Belgium - First Division BVan RoystadionData current as of 15 October 2026

FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II

FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH played Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 9 October 2026. Venue: Van Roystadion. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Club Brugge II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 1.33 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 2.20 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 17%, Club Brugge II 80%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 17%, Club Brugge II 80%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

FCV Dender EH has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.22. FCV Dender EH: 16.3 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 10.2.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 76-90+ (3 goals). Club Brugge II: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCV Dender EH have won their last five matches, scoring 12 goals and conceding just one, while Club Brugge II recorded two wins, two draws and one defeat over the same period, conceding 10 goals. At home, the hosts have won all three matches without conceding, while the visitors have conceded an average of 2.5 goals across their two away games. Dender average 5.33 shots on target per home match, compared with 4.5 for Club Brugge II away, and their xG stands at 1.48 versus 1.02 for Club Brugge II. However, the visitors have been clinical on the road, averaging 3 goals from an xG of 1.02, so despite the hosts’ clear advantage, their chances of scoring should not be underestimated.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the seasonal BTTS rates: 67% in Dender matches and 100% in Club Brugge II matches. The hosts averaged 1.67 goals scored, while the visitors conceded 2.5, making a Dender goal look likely. Club Brugge II averaged 2.2 goals scored across their last 5 matches, although their average xG was only 1.22, warranting caution when assessing that scoring record. The strongest argument against BTTS is the hosts’ defence: they conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, and BTTS landed in only 20% of those games. Even so, the teams’ seasonal results and the visitors’ regular scoring give a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dender’s matches have gone over 1.5 goals in 67% of cases, compared with 100% for Club Brugge II, making this the strongest signal for this line. The hosts have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4, while the visitors have conceded an average of 2.0 goals over the same period. Club Brugge II have recently averaged 2.2 goals scored, although Dender have conceded just 1 goal over that same period, so the outlook for the visitors is more cautious. The combined projection of 3.30 goals supports Over 1.5, but the gap between the visitors’ attacking output and the hosts’ recent defensive record limits confidence in higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, and neither went into the break trailing during that period. After the break, the home side should gain the advantage: they have won all 5 of their last matches, averaging 1.2 goals in the second half and conceding none. Club Brugge II conceded an average of 1.4 goals in the second halves of those matches and 2.0 goals across the full matches, compared with just 0.2 goals conceded by Dender. The home side also have the higher average xG, 1.43 to 1.02, although the visitors remain dangerous, averaging 2.2 goals in their last 5 matches. The combination of frequent half-time draws and Dender’s clearly stronger recent second-half performances points to an X/1 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
9Shots13
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
5Shots on target5
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1.11xG1.73
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
2Corners5
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
27Dangerous attacks75
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
12Fouls6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0Cards1
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1.33Goals scored / match2.2
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.33Goals conceded / match2
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
48%Average possession63%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
6Shots on target / match4.4
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.33Shots per match10.2
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
6Shots on target4.4
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
8.2%Shot conversion21.6%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
48%Possession63%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1.86xG for1.22
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1.16xG against1.55
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: AttackingClub Brugge II: Efficient finishing
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FCV Dender EH is 88% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.6 pts / match - Club Brugge II

FCV Dender EH
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
83% W0% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-1
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Club Brugge II
WWLDD
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Club Brugge II is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 2.2 goals / match - Club Brugge II

FCV Dender EH is 506% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 2 goals / match - Club Brugge II

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Club Brugge II scoring profile: mixed

Club Brugge II scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)11
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
2Goals conceded (season)10
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1.67Average goals in match4.2
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
8Goals scored (last 5)11
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
1Goals conceded (last 5)10
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
50%2 goals80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%3 goals40%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%4 goals20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%2 goals60%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%4 goals20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time40%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%BTTS in both halves40%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
50%Scored in both halves80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
20%BTTS - last 580%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Club Brugge II is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.8 pts / match - Club Brugge II

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Club Brugge II - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.8
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
67%Clean sheet before half-time60%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
50%No goal before half-time20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

After half-time (2nd half)

2.67Points per match (2nd half)0.8
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
0.83Average goals (2nd half)2.6
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II
17%No goal after half-time20%
FCV Dender EHClub Brugge II

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

83% W17% D0% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Club Brugge II - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.803.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Club Brugge II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
24%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.98
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaClub Brugge II
Average goals in match▼ 1.673.07▲ 4.20
Both teams scored▼ 17%55%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%62%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▲ 67%24%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%76%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Club Brugge IIYellow cardGianluca Tommaso Okon-Engstler
  2. FCV Dender EHGoalKrzysztof KotonAssist: Adam Nhaili
  3. FCV Dender EHGoalKrzysztof KotonAssist: Bo De Kerf
  4. FCV Dender EHGoalGerard Vandeplas
  5. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Samuel Gomez van HoogenOff: Alexander Vandeperre
  6. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Pjotr KestensOff: Adam Nhaili
  7. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Oumar BaldeOff: Gerard Vandeplas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II?

The First Division B match finished FCV Dender EH 3:0 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II?

FCV Dender EH score 1.33 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 2.20. The First Division B average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 17% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 80% of Club Brugge II's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Club Brugge II in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Club Brugge II 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Club Brugge II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.