scored (last 5)4
FC CincinnatiToronto
15Goals conceded (last 5)9
FC CincinnatiToronto

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal81%
FC CincinnatiToronto
75%2 goals38%
FC CincinnatiToronto
50%3 goals19%
FC CincinnatiToronto
25%4 goals0%
FC CincinnatiToronto

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal81%
FC CincinnatiToronto
69%2 goals56%
FC CincinnatiToronto
50%3 goals38%
FC CincinnatiToronto
25%4 goals6%
FC CincinnatiToronto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

63%BTTS at half-time25%
FC CincinnatiToronto
50%BTTS in both halves6%
FC CincinnatiToronto
56%Scored in both halves6%
FC CincinnatiToronto

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
FC CincinnatiToronto
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
FC CincinnatiToronto
100%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiToronto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
FC CincinnatiToronto
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
FC CincinnatiToronto
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
FC CincinnatiToronto

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FC CincinnatiToronto
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiToronto
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
FC CincinnatiToronto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 0.69 pts / match - Toronto

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Toronto - half-time state
6% leading50% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)0.69
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.13Goals scored (1st half)0.31
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
FC CincinnatiToronto
2.19Average goals (1st half)1.13
FC CincinnatiToronto
38%Clean sheet before half-time44%
FC CincinnatiToronto
25%No goal before half-time69%
FC CincinnatiToronto

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.31
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.38Goals scored (2nd half)1.06
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.44Goals conceded (2nd half)1
FC CincinnatiToronto
2.81Average goals (2nd half)2.06
FC CincinnatiToronto
19%Clean sheet after half-time38%
FC CincinnatiToronto
31%No goal after half-time44%
FC CincinnatiToronto

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

38% W25% R38% P
20
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding317%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.81.8
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match2.83.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 9
Toronto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
8
16-30
12
6
31-45
6
9
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Toronto
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.98
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Toronto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaToronto
Average goals in match 5.003.31 3.19
Both teams scored 75%61% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%63% 63%
Clean sheets 13%22% 19%
Goal before half-time 75%77% 63%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati 0 - 1 - 0 Toronto. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 0:1 Toronto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

FC Cincinnati score 2.50 goals per game on average and Toronto 1.38. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 75% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 75% of Toronto's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Toronto in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Toronto 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.