United States - MLSToyota StadiumData current as of 13 September 2026

FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

FC Dallas crest
FC Dallas
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers

FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Dallas played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

FC Dallas: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Portland Timbers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Dallas scores 1.96 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.92 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Dallas 67%, Portland Timbers 79%. Over 2.5: FC Dallas 71%, Portland Timbers 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.38. FC Dallas: 12.2 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 13.0.

Match halves

FC Dallas: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.92. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

FC Dallas: 76-90+ (13 goals). Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Dallas have a clearly stronger home profile, averaging 2.2 goals per match, compared with Portland Timbers’ 1.36 away goals per game. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in that run, while the visitors have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over the same period, with 11 goals scored. Portland have lost as many as 64% of their away matches, have kept no clean sheets and allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.21 xG, which favors Dallas’ attacking efficiency. Dallas also have defensive issues, conceding 1.9 goals per home match and keeping a clean sheet in only 10% of their appearances, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario. The hosts’ superior conversion rate—18% compared with Portland’s 11%—and significantly stronger home results support a Dallas victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is very strong: FC Dallas recorded BTTS in 92% of their matches this season, while Portland did so in 64%, compared with the league average of 63%. In their last five matches, Portland registered BTTS in 100% of cases and Dallas in 80%, with the teams scoring an average of 2.2 and 2.8 goals respectively. Both defenses regularly allow opponents to create chances: Dallas conceded 3.0 goals per match recently, Portland 2.0, while their average xG against stands at 1.83 and 2.02 respectively. Portland have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, while Dallas have done so in only 8% of games, significantly increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. The hosts are particularly dangerous in attack, averaging 2.42 goals and 5.08 shots on target per match, while the visitors should be able to exploit Dallas's defensive weaknesses despite their lower shooting efficiency. This strongly supports the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal market, rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 result or a match in which neither side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: FC Dallas average 2.42 goals scored, while Portland concede 1.91 goals per game. In their last five appearances, Dallas scored 14 and conceded 15 goals, while Portland recorded 11 goals scored and 10 conceded, presenting a very open profile for both teams. At least 2 goals were scored in 100% of the league matches involving each team, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 100% of Dallas’s last five matches and 80% of Portland’s. Additionally, Dallas’s average xG stands at 1.57, compared with 2.21 xG conceded by Portland, meaning the hosts should create a particularly high number of high-quality chances. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as even with a partial regression in finishing efficiency, the expected 3.65 goals provide this line with a very high margin of safety.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FC Dallas has a clearly stronger home record: they win 58% of their matches and score an average of 2.42 goals, while Portland lose as many as 64% of their away games and concede 1.91 goals per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances in the opposition half, with an xG of 1.57 compared with Portland’s 1.41, and average 5.08 shots on target versus 4.09 for the visitors. The signal for Dallas to lead at the break is further strengthened by the fact that Portland were behind at half-time in 55% of their away matches, while the hosts score an average of 1.17 goals before the interval. Dallas are particularly dangerous after the break, scoring an average of 1.25 goals and losing the second half in only 8% of matches, which favours them maintaining or extending their advantage. However, both defences are prone to conceding, so the draw-at-half-time and home-win-at-full-time scenarios remain significant, although the highest-rated outcome is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
FC DallasPortland Timbers
9Shots18
FC DallasPortland Timbers
5Shots on target4
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.11xG1.73
FC DallasPortland Timbers
7Corners5
FC DallasPortland Timbers
27Dangerous attacks45
FC DallasPortland Timbers
13Fouls4
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1Cards0
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.96Goals scored / match1.92
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.71Goals conceded / match1.88
FC DallasPortland Timbers
42%Average possession50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4.75Shots on target / match4.54
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.21Shots per match13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4.75Shots on target4.54
FC DallasPortland Timbers
16%Shot conversion14.7%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
42%Possession50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.38xG for1.5
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.49xG against1.88
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

FC Dallas: Counter-attackingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
FC DallasPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Dallas is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - FC Dallas · 1.6 pts / match - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas
WLDWW
Season result split
46% W29% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Portland Timbers
WDLWD
Season result split
38% W21% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-10
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Dallas is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - FC Dallas · 1.88 goals / match - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas scoring profile: very strong

FC Dallas scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).

47Goals scored (season)46
FC DallasPortland Timbers
41Goals conceded (season)45
FC DallasPortland Timbers
3.67Average goals in match3.79
FC DallasPortland Timbers
13Goals scored (last 5)12
FC DallasPortland Timbers
15Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC DallasPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal83%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
67%2 goals58%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%3 goals21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
17%4 goals13%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal96%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
50%2 goals63%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
29%3 goals21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
4%4 goals8%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

79%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 24 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

46%BTTS at half-time42%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
29%BTTS in both halves8%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
50%Scored in both halves46%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
80%BTTS - last 5100%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
46%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Dallas is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - FC Dallas · 1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers

FC Dallas - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
29% leading25% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.04Goals scored (1st half)0.92
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
FC DallasPortland Timbers
2.04Average goals (1st half)2.04
FC DallasPortland Timbers
46%Clean sheet before half-time21%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%No goal before half-time38%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.58
FC DallasPortland Timbers
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1
FC DallasPortland Timbers
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
FC DallasPortland Timbers
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.75
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FC DallasPortland Timbers
38%No goal after half-time33%
FC DallasPortland Timbers

FC Dallas - second-half results

29% W50% D21% L
33
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

42% W33% D25% L
27
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Dallas - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.81.2
Average goals in match3.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Dallas
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
8
16-30
10
10
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
8
61-75
13
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
10
8
16-30
6
9
31-45
5
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Dallas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC DallasLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 3.673.20 3.79
Both teams scored 67%63% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%62% 75%
Clean sheets 17%21% 4%
Goal before half-time 71%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC DallasGoalLogan FarringtonAssist: Shaquell Moore
  2. FC DallasYellow cardKaick da Silva Ferreira
  3. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Ariel LassiterOff: Julio Joao Ortiz Landázuri
  4. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Gage GuerraOff: Omir Fernandez
  5. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Kamal Anthony MillerOff: Ian Smith
  6. FC DallasSubstitutionOn: Lalas AbubakarOff: Bernard Kamungo
  7. Portland TimbersGoalAriel LassiterAssist: Gage Guerra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Dallas 0 - 1 - 0 Portland Timbers. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished FC Dallas 2:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

FC Dallas score 1.96 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.92. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FC Dallas's matches and 79% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are FC Dallas and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games FC Dallas have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.