Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildKaplakrikavöllurData current as of 06 September 2026

FH vs KA: match statistics

FH crest
FH
1 : 2half-time 1:0
KA crest
KA

FH vs KA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FH played KA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

FH: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. KA: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FH scores 1.83 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. KA scores 1.17 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FH 83%, KA 50%. Over 2.5: FH 83%, KA 33%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

FH has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.49. FH: 13.0 shots per match, KA: 13.8.

Match halves

FH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. KA: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

FH: 0-15 (3 goals). KA: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.92 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2): KA has a clear defensive edge and a superior league position — 6th vs 11th for FH — and concedes only 0.5 goals per away match on average, while the hosts concede 4.0 goals per home match. In the last 5 games KA recorded 2 wins and averages 1.4 points per match, whereas FH have not won any of their last 5 and average just 0.2 points per match. Offensively FH are dangerous at home (avg. 3.0 goals scored, 13 shots and 5 on target per match, with a 23% conversion), but their home xG is only 1.83 versus xG against 2.38, indicating defensive instability. KA away have xG 1.64 and xG against 1.9 and keep a clean sheet in 50% of away matches, suggesting better defensive balance. Considering the gap in average goals conceded (4.0 vs 0.5), the points advantage over the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 0.2) and superior defensive organization, I give KA a 65% chance to win, draw 15% and home win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) arises from league context and form: the league has 72% of matches with both teams scoring, both teams’ season BTTS is 50%, and in the last 5 matches both have 60% BTTS. FH averages 1.25 goals scored and concedes 1.75 seasonally, but in the last 5 matches concedes 3.8 goals on average (19 goals in 5 matches), while KA scores 1.0 and concedes 0.5 for the season, yet in the last 5 concedes 1.0 (5 goals) and scores 1.2 on average. xG comparison shows KA generates 1.64 xG while FH’s defense allows 1.61 xG, so KA should create scoring chances; concurrently FH generates 1.42 xG versus KA’s defense that allows 1.9 xG, increasing FH’s chance of scoring as well. Both teams average about 14 shots per match (13.75 and 14.0) with 4–4.5 shots on target and conversion rates of 9% for FH vs 7% for KA, providing realistic conversion chances for both sides. Given the league 72% BTTS, recent 60% for both teams and FH’s particularly severe defensive issues (3.8 conceded in 5), I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimated expected goals at 1.66 for FH and 1.63 for KA (total 3.29) — calculated from average xG: FH offensive xG 1.42 and KA conceded xG 1.90 yield 1.66, while KA offensive xG 1.64 and FH conceded xG 1.61 yield 1.63. FH conceded 19 goals in the last 5 matches (3.8 per game on average) and all those fixtures had Over 2.5 goals; KA’s last 5 show an offensive xG of 1.79, and both teams scored in 60% of their last 5 matches. Seasonally FH has 100% of matches Over 1.5 goals, KA 50%, and the league averages 4.0 goals per game, which further favors high-scoring outcomes. With a total goals expectation of 3.29, a Poisson distribution gives roughly an 84% chance of Over 1.5, about 64% for Over 2.5 and about 42% for Over 3.5, which statistically supports the Over side. For these reasons I recommend playing Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: Over) as the most probable and strongest available signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics show draws dominate at half-time — hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches and visitors also in 50%, so a half-time draw is the most likely scenario. The full-time outcome favors the away side: visitors won 50% of matches and average 2.0 points per game versus 0.75 for hosts, while conceding only 0.5 goals per game on average, indicating solid defensive form. The visitors also have a higher xG (1.64 vs. 1.42 for the hosts) and score on average 1.0 goal in the second half compared to 0.5 for the hosts, which increases their chances of clawing back or turning the result around after the break. Hosts, however, score more often before half-time (on average 0.75 goals by half-time and 6 first-half goals for hosts versus 1 for visitors), therefore the scenario of a draw at half-time and an away win by full-time (X/2) is the most logical. Based on this I assign X/2 the highest probability (30%), with the remaining outcomes allocated smaller shares.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
FHKA
17Shots15
FHKA
5Shots on target4
FHKA
1.92xG2.24
FHKA
6Corners5
FHKA
69Dangerous attacks139
FHKA
16Fouls19
FHKA
3Cards3
FHKA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.17
FHKA
3Goals conceded / match1.33
FHKA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match13.83
FHKA
5.33Shots on target4.17
FHKA
14.1%Shot conversion8.4%
FHKA
40%Possession47%
FHKA
1.62xG for1.49
FHKA
2.16xG against1.71
FHKA

Shooting quality

FH: Counter-attackingKA: Balanced
FHKA
Accuracy (shots on target)41%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KA is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - FH · 1.4 pts / match - KA

FH
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 2.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
KA
LDLWW
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FH is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - FH · 1.17 goals / match - KA

KA is 126% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - FH · 1.33 goals / match - KA

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

11Goals scored (season)7
FHKA
18Goals conceded (season)8
FHKA
4.83Average goals in match2.5
FHKA
10Goals scored (last 5)5
FHKA
17Goals conceded (last 5)5
FHKA

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
FHKA
67%2 goals33%
FHKA
33%3 goals0%
FHKA
0%4 goals0%
FHKA

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
FHKA
83%2 goals50%
FHKA
83%3 goals17%
FHKA
33%4 goals0%
FHKA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time33%
FHKA
17%BTTS in both halves17%
FHKA
17%Scored in both halves33%
FHKA

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
FHKA
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FHKA
80%BTTS - last 540%
FHKA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FHKA
83%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FHKA
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
FHKA

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FHKA
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
FHKA
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
FHKA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KA is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - FH · 1 pts / match - KA

FH - half-time state
17% leading17% draw67% trailing
KA - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1
FHKA
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
FHKA
2Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
FHKA
3Average goals (1st half)1.17
FHKA
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FHKA
50%No goal before half-time50%
FHKA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.67
FHKA
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
FHKA
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
FHKA
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.33
FHKA
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FHKA
50%No goal after half-time33%
FHKA

FH - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
4
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KA - second-half results

50% W17% R33% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match2.21.2
Average goals in match3.42.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FH
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KA
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
165%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FHLigaKA
Average goals in match 4.833.92 2.50
Both teams scored 83%71% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%74% 33%
Clean sheets 0%16% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%82% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%89% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.92
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.11
Home goals / match
1.82
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): FH 1 - 0 - 1 KA. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FH Hafnarfjördur
5 : 0
KA Akureyri
KA Akureyri
3 : 2
FH Hafnarfjördur

FAQ

What was the result of FH vs KA?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:2 KA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FH and KA?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FH won 1, KA won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FH vs KA?

FH score 1.83 goals per game on average and KA 1.17. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 83% of FH's matches and 50% of KA's.

What form are FH and KA in?

Over the last 5 games FH have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and KA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs KA?

The statistical background for FH vs KA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.