Romania - Liga IData current as of 23 July 2026

FCSB vs UTA Arad: match statistics

FCSB crest
FCSB
1 : 0half-time 0:0
UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
150%(1.50)
X30%(4.10)
220%(4.90)

FCSB demonstrates superior offensive quality in home matches compared to UTA Arad, evidenced by a higher average xG (2.07 vs 1.45) and better chance conversion. The hosts maintain possession dominance (61% vs 45%), allowing them to control the tempo and create more scoring opportunities. UTA Arad shows solid form in their last five matches (1.6 PPG), but their weak away defense (only 7% clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.47 goals) is a serious concern. FCSB wins 44% of their home games and keeps a clean sheet in 38% of them, which, with the support of their fans, gives them a clear advantage. Considering all factors, a home win is expected, although UTA Arad could cause an upset, hence a significant probability of a draw remains.

FCSB vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCSB play UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

FCSB: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. UTA Arad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCSB scores 1.63 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. UTA Arad scores 1.36 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCSB 56%, UTA Arad 56%. Over 2.5: FCSB 54%, UTA Arad 46%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

FCSB has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.54. FCSB: 17.7 shots per match, UTA Arad: 14.0.

Match halves

FCSB: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.76. UTA Arad: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

FCSB: 0-15 (13 goals). UTA Arad: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

FCSB demonstrates superior offensive quality in home matches compared to UTA Arad, evidenced by a higher average xG (2.07 vs 1.45) and better chance conversion. The hosts maintain possession dominance (61% vs 45%), allowing them to control the tempo and create more scoring opportunities. UTA Arad shows solid form in their last five matches (1.6 PPG), but their weak away defense (only 7% clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.47 goals) is a serious concern. FCSB wins 44% of their home games and keeps a clean sheet in 38% of them, which, with the support of their fans, gives them a clear advantage. Considering all factors, a home win is expected, although UTA Arad could cause an upset, hence a significant probability of a draw remains.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
FCSBUTA Arad
13Shots10
FCSBUTA Arad
1Shots on target2
FCSBUTA Arad
1.37xG1.04
FCSBUTA Arad
8Corners3
FCSBUTA Arad
65Dangerous attacks36
FCSBUTA Arad
12Fouls13
FCSBUTA Arad
4Cards2
FCSBUTA Arad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match1.36
FCSBUTA Arad
1.29Goals conceded / match1.31
FCSBUTA Arad
59%Average possession46%
FCSBUTA Arad
6.15Shots on target / match4.46
FCSBUTA Arad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.71Shots per match14.03
FCSBUTA Arad
6.15Shots on target4.46
FCSBUTA Arad
9.2%Shot conversion9.7%
FCSBUTA Arad
59%Possession46%
FCSBUTA Arad
1.94xG for1.54
FCSBUTA Arad
1.18xG against1.5
FCSBUTA Arad

Shooting quality

FCSB: DominantUTA Arad: Attacking
FCSBUTA Arad
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTA Arad is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - FCSB · 1.6 pts / match - UTA Arad

FCSB
LDLWW
Season result split
46% W22% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-9-13
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-5-5
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UTA Arad
LDDWW
Season result split
41% W31% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-11
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCSB is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - FCSB · 1.36 goals / match - UTA Arad

FCSB scoring profile: very strong

FCSB scores in 78% of matches (32 of 41 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).

UTA Arad scoring profile: very strong

UTA Arad scores in 74% of matches (29 of 39 matches), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 41 matches).

67Goals scored (season)53
FCSBUTA Arad
53Goals conceded (season)51
FCSBUTA Arad
2.93Average goals in match2.67
FCSBUTA Arad
6Goals scored (last 5)3
FCSBUTA Arad
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
FCSBUTA Arad

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal74%
FCSBUTA Arad
46%2 goals41%
FCSBUTA Arad
24%3 goals15%
FCSBUTA Arad
15%4 goals3%
FCSBUTA Arad

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal77%
FCSBUTA Arad
37%2 goals33%
FCSBUTA Arad
17%3 goals13%
FCSBUTA Arad
5%4 goals8%
FCSBUTA Arad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time26%
FCSBUTA Arad
10%BTTS in both halves5%
FCSBUTA Arad
34%Scored in both halves31%
FCSBUTA Arad

BTTS and goal count

49%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
FCSBUTA Arad
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
FCSBUTA Arad
40%BTTS - last 520%
FCSBUTA Arad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
FCSBUTA Arad
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
FCSBUTA Arad
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
FCSBUTA Arad

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
FCSBUTA Arad
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
FCSBUTA Arad
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FCSBUTA Arad

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCSB is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.66 pts / match - FCSB · 1.33 pts / match - UTA Arad

FCSB - half-time state
44% leading34% draw22% trailing
UTA Arad - half-time state
28% leading49% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.66Points per match (1st half)1.33
FCSBUTA Arad
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.62
FCSBUTA Arad
0.51Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
FCSBUTA Arad
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.26
FCSBUTA Arad
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
FCSBUTA Arad
39%No goal before half-time49%
FCSBUTA Arad

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.44
FCSBUTA Arad
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
FCSBUTA Arad
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
FCSBUTA Arad
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.41
FCSBUTA Arad
46%Clean sheet after half-time46%
FCSBUTA Arad
49%No goal after half-time46%
FCSBUTA Arad

FCSB - second-half results

27% W46% R27% P
68
Half-time points
36
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding105%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UTA Arad - second-half results

38% W28% R33% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCSB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
UTA Arad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCSB
ScoredConceded
13
2
0-15
10
7
16-30
13
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
11
8
61-75
11
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
7
7
16-30
9
10
31-45
5
8
46-60
8
7
61-75
16
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+79%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCSB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

FCSBLigaUTA Arad
Average goals in match 2.932.53 2.67
Both teams scored 56%51% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%46% 46%
Clean sheets 29%28% 23%
Goal before half-time 73%67% 69%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): FCSB 2 - 0 - 0 UTA Arad. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

AFC UTA Arad
2 : 4
SC Fotbal Club FCSB SA
SC Fotbal Club FCSB SA
4 : 0
AFC UTA Arad

FAQ

What was the result of FCSB vs UTA Arad?

The Liga I match finished FCSB 1:0 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and UTA Arad?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCSB won 2, UTA Arad won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs UTA Arad?

FCSB score 1.63 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 1.36. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FCSB's matches and 56% of UTA Arad's.

What form are FCSB and UTA Arad in?

Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and UTA Arad 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs UTA Arad?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.