FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège: match statistics
FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FCV Dender EH played Standard Liège in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
FCV Dender EH: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Standard Liège: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FCV Dender EH scores 0.83 and concedes 1.78 goals per match. Standard Liège scores 0.89 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FCV Dender EH 61%, Standard Liège 33%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 56%, Standard Liège 39%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
FCV Dender EH has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.17. FCV Dender EH: 10.1 shots per match, Standard Liège: 9.8.
Match halves
FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Standard Liège: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
FCV Dender EH: 76-90+ (5 goals). Standard Liège: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FCV Dender EH | Standard Liège | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FCV Dender EH is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.4 pts / match - Standard Liège
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Standard Liège is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 0.89 goals / match - Standard Liège
Standard Liège is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.78 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.17 goals / match - Standard Liège
FCV Dender EH scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Standard Liège keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
Standard Liège scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCV Dender EH
Over / Under - Standard Liège
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Standard Liège is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.39 pts / match - Standard Liège
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCV Dender EH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Standard Liège - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FCV Dender EH
Standard Liège
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| FCV Dender EH | Liga | Standard Liège | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.61 | 2.52 | ▼ 2.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 54% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 44% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 69% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 75% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FCV Dender EH 0 - 1 - 0 Standard Liège. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège?
The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 0:1 Standard Liège. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège?
FCV Dender EH score 0.83 goals per game on average and Standard Liège 0.89. The Pro League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 61% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 33% of Standard Liège's.
What form are FCV Dender EH and Standard Liège in?
Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Standard Liège 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Standard Liège: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.