FCSB vs Petrolul 52: match statistics
FCSB vs Petrolul 52: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FCSB played Petrolul 52 in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
FCSB: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Petrolul 52: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FCSB scores 1.66 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Petrolul 52 scores 0.83 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FCSB 57%, Petrolul 52 43%. Over 2.5: FCSB 54%, Petrolul 52 26%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
FCSB has higher xG: 1.93 vs 1.34. FCSB: 17.7 shots per match, Petrolul 52: 12.5.
Match halves
FCSB: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.74. Petrolul 52: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.51.
Goals by minute
FCSB: 31-45+ (13 goals). Petrolul 52: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FCSB is the favorite for this match: they have scored 58 goals this season, win 50% of home matches and have a positive goal difference of +8. The hosts create significantly more chances — at home they average 18.28 shots (5.94 on target) with 61% possession versus Petrolul’s 10.17 shots (3.39 on target) and 43% possession away. The quality gap is confirmed by xG: FCSB has 1.98 xG at home, while the visitors have only 1.15 xG on the road; the visitors also concede more xG away (1.69 vs 1.15). In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and averaged 2.0 points per game, while Petrolul scored 5 goals (1.0) and averaged 1.4 points per game; additionally the visitors failed to score in 33% of away matches versus 22% for the hosts. Considering the advantage in shots, possession, xG and the clearer home record, I back a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
xG analysis shows FCSB generates 1.54 xG per home match, while Petrolul concedes 1.69 xG away, suggesting the hosts will create genuine scoring chances. FCSB averages 14.88 shots and 3.53 on target per home game versus the visitors' 10.17 shots and 3.39 on target, so FCSB’s offense is clearly more active. Petrolul has a season BTTS rate of 50% and in the last 5 matches produced 1.98 xG, scored 5 goals (1.0 per match) and conceded 5 goals (1.0 per match), showing they can find the net. FCSB in the last 5 matches scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0), although the hosts’ season BTTS rate is only 35% and they concede on average 1.06 goals per match, which moderately reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. In summary, FCSB’s creative advantage (14.88 shots, 1.54 xG) against Petrolul’s weaker defense (1.69 xG against) and the fact both teams concede around 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches leads me to pick BTTS - Yes with a probability of 60% versus 40% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on combining season xG and form from the last 5 matches I estimate total goals around 2.84: 1.50 for FCSB and 1.34 for Petrolul (sum 2.84). Season xG for FCSB is 1.54, and xG against Petrolul is 1.69, giving about 1.62 in one approach; meanwhile the last 5 matches show FCSB xG 1.69 versus xG against Petrolul 1.06 → ~1.38, and averaging these methods yields ~1.50 for the home side. From a Poisson distribution with λ=2.84 the probabilities are: Over 1.5 ≈78%, Over 2.5 ≈54% and Over 3.5 ≈32%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, FCSB averages 14.88 shots with 3.53 on target and scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg) versus Petrolul 10.17 shots and 5 goals (1.0 avg), which supports the at least two-goal scenario, although season percentages for Over 2.5 are low (29% for FCSB, 22% for Petrolul) making the 2.5 line riskier.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a Half-Time draw with a Full-Time home win (X/1). A draw at the break appears most likely — the hosts were level at half-time in 53% of matches and Petrolul in 61%, which in my distribution translates to roughly a 55% chance of a draw after the first 45 minutes (X/1 30% + X/X 18% + X/2 7%). After the break FCSB are the favorites: their average xG is 1.54 versus the visitors’ 1.15, and their xG conceded is 1.16 versus Petrolul’s 1.69, meaning the home side creates more high-quality chances and limits the opponent better. Additionally the hosts perform better after half-time — averaging 1.24 points after the break versus 1.00 for the visitors — and in the last five matches FCSB won 60% of games compared to Petrolul’s 40%; in those five games FCSB scored an average of 1.2 goals before half-time versus Petrolul’s 0.4, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in the second half. For these reasons I rate X/1 (30%) as the strongest signal; 1/1 is assigned 11% as a less likely earlier lead for the hosts, and 2/2 10% as a less likely away win maintained from half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | Petrolul 52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FCSB is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - FCSB · 1.4 pts / match - Petrolul 52
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1.66 goals / match - FCSB · 0.83 goals / match - Petrolul 52
Petrolul 52 is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - FCSB · 1.03 goals / match - Petrolul 52
FCSB scores in 83% of matches (29 of 35 matches), while Petrolul 52 keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 35 matches).
Petrolul 52 scores in 60% of matches (21 of 35 matches), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCSB
Over / Under - Petrolul 52
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FCSB is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - FCSB · 1.09 pts / match - Petrolul 52
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Petrolul 52 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FCSB
Petrolul 52
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | Petrolul 52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.55 | ▼ 1.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 47% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▼ 51% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): FCSB 1 - 1 - 0 Petrolul 52. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 3:1 Petrolul 52. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and Petrolul 52?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCSB won 1, Petrolul 52 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
FCSB score 1.66 goals per game on average and Petrolul 52 0.83. The Liga I average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 57% of FCSB's matches and 43% of Petrolul 52's.
What form are FCSB and Petrolul 52 in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Petrolul 52 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
The statistical background for FCSB vs Petrolul 52 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


