Netherlands - EredivisieStadion FeijenoordData current as of 15 October 2026

Feyenoord vs AZ: match statistics

Feyenoord crest
Feyenoord
2 : 0half-time 1:0
AZ crest
AZ

Feyenoord vs AZ: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Feyenoord played AZ in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stadion Feijenoord. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Feyenoord: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. AZ: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Feyenoord scores 3.57 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. AZ scores 2.57 and concedes 0.86. League average: 3.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Feyenoord 57%, AZ 57%. Over 2.5: Feyenoord 86%, AZ 43%. League level: BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 75%.

xG, shots and style

Feyenoord has higher xG: 2.42 vs 2.30. Feyenoord: 22.3 shots per match, AZ: 19.6.

Match halves

Feyenoord: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 1.71. AZ: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.71.

Goals by minute

Feyenoord: 31-45+ (7 goals). AZ: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.82 goals per match, BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 75%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AZ have won all 3 of their away matches so far, while Feyenoord have recorded 1 win and 2 draws at home, giving the visitors a slight edge in this matchup. However, the hosts create more chances: they average 27.67 shots per home match compared with AZ’s 21.67 away from home, and their xG stands at 2.92 versus their opponents’ 2.61. Both teams average 3 goals in these conditions, although AZ are more clinical in front of goal, converting 14% of their shots compared with Feyenoord’s 11%. The visitors also have a slight defensive edge in terms of goals conceded: they allow an average of 1 goal away from home, while the hosts concede 1.33 at home. With both teams sharing the same record over their last 5 matches—3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat—AZ’s perfect away record tips the prediction in their favour, but Feyenoord’s superior chance creation keeps the hosts’ chances of success high.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have strong attacks: Feyenoord average 2.25 goals at home, while AZ average 3.00 away, with xG figures of 2.08 and 2.61 respectively. Neither team has yet failed to score in these conditions, which points towards goals at both ends. In their last five matches, BTTS landed in 60% of games for both teams, while Feyenoord conceded an average of 1.6 goals compared with 1.2 for AZ. Caution is warranted given Feyenoord’s 50% home clean-sheet rate, but AZ’s attack, averaging 9.33 shots on target away from home, increases the chances of breaching that defence. Therefore, I consider both teams to score more likely than a match in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Feyenoord average 2.25 goals and AZ 3.00, giving both teams the potential to clear the 1.5-goal line even without an opponent’s contribution. Their average xG stands at 2.08 and 2.61 respectively, although their defenses limit opponents to 0.84 and 1.01 xG, supporting a more cautious forecast of 3.50 total goals. Feyenoord’s last five matches averaged 5.2 goals, while AZ’s fixtures averaged 3.2; the 1.5-goal line was also cleared in 75% of home matches and 100% of away matches. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick, while Over 2.5 offers less of an edge given the difference between Feyenoord’s rate of such matches (25%) and AZ’s (67%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Feyenoord led at the break in 3 of 4 home matches, while AZ had led at half-time just once in 3 away games. The hosts average 1.00 goals scored and 0.25 conceded before the break, supporting the case for an early lead. Holding on to that advantage is a realistic prospect: Feyenoord won 3 of 4 home matches and, across their last five games, averaged 2.4 goals after half-time compared with AZ’s 1.0. However, the risk of a turnaround remains significant, as AZ have won all 3 away matches and averaged 2.33 goals after the break in those games. Therefore, Feyenoord leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes is the most likely single scenario, although it has only a narrow edge over outcomes involving an AZ win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
FeyenoordAZ
15Shots12
FeyenoordAZ
4Shots on target2
FeyenoordAZ
1.51xG1.29
FeyenoordAZ
7Corners6
FeyenoordAZ
39Dangerous attacks53
FeyenoordAZ
12Fouls15
FeyenoordAZ
1Cards3
FeyenoordAZ

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.57Goals scored / match2.57
FeyenoordAZ
1Goals conceded / match0.86
FeyenoordAZ
56%Average possession59%
FeyenoordAZ
8.57Shots on target / match7.57
FeyenoordAZ

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

22.29Shots per match19.57
FeyenoordAZ
8.57Shots on target7.57
FeyenoordAZ
16%Shot conversion13.1%
FeyenoordAZ
56%Possession59%
FeyenoordAZ
2.42xG for2.3
FeyenoordAZ
1.04xG against0.91
FeyenoordAZ

