Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildKaplakrikavöllurData current as of 06 September 2026

FH vs Thór: match statistics

FH crest
FH
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Thór crest
Thór

FH vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FH played Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FH: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Thór: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FH scores 1.40 and concedes 2.70 goals per match. Thór scores 0.80 and concedes 2.70. League average: 4.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FH 70%, Thór 50%. Over 2.5: FH 80%, Thór 70%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

FH has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.23. FH: 12.5 shots per match, Thór: 11.1.

Match halves

FH: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.50. Thór: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

FH: 31-45+ (5 goals). Thór: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.05 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FH has a clear advantage in chance creation and quality of scoring opportunities: at home they average 15 shots and 3.67 on target per match versus Thór’s 10.4 shots and 3.2 on target away, and their average xG is 1.78 compared to the visitors’ 1.16. This translates into greater offensive efficiency — the hosts score 1.33 goals per home match, while Thór scores 0.8 goals away, and the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches versus 33% for hosts. Both teams, however, have defensive issues: FH concedes 2.33 goals on average at home, and Thór concedes as many as 3.4 away; in the last 5 matches FH has conceded 14 goals and Thór 16, indicating a high number of shots on target and high-danger situations. Recent form favors the hosts — FH has 1 win and 3 goals scored in the last 5 matches with 0.6 points per match in that period, while Thór has not won any match and averages 0 points per match. Considering the higher xG (1.78 vs 1.16), more shots (15 vs 10.4) and superior goal conversion (1.33 vs 0.8), I forecast an FH victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The main indicators favor BTTS: league BTTS rate is 71% with an average of 4.05 goals per match, indicating a high scoring environment. FH has a season BTTS of 60% and averages 0.8 goals scored while conceding 2.0 per game; Thór has a BTTS of 40% and also scores 0.8 while conceding 3.4, so both teams are highly vulnerable to conceding. xG shows FH produces 1.29 and allows 1.98 xG, while Thór produces 1.16 and allows 2.56 xG — both sides concede more chances than they create, which supports both-teams-to-score outcomes. In the last 5 matches both sides averaged 0.6 goals scored and conceded 2.8 (FH) and 3.2 (Thór) respectively, and Thór’s lack of clean sheets (0% CS) further increases BTTS likelihood. Therefore I recommend BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and form analysis indicate high goal potential: expected goals are 1.93 for FH and 1.57 for Thór, totaling 3.50 xG. The league averages 4.05 goals per match, and this season Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of FH matches and 80% of Thór matches; in the last 5 meetings both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Both sides concede heavily – FH and Thór have each conceded 27 goals this season, and in the last 5 matches they have conceded on average 2.8 and 3.2 goals respectively, which increases the likelihood of further goals. Offensive metrics corroborate this: FH averages 11.8 shots and has xG 1.29, Thór 10.4 shots and xG 1.16, while the visitors allow xG against of 2.56. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 2.5 – with an expected 3.50 goals the estimated probability of Over 2.5 is around 68%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Both teams concede many goals: FH averages 2.0 goals per match, while Thór concedes as many as 3.4 goals per match against a league average of 4.05 goals per fixture, indicating an open, high-scoring game. At half-time the statistics favor the home side — Thór were trailing at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), whereas FH were leading at half-time in 1 of 5 (20%), so a FH lead at 45 minutes is highly likely. However, the second half is particularly goal-rich: the average number of goals in the second half is 1.8 for FH matches and 2.4 for Thór matches, and the percentage of games with at least one goal after the break is 100% for the home team and 80% for the visitors, which supports potential turnarounds. Additionally, Thór concede an average of 2.56 xG against and on the season concede 3.4 goals, so their defense is vulnerable to goals after the break; FH have xG of 1.29 versus Thór’s 1.16, but both teams create and concede chances. As a result, the most likely scenario is a FH lead at half-time and a Thór win after 90 minutes (HT/FT 1/2), and I assign the highest probability to that scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
FHThór
15Shots7
FHThór
6Shots on target1
FHThór
1.91xG0.84
FHThór
6Corners1
FHThór
76Dangerous attacks45
FHThór
15Fouls11
FHThór
1Cards3
FHThór

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.8
FHThór
2.7Goals conceded / match2.7
FHThór
40%Average possession42%
FHThór
4.2Shots on target / match3.4
FHThór

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match11.1
FHThór
4.2Shots on target3.4
FHThór
11.2%Shot conversion7.2%
FHThór
40%Possession42%
FHThór
1.52xG for1.23
FHThór
2.18xG against2.27
FHThór

Shooting quality

FH: BalancedThór: Balanced
FHThór
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FH
DLLLW
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Thór
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W0% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-8
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FH is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - FH · 0.8 goals / match - Thór

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).

14Goals scored (season)8
FHThór
27Goals conceded (season)27
FHThór
4.1Average goals in match3.5
FHThór
6Goals scored (last 5)3
FHThór
12Goals conceded (last 5)16
FHThór

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
FHThór
50%2 goals20%
FHThór
20%3 goals0%
FHThór
0%4 goals0%
FHThór

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal90%
FHThór
70%2 goals60%
FHThór
60%3 goals50%
FHThór
30%4 goals40%
FHThór

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time10%
FHThór
10%BTTS in both halves0%
FHThór
10%Scored in both halves10%
FHThór

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FHThór
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
FHThór
60%BTTS - last 560%
FHThór

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FHThór
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
FHThór
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FHThór

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
FHThór
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
FHThór
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
FHThór

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FH is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - FH · 0.6 pts / match - Thór

FH - half-time state
30% leading20% draw50% trailing
Thór - half-time state
10% leading30% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)0.6
FHThór
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.2
FHThór
1.4Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
FHThór
2.3Average goals (1st half)1.4
FHThór
30%Clean sheet before half-time30%
FHThór
50%No goal before half-time80%
FHThór

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)0.9
FHThór
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
FHThór
1.3Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
FHThór
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.1
FHThór
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
FHThór
70%No goal after half-time50%
FHThór

FH - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
11
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Thór - second-half results

20% W30% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Thór - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.6
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-7-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FH
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Thór
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
0
6
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FHLigaThór
Average goals in match 4.104.05 3.50
Both teams scored 70%71% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%73% 70%
Clean sheets 0%15% 10%
Goal before half-time 90%84% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%89% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.05
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
2.16
Home goals / match
1.89
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FH vs Thór?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FH vs Thór?

FH score 1.40 goals per game on average and Thór 0.80. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 70% of FH's matches and 50% of Thór's.

What form are FH and Thór in?

Over the last 5 games FH have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Thór 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs Thór?

The statistical background for FH vs Thór — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.