FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: match statistics
FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FC Dallas played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
FC Dallas: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Portland Timbers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FC Dallas scores 1.96 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.92 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FC Dallas 67%, Portland Timbers 79%. Over 2.5: FC Dallas 71%, Portland Timbers 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.38. FC Dallas: 12.2 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 13.0.
Match halves
FC Dallas: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.92. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
FC Dallas: 76-90+ (13 goals). Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Dallas have a clearly stronger home profile, averaging 2.2 goals per match, compared with Portland Timbers’ 1.36 away goals per game. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in that run, while the visitors have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over the same period, with 11 goals scored. Portland have lost as many as 64% of their away matches, have kept no clean sheets and allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.21 xG, which favors Dallas’ attacking efficiency. Dallas also have defensive issues, conceding 1.9 goals per home match and keeping a clean sheet in only 10% of their appearances, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario. The hosts’ superior conversion rate—18% compared with Portland’s 11%—and significantly stronger home results support a Dallas victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is very strong: FC Dallas recorded BTTS in 92% of their matches this season, while Portland did so in 64%, compared with the league average of 63%. In their last five matches, Portland registered BTTS in 100% of cases and Dallas in 80%, with the teams scoring an average of 2.2 and 2.8 goals respectively. Both defenses regularly allow opponents to create chances: Dallas conceded 3.0 goals per match recently, Portland 2.0, while their average xG against stands at 1.83 and 2.02 respectively. Portland have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, while Dallas have done so in only 8% of games, significantly increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. The hosts are particularly dangerous in attack, averaging 2.42 goals and 5.08 shots on target per match, while the visitors should be able to exploit Dallas's defensive weaknesses despite their lower shooting efficiency. This strongly supports the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal market, rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 result or a match in which neither side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: FC Dallas average 2.42 goals scored, while Portland concede 1.91 goals per game. In their last five appearances, Dallas scored 14 and conceded 15 goals, while Portland recorded 11 goals scored and 10 conceded, presenting a very open profile for both teams. At least 2 goals were scored in 100% of the league matches involving each team, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 100% of Dallas’s last five matches and 80% of Portland’s. Additionally, Dallas’s average xG stands at 1.57, compared with 2.21 xG conceded by Portland, meaning the hosts should create a particularly high number of high-quality chances. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as even with a partial regression in finishing efficiency, the expected 3.65 goals provide this line with a very high margin of safety.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FC Dallas has a clearly stronger home record: they win 58% of their matches and score an average of 2.42 goals, while Portland lose as many as 64% of their away games and concede 1.91 goals per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances in the opposition half, with an xG of 1.57 compared with Portland’s 1.41, and average 5.08 shots on target versus 4.09 for the visitors. The signal for Dallas to lead at the break is further strengthened by the fact that Portland were behind at half-time in 55% of their away matches, while the hosts score an average of 1.17 goals before the interval. Dallas are particularly dangerous after the break, scoring an average of 1.25 goals and losing the second half in only 8% of matches, which favours them maintaining or extending their advantage. However, both defences are prone to conceding, so the draw-at-half-time and home-win-at-full-time scenarios remain significant, although the highest-rated outcome is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FC Dallas | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Dallas is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - FC Dallas · 1.6 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Dallas is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - FC Dallas · 1.88 goals / match - Portland Timbers
FC Dallas scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 matches).
Portland Timbers scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Dallas
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Dallas is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - FC Dallas · 1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Dallas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FC Dallas
Portland Timbers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| FC Dallas | Liga | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 3.20 | ▲ 3.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FC Dallas 0 - 1 - 0 Portland Timbers. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?
The MLS match finished FC Dallas 2:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?
FC Dallas score 1.96 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.92. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FC Dallas's matches and 79% of Portland Timbers's.
What form are FC Dallas and Portland Timbers in?
Over the last 5 games FC Dallas have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Dallas vs Portland Timbers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