Shooting quality

Feyenoord: DominantAZ: Dominant
FeyenoordAZ
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Feyenoord
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
71% W29% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-0
2.43 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.43Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
AZ
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
86% W14% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-0
2.71 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 away
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.45Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Feyenoord is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

3.57 goals / match - Feyenoord · 2.57 goals / match - AZ

AZ is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Feyenoord · 0.86 goals / match - AZ

Feyenoord scoring profile: very strong

Feyenoord scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while AZ keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

AZ scoring profile: very strong

AZ scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Feyenoord keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

25Goals scored (season)18
FeyenoordAZ
7Goals conceded (season)6
FeyenoordAZ
4.57Average goals in match3.43
FeyenoordAZ
22Goals scored (last 5)12
FeyenoordAZ
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
FeyenoordAZ

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
FeyenoordAZ
86%2 goals71%
FeyenoordAZ
57%3 goals43%
FeyenoordAZ
43%4 goals29%
FeyenoordAZ

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal57%
FeyenoordAZ
43%2 goals29%
FeyenoordAZ
0%3 goals0%
FeyenoordAZ
0%4 goals0%
FeyenoordAZ

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ
0%BTTS in both halves14%
FeyenoordAZ
43%Scored in both halves43%
FeyenoordAZ

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
FeyenoordAZ
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FeyenoordAZ
60%BTTS - last 560%
FeyenoordAZ

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
FeyenoordAZ
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ
43%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FeyenoordAZ
86%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
FeyenoordAZ
57%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Feyenoord is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.29 pts / match - Feyenoord · 2 pts / match - AZ

Feyenoord - half-time state
71% leading14% draw14% trailing
AZ - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.29Points per match (1st half)2
FeyenoordAZ
1.86Goals scored (1st half)0.86
FeyenoordAZ
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
FeyenoordAZ
2Average goals (1st half)1.29
FeyenoordAZ
86%Clean sheet before half-time71%
FeyenoordAZ
29%No goal before half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ

After half-time (2nd half)

1.86Points per match (2nd half)2.29
FeyenoordAZ
1.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.71
FeyenoordAZ
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
FeyenoordAZ
2.57Average goals (2nd half)2.14
FeyenoordAZ
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
FeyenoordAZ
29%No goal after half-time29%
FeyenoordAZ

Feyenoord - second-half results

57% W14% D29% L
16
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AZ - second-half results

71% W14% D14% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 86%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Feyenoord - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match2.02.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match2.23.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals60%80%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+9+8
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 10
AZ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Feyenoord
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
7
0
31-45
3
2
46-60
7
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

AZ
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Feyenoord

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

AZ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

FeyenoordLigaAZ
Average goals in match▲ 4.573.82▼ 3.43
Both teams scored▼ 57%69%▼ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 86%75%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 43%16%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%82%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 86%92%▼ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.82
Average goals per match
69%
Both teams scored
75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
1.74
Home goals / match
2.08
Away goals / match
+-16%
Home attack advantage
+-20%
Home defence advantage
+-11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
69%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AZYellow cardLewis Schouten
  2. AZYellow cardRo-Zangelo Daal
  3. FeyenoordYellow cardOussama Targhalline
  4. AZYellow cardWouter Goes
  5. FeyenoordSubstitutionOn: Tobias van den ElshoutOff: Gjivai Zechiël
  6. AZSubstitutionOn: Bendegúz KovácsOff: Jordy Clasie
  7. FeyenoordSubstitutionOn: Gaoussou Kyassou DiarraOff: Ignacio Ferri Julià

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Feyenoord 0 - 2 - 0 AZ. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Feyenoord Rotterdam
1 : 1
Alkmaar Zaanstreek
Alkmaar Zaanstreek
3 : 3
Feyenoord Rotterdam

FAQ

What was the result of Feyenoord vs AZ?

The Eredivisie match finished Feyenoord 2:0 AZ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Feyenoord and AZ?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Feyenoord won 0, AZ won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Feyenoord vs AZ?

Feyenoord score 3.57 goals per game on average and AZ 2.57. The Eredivisie average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 75% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Feyenoord's matches and 57% of AZ's.

What form are Feyenoord and AZ in?

Over the last 5 games Feyenoord have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and AZ 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Feyenoord vs AZ?

The statistical background for Feyenoord vs AZ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.