Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 3half-time 1:1
KAA Gent crest
KAA Gent
120%(3.50)
X25%(3.60)
255%(2.00)

KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.

FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH played KAA Gent in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. KAA Gent: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 0.79 and concedes 1.66 goals per match. KAA Gent scores 1.59 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 55%, KAA Gent 59%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 48%, KAA Gent 59%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KAA Gent has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.27. FCV Dender EH: 10.8 shots per match, KAA Gent: 13.3.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.41. KAA Gent: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (6 goals). KAA Gent: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
15Shots12
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
4Shots on target8
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.57xG1.79
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
6Corners3
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
48Dangerous attacks65
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
12Fouls4
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1Cards1
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.79Goals scored / match1.59
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.66Goals conceded / match1.45
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
47%Average possession51%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3.86Shots on target / match4.41
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.76Shots per match13.28
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3.86Shots on target4.41
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
7.4%Shot conversion11.9%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
47%Possession51%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.27xG for1.49
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.7xG against1.61
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedKAA Gent: Balanced
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.8 pts / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
10% W34% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-10-16
0.66 pts / match · goal difference -25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
KAA Gent
WLLWW
Season result split
41% W21% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent is 101% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent

KAA Gent is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.66 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.45 goals / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 59% of matches (17 of 29 matches), while KAA Gent keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

KAA Gent scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

23Goals scored (season)46
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
48Goals conceded (season)42
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
2.45Average goals in match3.03
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
5Goals scored (last 5)8
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal79%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
21%2 goals41%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0%3 goals24%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0%4 goals14%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal76%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
52%2 goals41%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
21%3 goals21%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
7%4 goals7%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time14%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3%BTTS in both halves0%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
14%Scored in both halves34%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
60%BTTS - last 540%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.24 pts / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading48% draw34% trailing
KAA Gent - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.24
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.66
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1Average goals (1st half)1.34
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
66%No goal before half-time55%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)1.52
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.69
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
34%Clean sheet after half-time48%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
62%No goal after half-time31%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

17% W28% D55% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding59%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent - second-half results

38% W38% D24% L
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
KAA Gent - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
10
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

KAA Gent
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
10
16-30
8
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
15
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

KAA Gent

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaKAA Gent
Average goals in match 2.452.58 3.03
Both teams scored 55%53% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%46% 59%
Clean sheets 17%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 79%
Goal after half-time 79%74% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KAA GentGoalMax DeanAssist: Wilfried Aka Kanga
  2. FCV Dender EHGoalFabio FerraroAssist: Fabrice Sambu Mansoni
  3. KAA GentGoalAbdelhak KadriAssist: Michał Skóraś
  4. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Amine DaaliOff: Fabio Ferraro
  5. KAA GentSubstitutionOn: Aimé OmgbaOff: Max Dean
  6. FCV Dender EHYellow cardAmine Daali
  7. KAA GentYellow cardTiago Filipe Alves Araújo
  8. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Jordan AttahOff: Noah Mbamba
  9. KAA GentGoalWilfried Aka Kanga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Wesli De CremerMatches officiated: 16
4.75Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 231%Home wins31%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FCV Dender EH 0 - 0 - 1 KAA Gent. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KAA Gent
3 : 0
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:3 KAA Gent. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

FCV Dender EH score 0.79 goals per game on average and KAA Gent 1.59. The Pro League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 59% of KAA Gent's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and KAA Gent in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and KAA Gent 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.