FH vs KA: match statistics
FH vs KA: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FH played KA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
FH: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. KA: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FH scores 1.83 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. KA scores 1.17 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FH 83%, KA 50%. Over 2.5: FH 83%, KA 33%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.
xG, shots and style
FH has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.49. FH: 13.0 shots per match, KA: 13.8.
Match halves
FH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. KA: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
FH: 0-15 (3 goals). KA: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 3.92 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 74%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2): KA has a clear defensive edge and a superior league position — 6th vs 11th for FH — and concedes only 0.5 goals per away match on average, while the hosts concede 4.0 goals per home match. In the last 5 games KA recorded 2 wins and averages 1.4 points per match, whereas FH have not won any of their last 5 and average just 0.2 points per match. Offensively FH are dangerous at home (avg. 3.0 goals scored, 13 shots and 5 on target per match, with a 23% conversion), but their home xG is only 1.83 versus xG against 2.38, indicating defensive instability. KA away have xG 1.64 and xG against 1.9 and keep a clean sheet in 50% of away matches, suggesting better defensive balance. Considering the gap in average goals conceded (4.0 vs 0.5), the points advantage over the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 0.2) and superior defensive organization, I give KA a 65% chance to win, draw 15% and home win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) arises from league context and form: the league has 72% of matches with both teams scoring, both teams’ season BTTS is 50%, and in the last 5 matches both have 60% BTTS. FH averages 1.25 goals scored and concedes 1.75 seasonally, but in the last 5 matches concedes 3.8 goals on average (19 goals in 5 matches), while KA scores 1.0 and concedes 0.5 for the season, yet in the last 5 concedes 1.0 (5 goals) and scores 1.2 on average. xG comparison shows KA generates 1.64 xG while FH’s defense allows 1.61 xG, so KA should create scoring chances; concurrently FH generates 1.42 xG versus KA’s defense that allows 1.9 xG, increasing FH’s chance of scoring as well. Both teams average about 14 shots per match (13.75 and 14.0) with 4–4.5 shots on target and conversion rates of 9% for FH vs 7% for KA, providing realistic conversion chances for both sides. Given the league 72% BTTS, recent 60% for both teams and FH’s particularly severe defensive issues (3.8 conceded in 5), I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimated expected goals at 1.66 for FH and 1.63 for KA (total 3.29) — calculated from average xG: FH offensive xG 1.42 and KA conceded xG 1.90 yield 1.66, while KA offensive xG 1.64 and FH conceded xG 1.61 yield 1.63. FH conceded 19 goals in the last 5 matches (3.8 per game on average) and all those fixtures had Over 2.5 goals; KA’s last 5 show an offensive xG of 1.79, and both teams scored in 60% of their last 5 matches. Seasonally FH has 100% of matches Over 1.5 goals, KA 50%, and the league averages 4.0 goals per game, which further favors high-scoring outcomes. With a total goals expectation of 3.29, a Poisson distribution gives roughly an 84% chance of Over 1.5, about 64% for Over 2.5 and about 42% for Over 3.5, which statistically supports the Over side. For these reasons I recommend playing Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: Over) as the most probable and strongest available signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics show draws dominate at half-time — hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches and visitors also in 50%, so a half-time draw is the most likely scenario. The full-time outcome favors the away side: visitors won 50% of matches and average 2.0 points per game versus 0.75 for hosts, while conceding only 0.5 goals per game on average, indicating solid defensive form. The visitors also have a higher xG (1.64 vs. 1.42 for the hosts) and score on average 1.0 goal in the second half compared to 0.5 for the hosts, which increases their chances of clawing back or turning the result around after the break. Hosts, however, score more often before half-time (on average 0.75 goals by half-time and 6 first-half goals for hosts versus 1 for visitors), therefore the scenario of a draw at half-time and an away win by full-time (X/2) is the most logical. Based on this I assign X/2 the highest probability (30%), with the remaining outcomes allocated smaller shares.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FH | KA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KA is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - FH · 1.4 pts / match - KA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FH is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - FH · 1.17 goals / match - KA
KA is 126% better for: goals conceded per match.
3 goals / match - FH · 1.33 goals / match - KA
FH scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
KA scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FH
Over / Under - KA
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KA is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - FH · 1 pts / match - KA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FH
KA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | KA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.83 | 3.92 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 16% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): FH 1 - 0 - 1 KA. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs KA?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:2 KA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FH and KA?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches FH won 1, KA won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs KA?
FH score 1.83 goals per game on average and KA 1.17. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 83% of FH's matches and 50% of KA's.
What form are FH and KA in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and KA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs KA?
The statistical background for FH vs KA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


