Belgium - First Division BVan RoystadionData current as of 17 October 2026

FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
2 : 0half-time 1:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Van Roystadion. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match. RFC Seraing: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 1.33 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 33%, RFC Seraing 67%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 33%, RFC Seraing 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

FCV Dender EH has higher xG: 2.18 vs 1.51. FCV Dender EH: 19.0 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 12.3.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 76-90+ (2 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCV Dender EH sit 3rd, while RFC Seraing are only 14th, and the hosts’ season record stands at 2 wins from 3 matches compared with 0 victories for the visitors. At home, Dender have won 100% of their matches, scoring an average of 2 goals and yet to concede, with an xG of 2.02 and just 1.13 xG allowed to opponents. Seraing have lost both of their away matches so far, conceding an average of 3 goals per game and keeping no clean sheets. The hosts also create significantly more danger, averaging 16 shots and 9 on target, compared with 11 and 6 respectively for the visitors. Recent form further supports Dender: they have collected 9 points from their last five matches, while Seraing have managed only 2 and conceded as many as 13 goals during that period.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by the fact that RFC Seraing have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, while FCV Dender EH have done so in 50%; across their last five games, both teams stand at 60%. The hosts have averaged 1.4 goals scored in this run, while Seraing have conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match, significantly increasing the likelihood of a Dender goal. The visitors have scored just 0.8 goals in their last five outings, but the hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match this season and allow opponents an average of 1.45 xG. Both teams also create a comparable number of shots on target, with 6 per match, while their xG over the last five games stands at 1.74 for Dender and 1.51 for Seraing. The risk to the pick is the hosts’ poor conversion rate of just 4%, but the visitors’ highly vulnerable defense makes the BTTS scenario more likely than either side failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have cleared this line in 100% of their league matches so far. Dender have averaged 1.4 goals scored and created chances worth 1.74 xG in their last five games, while Seraing have conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match over the same period. The visitors have managed just 0.8 goals per game in their last five appearances, but their average xG stands at 1.51 compared with the 1.44 xG allowed by Dender. Both teams average 6 shots on target, which supports at least two goals, although the Over/Under 2.5 line is clearly more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is FCV Dender EH leading at half-time and the home side securing the win at full-time (1/1). In their last five matches, Dender won 60% of their games and averaged 1.4 goals, while RFC Seraing recorded no victories, scored 0.8 goals, and conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match. The home side led at the break in 40% of their recent appearances, whereas the visitors were trailing at half-time in 75% of theirs, scoring just 0.25 goals before the interval. Dender also create better chances, with an average xG of 1.61 compared with their opponents’ 1.33, while Seraing kept no clean sheets in any of the matches analysed. The home side should establish their advantage early, while the visitors’ defensive weaknesses increase the likelihood of Dender maintaining it until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
9Shots12
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
3Shots on target1
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
1.03xG1.15
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
4Corners4
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
34Dangerous attacks45
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
17Fouls6
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
2Cards3
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
1.33Goals scored / match1
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0.67Goals conceded / match2
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
47%Average possession39%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
7.67Shots on target / match6
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

19Shots per match12.33
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
7.67Shots on target6
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
7%Shot conversion8.1%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
47%Possession39%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
2.18xG for1.51
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
1.26xG against1.38
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: AttackingRFC Seraing: Balanced
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)40%49%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FCV Dender EH is 506% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 0.33 pts / match - RFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 2.18Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
RFC Seraing
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCV Dender EH is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1 goals / match - RFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH is 199% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 2 goals / match - RFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
2Goals conceded (season)6
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
2Average goals in match3
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
4Goals scored (last 5)3
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
67%2 goals33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%3 goals0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%4 goals0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%2 goals67%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%3 goals33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%4 goals0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
67%Scored in both halves0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
33%BTTS - last 567%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCV Dender EH is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1 pts / match - RFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
33%No goal before half-time67%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per match (2nd half)0.67
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing
33%No goal after half-time67%
FCV Dender EHRFC Seraing

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.332.33
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.0
Average goals in match1.30.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.67
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.31.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.92
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.81▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%52%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%57%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 33%24%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%81%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%81%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Pedro Injai GomesOff: Bo De Kerf
  2. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Adam NhailiOff: Malcolm Viltard
  3. FCV Dender EHYellow cardNathan Rodes
  4. FCV Dender EHGoalAmine Daali
  5. RFC SeraingYellow cardWassim Bahri
  6. RFC SeraingYellow cardVictor Corneillie
  7. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Tom LockmanOff: Oussmane Kébé
  8. FCV Dender EHYellow cardFabrice Sambu Mansoni

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished FCV Dender EH 2:0 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing?

FCV Dender EH score 1.33 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.00. The First Division B average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 33% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 67% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and RFC Seraing 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.