Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM: match statistics
Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fernando de la Mora played General Caballero JLM in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 5 October 2026. Venue: Estadio Emilio Ghezzi. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Fernando de la Mora: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. General Caballero JLM: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fernando de la Mora scores 1.15 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. General Caballero JLM scores 2.00 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fernando de la Mora 58%, General Caballero JLM 69%. Over 2.5: Fernando de la Mora 46%, General Caballero JLM 69%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
General Caballero JLM has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.55. Fernando de la Mora: 11.9 shots per match, General Caballero JLM: 12.6.
Match halves
Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.77. General Caballero JLM: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (9 goals). General Caballero JLM: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
General Caballero JLM sit 2nd and have won 15 of their 26 matches, while Fernando de la Mora are 9th with 9 wins. Away from home, the visitors average 1.54 goals per game, compared with the hosts’ 1.08 at home, despite taking fewer shots per match (10.69 vs. 13.15), which points to greater finishing efficiency. They also hold a slight defensive edge, conceding an average of 1.15 goals away from home compared with the hosts’ 1.23 at home. The prediction is complicated by the quality of chances created—Fernando’s home xG is 1.65, while the visitors’ away xG is 1.42—and by recent form: the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors have won 2. Despite these caveats, the visitors’ advantage in season points and scoring efficiency makes them the pick to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Fernando de la Mora have seen both teams score in 77% of their matches, compared with 62% for General Caballero JLM, with both sides above the league average of 56%. This scenario occurred in 60% and 80% of their respective last 5 matches, reinforcing the season-long trend. The hosts average 2.46 goals scored and the visitors 1.54; their corresponding xG figures are 1.71 and 1.42, giving both sides a solid basis for finding the net. The average goals conceded—1.38 by the hosts and 1.15 by the visitors—also reduce the risk of either team failing to score, although the visitors have conceded 1.6 goals per match across their last 5 games. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is more likely than BTTS - No, which means at least one team fails to score, although the visitors’ 23% rate of matches without scoring means this pick cannot be considered a certainty.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Fernando de la Mora average 2.46 goals per match, while General Caballero JLM average 1.54, pointing to strong attacking potential on both sides. Their head-to-head record also supports at least two goals: the 1.5-goal line has been exceeded in 85% of the home side’s matches and 77% of the visitors’ matches. In their last five appearances, the visitors scored an average of 1.8 goals but conceded 1.6, so their current form also points to goals at both ends. An estimated total of 3.05 goals supports the Over, although the gap at the higher line—with at least four goals in 54% of the home side’s matches and 31% of the visitors’—adds uncertainty there. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick: it is well supported by both teams’ results and requires only two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fernando de la Mora win 77% of their matches, compared with General Caballero JLM’s 38%, clearly favouring the hosts in the final outcome. The home side led at the break in 6 of 13 matches and average 1.31 goals before half-time, compared with 0.69 for the visitors, making a Fernando de la Mora half-time lead the most likely single scenario. Their attacking edge is also reflected in an average of 6.69 shots on target per match against the visitors’ 4.31, as well as an xG of 1.71 versus 1.42. The second-half figures also support the hosts’ ability to hold onto their lead: they average 1.15 goals scored and 0.62 conceded after the break, while the visitors score 0.85 and concede 0.69. A half-time draw remains a significant alternative, as Fernando de la Mora were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches. However, their advantage in full-time results makes the pick a home lead at half-time and a home win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fernando de la Mora | General Caballero JLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fernando de la Mora is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.4 pts / match - General Caballero JLM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
General Caballero JLM is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 2 goals / match - General Caballero JLM
General Caballero JLM is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.35 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.27 goals / match - General Caballero JLM
Fernando de la Mora scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while General Caballero JLM keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
General Caballero JLM scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
Over / Under - General Caballero JLM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
General Caballero JLM is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora · 1.58 pts / match - General Caballero JLM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
General Caballero JLM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fernando de la Mora
General Caballero JLM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Fernando de la Mora | Liga | General Caballero JLM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.50 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 46% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 66% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fernando de la Mora 1 - 0 - 0 General Caballero JLM. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM?
The Division Intermedia match finished Fernando de la Mora 0:2 General Caballero JLM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM?
Fernando de la Mora score 1.15 goals per game on average and General Caballero JLM 2.00. The Division Intermedia average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Fernando de la Mora's matches and 69% of General Caballero JLM's.
What form are Fernando de la Mora and General Caballero JLM in?
Over the last 5 games Fernando de la Mora have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and General Caballero JLM 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM?
The statistical background for Fernando de la Mora vs General Caballero JLM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


