FH vs Fram: match statistics
FH vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FH play Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 3:4.
Current form
FH: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
FH scores 1.33 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Fram scores 2.73 and concedes 1.87. League average: 4.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FH 67%, Fram 73%. Over 2.5: FH 60%, Fram 73%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Fram has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.72. FH: 13.6 shots per match, Fram: 17.7.
Match halves
FH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47. Fram: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.40.
Goals by minute
FH: 31-45+ (6 goals). Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 67%.
Match description
I predict an away win (Fram). Fram sit 5th in the table while FH are 11th; this season Fram have 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss versus FH’s 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses. Fram have scored 11 goals in 4 matches (2.75 per match) compared to FH’s 5 goals (1.25 per match). In the last 5 matches Fram have scored 13 and conceded 10 (avg 2.6/2.0), while FH have scored 9 and conceded 13 (avg 1.8/2.6); Fram also have higher PPG in the last 5: 1.4 vs 0.8 for FH. Additionally, Fram’s away data shows average xG 2.02 with xG against 0.72, 61% possession and about 20 shots per match, indicating control and quality of chances, whereas FH’s home data shows 0 average shots and 0 shots on target, indicating issues creating opportunities. Considering Fram’s advantage in goals, xG, possession and PPG, their victory is the most likely outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FH | Fram | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fram is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - FH · 2 pts / match - Fram
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 105% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - FH · 2.73 goals / match - Fram
Fram is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.07 goals / match - FH · 1.87 goals / match - Fram
FH scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
Fram scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — FH
Over / Under — Fram
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - FH · 1.8 pts / match - Fram
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Fram - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FH
Fram
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | Fram | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.40 | 4.04 | ▲ 4.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 74% | • 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 73% | • 73% |
| Clean sheets | • 13% | 14% | • 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): FH 0 - 1 - 2 Fram. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs Fram?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 3:4 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FH and Fram?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FH won 0, Fram won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs Fram?
FH score 1.33 goals per game on average and Fram 2.73. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 67% of FH's matches and 73% of Fram's.
What form are FH and Fram in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Fram 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs Fram?
The statistical background for FH vs Fram — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.