FCV Dender EH vs KVC Westerlo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH played KVC Westerlo in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KVC Westerlo: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 0.67 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. KVC Westerlo scores 1.27 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 53%, KVC Westerlo 33%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 47%, KVC Westerlo 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

KVC Westerlo has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.19. FCV Dender EH: 10.3 shots per match, KVC Westerlo: 15.8.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.47. KVC Westerlo: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 76-90+ (5 goals). KVC Westerlo: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
8Shots19
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
4Shots on target5
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.1xG1.99
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
2Corners4
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
43Dangerous attacks62
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
16Fouls13
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
4Cards1
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0.67Goals scored / match1.27
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.6Goals conceded / match1.6
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
47%Average possession50%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
3.6Shots on target / match4.67
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.27Shots per match15.8
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
3.6Shots on target4.67
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
6.5%Shot conversion8%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
47%Possession50%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.19xG for1.76
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.67xG against1.47
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedKVC Westerlo: Attacking
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
Accuracy (shots on target)35%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FCV Dender EH is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 0.6 pts / match - KVC Westerlo

FCV Dender EH
LDLDW
Season result split
7% W33% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-9
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
KVC Westerlo
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W27% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KVC Westerlo is 90% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.27 goals / match - KVC Westerlo

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: mixed

FCV Dender EH scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

KVC Westerlo scoring profile: strong

KVC Westerlo scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

10Goals scored (season)19
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
24Goals conceded (season)24
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
2.27Average goals in match2.87
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
7Goals scored (last 5)1
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal53%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
13%2 goals40%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0%4 goals7%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal67%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
53%2 goals40%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
20%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0%4 goals20%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time13%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0%BTTS in both halves7%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
7%Scored in both halves33%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
100%BTTS - last 520%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KVC Westerlo is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.27 pts / match - KVC Westerlo

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
13% leading53% draw33% trailing
KVC Westerlo - half-time state
33% leading27% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.27
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.47
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.27
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
60%Clean sheet before half-time47%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
80%No goal before half-time67%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per match (2nd half)1.33
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.6
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
20%Clean sheet after half-time60%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo
60%No goal after half-time47%
FCV Dender EHKVC Westerlo

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

13% W20% D67% L
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding54%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KVC Westerlo - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
KVC Westerlo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
0
3
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
6
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KVC Westerlo
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

KVC Westerlo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaKVC Westerlo
Average goals in match 2.272.47 2.87
Both teams scored 53%52% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%42% 33%
Clean sheets 13%28% 33%
Goal before half-time 53%67% 73%
Goal after half-time 87%74% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardBryan Goncalves
  2. FCV Dender EHGoalDavid ToshevskiAssist: Fabio Ferraro
  3. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Josimar AlcócerOff: Issai Sakamoto
  4. KVC WesterloGoalAllahyar Sayyadmanesh
  5. FCV Dender EHGoalBruny Nsimba
  6. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Alireza Jahanbakhsh JirandehOff: David Toshevski
  7. KVC WesterloGoalIgnacio Ferri JuliàAssist: Arthur Piedfort
  8. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Thomas Van den KeybusOff: Griffin Yow
  9. FCV Dender EHYellow cardLuc Marijnissen
  10. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Desmond AcquahOff: Roman Květ
  11. KVC WesterloYellow cardAllahyar Sayyadmanesh
  12. FCV Dender EHYellow cardNoah Mbamba
  13. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Mohamed BerteOff: Bruny Nsimba
  14. FCV Dender EHYellow cardAlireza Jahanbakhsh Jirandeh
  15. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Serhiy SydorchukOff: Arthur Piedfort

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jan BoterbergMatches officiated: 24
4.08Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 228%Home wins33%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FCV Dender EH 0 - 1 - 0 KVC Westerlo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KVC Westerlo
1 : 1
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KVC Westerlo?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 2:2 KVC Westerlo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KVC Westerlo?

FCV Dender EH score 0.67 goals per game on average and KVC Westerlo 1.27. The Pro League average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 53% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 33% of KVC Westerlo's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and KVC Westerlo in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KVC Westerlo 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KVC Westerlo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.